Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to talk.politics.guns,rec.boats,alt.fan.howard-stern,rec.sport.golf,seattle.politics
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jps wrote:
On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:00:16 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)" wrote: jps wrote in : On Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:00:42 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)" wrote: Yep.....do you think all the folks at CNN, MSNBC or FOX all march in lockstep with each other? I think the FOX channel is conservative just like those other channels are liberal. I don't think that they are mouthpieces of the Democratic Party or go to that party for their talking points any more than I think that FOX is the mouthpiece for the Republican Party. That's a very foggy mirror you've got. Fox News *fabricates* stories to tear at Democrats. Olbermann and Maddow may use hyperbole to make their points but they do not fabricate. Nor do they promote "grassroots" gatherings and then "report" on them. ROFLMAO!! Trust whom you wish. I prefer FOX, you can have Olbermann. They greatly overhyped the "taxpayer" revolt in Washngton DC and then didn't even cover the gay march on Washington two weeks later that had at least as many or more attendees -- and it wasn't promoted on television by CNN or MSNBC. Are you saying that the gay march wasn't covered by CCN or MSNBC either? That must have hurt. Of course, it was mentioned on FOX. You should watch it from time to time instead of getting your talking points from the Daily Kos or the Huffington Post. ![]() These a just a few examples of what happens at Fox News every day. But please feel free to keep fogging that mirror to your heart's content. You made a statement and gave *two* possible examples. Don't try to claim "a few examples". ![]() And you don't answer to **** all. You keep fogging that mirror. CNN and MSNBC both covered the gay march and the Fox News Taxpayer Revolt (TM). Fox News blasted the taxpayer revolt 24/7 for days. The gay march got 10 minutes of coverage. That station is full of ****, as are most of its followers. Congrats on creating your own fantasy world. You chose the wrong capsule. http://www.weeklystandard.com/Conten...4/143lkblo.asp THE ARGUMENT over whether the national press is dominated by liberals is over. Since 1962, there have been 11 surveys of the media that sought the political views of hundreds of journalists. In 1971, they were 53 percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In a 1976 survey of the Washington press corps, it was 59 percent liberal, 18 percent conservative. A 1985 poll of 3,200 reporters found them to be self-identified as 55 percent liberal, 17 percent conservative. In 1996, another survey of Washington journalists pegged the breakdown as 61 percent liberal, 9 percent conservative. Now, the new study by the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press found the national media to be 34 percent liberal and 7 percent conservative. Over 40-plus years, the only thing that's changed in the media's politics is that many national journalists have now cleverly decided to call themselves moderates. But their actual views haven't changed, the Pew survey showed. Their political beliefs are close to those of self-identified liberals and nowhere near those of conservatives. And the proportion of liberals to conservatives in the press, either 3-to-1 or 4-to-1, has stayed the same. That liberals are dominant is now beyond dispute. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The 2012 Pelosi GTxi SS/RT Sport Edition | General | |||
Perry & Palin for 2012 | General | |||
Romney in 2012 | General | |||
Location of 2012 whitewater coarse | General | |||
Rule 12 - Sailing Rule | ASA |