|
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager,
you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
GC Boater wrote:
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 8:09*pm, D K wrote:
GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote:
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32 pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07 pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26 pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough? Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. *Are you drinking tonight? *In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. *How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. *Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. *Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. *If not, I win. *Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it isnt. I dont want to see ONE of these " so-called " lies proven. YOU have a jealousy issue, nothing more, nothing less. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. *Are you drinking tonight? *In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. *How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. *Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. *Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. *If not, I win. *Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? You know, most of you wierdos in here use too many sock puppets to keep up with..... Are you another " Multiple Miggs " like Reggie No Balls? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 12:34 am, wrote:
On Jan 3, 10:32 pm, GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 9:07 pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26 pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? You know, most of you wierdos in here use too many sock puppets to keep up with..... Are you another " Multiple Miggs " like Reggie No Balls? After re-reading my post, I feel that I owe Harry Krause an apology. It was mean spirited and over the edge. So, I publicly apologize to Harry Krause for my previous post. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
John H wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com