On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:55:25 -0700, "Calif Bill"
wrote:


"jps" wrote in message
.. .
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:36:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

just today. the victim was from St. Louis Mo.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/40830...ml?source=mypi

Guess what? One of them has survived.

Would that have happened with a gun? Nope.

He thought he had killed them both.

Bullets to the head would have made it for sure.

Glad he had a knife instead. 100% improvement on mortality rate.

Much more likely to die from a knife wound than a gun shot.

Right. Cite please.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:36:05 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:51:32 -0400, Lil' John
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:08:06 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:24:33 -0400, Lil' John
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:19:04 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:57:50 -0700, jps wrote:

http://www.ubersite.com/m/18886

That makes the point, doesn't it!

Yeah, that a gun works a hell of lot better killing somebody through a
door or wall. Or from across the street for that matter.

--Vic

Use a bow for that.

http://videos.komando.com/2009/07/21/

He's a natural. Know how that feels.
When I was a kid I could kill flies on the wing from ten feet - with
the rubber bands I used on my paper route.
From 10-20 feet the fly had be lit. Rubber band ballistics.
Limits the killing power at range.
Some kind of hand/eye coordination I think they call it.
Amazed everybody.
Gave it up at about 14 - the family fame didn't suit me and I was
fearful of getting a big head about it.
Kept my modesty ever since, but I know you won't think I'm bragging or
something, so I don't mind telling you.

--Vic

Your initials are not HK. I've no problem with VS stories.
--

John H

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:36:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

just today. the victim was from St. Louis Mo.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/40830...ml?source=mypi

Damn shame one of the women didn't get a pistol from under the pillow
and blow his ass away.

Then jps could have something to whine about.

--

John H

Vic Smith wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:51:32 -0400, Lil' John
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:08:06 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:24:33 -0400, Lil' John
wrote:

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:19:04 -0400, Gene
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 23:57:50 -0700, jps wrote:

http://www.ubersite.com/m/18886
That makes the point, doesn't it!
Yeah, that a gun works a hell of lot better killing somebody through a
door or wall. Or from across the street for that matter.

--Vic
Use a bow for that.

http://videos.komando.com/2009/07/21/

He's a natural. Know how that feels.
When I was a kid I could kill flies on the wing from ten feet - with
the rubber bands I used on my paper route.
From 10-20 feet the fly had be lit. Rubber band ballistics.
Limits the killing power at range.
Some kind of hand/eye coordination I think they call it.
Amazed everybody.
Gave it up at about 14 - the family fame didn't suit me and I was
fearful of getting a big head about it.
Kept my modesty ever since, but I know you won't think I'm bragging or
something, so I don't mind telling you.

--Vic

We were great with slingshots... I could take out a golf ball sized
target from 50 feet and my ex wife was even better...

On Jul 22, 12:01*am, jps wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:36:04 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

just today. the victim was from St. Louis Mo.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/40830...ml?source=mypi

Guess what? *One of them has survived.

Here more than one survived

http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_12753608

Would that have happened with a gun? *Nope.

There was a gun used and more survived than were killed.

He thought he had killed them both.

He was wrong.

Bullets to the head would have made it for sure.

Even though you might be speaking from experience, it isn't
necessarily the case.

Glad he had a knife instead. *100% improvement on mortality rate.

You may be glad, but I'm sorry any of it happened.

On Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:38:28 -0700 (PDT), Tim
wrote:

I bet this guy can 'nail' flies any day, any time.

I have some pet toads. You ought to see them nail crickets. Then there
is Boltcutter the snapping turtle. The entire head and neck snaps out
like the tongue of a toad or frog when it nails a goldfish or baby
mouse. Luckily for the flies, the anti-cat screens keep them away from
the toads.

Casady

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:36:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

The fact that this study is flawed is found in the assertion "The
distribution of wounds is different for knife assaults and gun
assaults, since victims of knife assaults have more chance to dodge
and block," which is ridiculously untrue.

For those with proper training, inside of about 10 feet, I'll take the
knife and you can have the gun. I'll never lose and you'll never see
the knife.

Ahem - without getting into specifics, you are absoutely 100% correct.

Yogi of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:36:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

The fact that this study is flawed is found in the assertion "The
distribution of wounds is different for knife assaults and gun
assaults, since victims of knife assaults have more chance to dodge
and block," which is ridiculously untrue.

For those with proper training, inside of about 10 feet, I'll take the
knife and you can have the gun. I'll never lose and you'll never see
the knife.

Ahem - without getting into specifics, you are absoutely 100% correct.


B.S. Bravado.

From 10 feet away, if someone came after me with a knife in a fight and
I were holding my SIG X-5, he'd be on the ground dying from three taps
to the chest. Especially if the guy with the knife were an old fart. You
know, a guy your age or Gene's age.

Closer than 10 feet, you're assuming the guy with the pistola is
standing around and waiting for the perp and his knife to close in...


--
A wise Latina makes better decisions than a dumb elephant.

Yogi of Woodstock wrote:
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 08:36:30 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

The fact that this study is flawed is found in the assertion "The
distribution of wounds is different for knife assaults and gun
assaults, since victims of knife assaults have more chance to dodge
and block," which is ridiculously untrue.

For those with proper training, inside of about 10 feet, I'll take the
knife and you can have the gun. I'll never lose and you'll never see
the knife.

Ahem - without getting into specifics, you are absoutely 100% correct.

Absolutely!

On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:12:43 -0400, H the K
wrote:

From 10 feet away, if someone came after me with a knife in a fight and
I were holding my SIG X-5, he'd be on the ground dying from three taps
to the chest. Especially if the guy with the knife were an old fart. You
know, a guy your age or Gene's age.

IF it were me, you'd be dead before you even got the gun out of the
holster.