Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 4, 7:57*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. *I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. *I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. *She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - She might kick his umemployed ass out of the house that she owns. There's a reason his name is not on the deed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Deliciously Truthful | General | |||
Harry, The Wager Made Easier for You | General | |||
A Cockpit Wager | ASA | |||
I'm stoked! I renewed my boat license (registration) for three more years! | General | |||
Democrats are more truthful and honest | ASA |