|
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager,
you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
GC Boater wrote:
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 8:09*pm, D K wrote:
GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote:
Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32 pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07 pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26 pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough? Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. *Are you drinking tonight? *In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. *How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. *Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. *Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. *If not, I win. *Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No, it isnt. I dont want to see ONE of these " so-called " lies proven. YOU have a jealousy issue, nothing more, nothing less. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:32*pm, GC Boater wrote:
On Jan 3, 9:07*pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. *Are you drinking tonight? *In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. *How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. *Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. *Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. *If not, I win. *Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? You know, most of you wierdos in here use too many sock puppets to keep up with..... Are you another " Multiple Miggs " like Reggie No Balls? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 12:34 am, wrote:
On Jan 3, 10:32 pm, GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 9:07 pm, wrote: On Jan 3, 7:26 pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey SlamBam, this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? In any event, I hear your doubt about me having the $100K. How about this. Let Harry name the dollar amount, and then prove JUST ONE of the three referenced claims. Once this is done, we'll both place the dollar amount Harry has designated with a bonded escrow agent of his choosing. Once he proves just ONE OTHER (only two total of the three claims he has made here) then he wins the bet. If not, I win. Fair enough?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - this is not Herring. Are you drinking tonight? You know, most of you wierdos in here use too many sock puppets to keep up with..... Are you another " Multiple Miggs " like Reggie No Balls? After re-reading my post, I feel that I owe Harry Krause an apology. It was mean spirited and over the edge. So, I publicly apologize to Harry Krause for my previous post. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
John H wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater
wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09*pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 7:57*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. *I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. *I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. *She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And I wonder what the Yale folks would think about someone like him publically claiming to be a graduate? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 7:57*am, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. *There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. *I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. *I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. *She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - She might kick his umemployed ass out of the house that she owns. There's a reason his name is not on the deed. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Frogwatch wrote:
Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 3, 10:07*pm, wrote:
On Jan 3, 7:26*pm, GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? *Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. *Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. *How ‘bout it, Podner. *Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. *We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. *Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. *If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. You dont HAVE 100,000 Herring. And your Homosexual Stalker persona is showing again. Thats why they dont let your wife wear short skirts...when she sits, her balls show.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - What a nasty little asshole you are. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 9:35*am, HK wrote:
Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. Then leave. Plain and simple. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:55:20 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote: After re-reading my post, I feel that I owe Harry Krause an apology. It was mean spirited and over the edge. Not at all. The only problem is that Harry thrives on that type of criticism. He get's his jollys from it in some weird kind of way which is why he goes out of his way to attract it. He's a sick man with many issues. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 08:57:06 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: John H wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 18:25:31 -0800 (PST), GC Boater wrote: On Jan 3, 8:09 pm, D K wrote: GC Boater wrote: Hey Harry, old Chap, how ‘bout the wager? Now in my revised wager, you only have to prove TWO of the three facts that you’ve stated here. Just to refresh your recall of the details, the original wager is reproduced below. How ‘bout it, Podner. Or can we safely assume (as some here have claimed) that you are a yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, discredited, contemptible, foolish, hypocritical crackpot? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. that your are the yellow-bellied, lying, craven, whining, silly, foolish crackpot that just a few folks here think you are? The original offer (revised above): You have stated on this newsgroup that (1) your wife is a medical doctor, (2) you graduated from Yale and (3) you own(ed) a Zimmerman- like lobster boat. So here’s the “wager,” as you term it. We both deposit equal amounts of your choosing up to $100,000 each with a bonded, state regulated escrow agent. Upon your proof of the three items above to the “reasonable man” standard, you win the wager and walk away with up to a $100,000 profit. If you fail to prove the above items, then I win the wager. Evidently you have found that narcissism has its limits. There might be a Nobel Prize for you if you publish this.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Harry should jump at it. I think with an extra $100K for her unemployed husband, Karen might consider putting his name on the deed to the house in which he is currently a tenant. I will even let Harry pick the escrow agent to hold the money as long as they're bonded. I think you should put the wager on paper, put it in an envelope, and send it to Karen. She'd probably jump at the chance to get an extra $100K for a new couch or something. I don't think that is a good idea. She would be very upset to know that her husband is ashamed of her job and career choice. A hundred thousand dollars will overcome a lot of 'upsettedness'. [FWIW: My spell checker wanted to change that last word to 'punctualness'. It's always trying to change 'Eisboch' to 'history'. Maybe there's a message there?] |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 09:45:58 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:55:20 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: After re-reading my post, I feel that I owe Harry Krause an apology. It was mean spirited and over the edge. Not at all. The only problem is that Harry thrives on that type of criticism. He get's his jollys from it in some weird kind of way which is why he goes out of his way to attract it. He's a sick man with many issues. Now we'll see if Harry apologizes for his response! |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
HK wrote:
Do you know Caroline Kennedy? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? I don't know Caroline Kennedy, but I am positive she is smarter than Harry Krause. I did think it was funny that Harry thinks it is a major accomplishment to be smarter than he is. ;) |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:10:32 -0500, "Reginald P. Smithers III, Esq."
wrote: HK wrote: Do you know Caroline Kennedy? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? I don't know Caroline Kennedy, but I am positive she is smarter than Harry Krause. I did think it was funny that Harry thinks it is a major accomplishment to be smarter than he is. ;) I don't think she's smarter than Harry Krause. I've heard Harry speak, in person. It was bad, but it wasn't this bad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV7uQsUMT9c |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
"HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Excellent idea. I recommend you leave. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Don Whitewash wrote"
"This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over." Ahh, the man of the hour his own self checks in. The president of S.T.U.P.I.D. (Society to Unite People in Dullness). And apparently the genes are undiluted in the president’s next generation. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Don White wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 11:49*am, HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. Go start one. Please, then don't come back here. Destroyed rec.boats? Do you mean by political post after political post? Or do you mean by being a fat, gross, vulgar name calling narcissist? The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. Or any other's who won't believe your hundreds of lies? I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away, you won't be missed. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 11:55*am, wrote:
On Jan 4, 11:49*am, HK wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. Go start one. Please, then don't come back here. Destroyed rec.boats? Do you mean by political post after political post? Or do you mean by being a fat, gross, vulgar name calling narcissist? The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. Or any other's who won't believe your hundreds of lies? I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away, you won't be missed.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet. Every group has one... |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
|
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
HK wrote:
wrote: You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy, Herring, et al. This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide. Who is foul mouthed? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 11:17*am, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 11:55 am, wrote: On Jan 4, 11:49 am, HK wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. Go start one. Please, then don't come back here. Destroyed rec.boats? Do you mean by political post after political post? Or do you mean by being a fat, gross, vulgar name calling narcissist? The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. Or any other's who won't believe your hundreds of lies? I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away, you won't be missed.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet. Every group has one... * *You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy, Herring, et al. * *This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hey Harry, Matey, what about the wager? New Year, no house, no job, little prospects. It should be easy for you to collect up to ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($100,000.00)! |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:11:29 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch
wrote: We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Those of us in at least the top half of the scale found out in kindergarten or earlier that there is a bottom half. Casady |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 1:48*pm, (Richard Casady) wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:11:29 -0800 (PST), Frogwatch wrote: We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Those of us in at least the top half of the scale found out in kindergarten or earlier that there is a bottom half. Casady I think the difference in the two parties is one believes everyone who works and pays taxes should have a voice anyway, the other just dismisses the ones they consider no worthy. The problem is they don't seperate by IQ, they seperate by ideology. Fact is, this is America, everyone should be equally represented... |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
HK wrote:
Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin. Start up a moderated newsgroup. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 12:17*pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Jan 4, 11:55 am, wrote: On Jan 4, 11:49 am, HK wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. Go start one. Please, then don't come back here. Destroyed rec.boats? Do you mean by political post after political post? Or do you mean by being a fat, gross, vulgar name calling narcissist? The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. Or any other's who won't believe your hundreds of lies? I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Go away, you won't be missed.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet. Every group has one... * *You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy, Herring, et al. * *This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Gee, the only "foul-mouthed" one seems to be YOU..... |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 11:25*am, "Don White" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. *That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. *In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says.. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. *We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. *Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this *newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If it bothers you, don't come here. Simple, eh? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
BAR wrote:
HK wrote: Don White wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Frogwatch wrote: Harry has stated that he thinks Caroline Kennedy is smart. That definitively places him (Harry) on the IQ spectrum somewhere less than his age. In consideration of this, why worry about ANYTHING he says. You are more likely to find intelligence in the random jabbering of chimps. We all need to become adjusted to the concept that some people are simply not qualified to have opinions. Sorry Harry, but the truth sometimes hurts, better to find out now than later. You know, until this post of yours, I thought you were cut from slightly better cloth than *some* of the slimeballs that frequent this newsgroup. Do you know Caroline Kennedy? Are you aware of her academic and foundation accomplishments? Do you have any empathy for that fact that her father was assassinated in the service of this country when she was a little girl, and that her uncle was also assassinated, and that her initial shyness in this quest of hers might be related to a bit of nervousness? Do you think she thinks she might be murdered, too? She's smart enough, probably smarter than you are and I am. Why the over-the-top personal attack on her and on me over this? You're behaving like Herring, D K, Loogy, and the rest of the slimeballs...and I am truly sorry to see that. This newsgroup just keeps sliding farther into the cesspool. This slimeball behaviour is like an epidemic. Maybe it's time the entire newsgroup was fumigated and started over. Or maybe it is time an actual boating newsgroup was started. Oh, wait...chuck tried that and guess what...the same turds who have destroyed rec.boats brought that place down, too. The only real hope is a moderated newsgroup in which assholes like Herring, Loogy, Reggie, JustHate, Florida Jim, DK and a couple of others are dropped the moment they behave as they do here. I appreciate the efforts of Gene and a couple of others for their positive efforts here, but I think they are wasting their time. Thankfully, I have a good bozo bin. Start up a moderated newsgroup. Chuck did that, sort of. There aren't enough actual boaters in here to make it worthwhile. Hell, how many boating-related posts have you made in the last year? Three? |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:50:22 -0500, BAR wrote:
Start up a moderated newsgroup. Speaking of which, what happened to Chuck's Island? He finally give up? Can't say I didn't warn him. :) |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
Tom Francis - SWSports wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 14:50:22 -0500, BAR wrote: Start up a moderated newsgroup. Speaking of which, what happened to Chuck's Island? He finally give up? Can't say I didn't warn him. :) Loogy, Florida Jim, Reggie, and the rest of the assholes jumped on every boating related post and trashed it. |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:17:51 -0500, HK wrote:
Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet. Every group has one... You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy, Herring, et al. This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide. Harry Krause 2015 Rosedale Lane Huntingtown, Maryland 20639 410 535-1594 (voice) 202 365-0164 (cell) |
“Deliciously Truthful” Wager for Harry is Renewed
On Jan 4, 2:54*pm, John H wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:17:51 -0500, HK wrote: Don't forget the army of idiot crossposters he unleashed when we ignored him... The man is a one man destruction team for usenet. Every group has one... * You really are a piece of work. You are a foul-mouthed uneducated ignorant piece of ****, perfectly suited to hang out with Loogy, Herring, et al. * This group and its occupants needs to be advertised far and wide. Harry Krause 2015 Rosedale Lane Huntingtown, Maryland 20639 410 535-1594 (voice) 202 365-0164 (cell) Hey Krause, you want me to put my wager in writing, sign it, and mail it to you and Karen? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com