"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...


So which war monger are you rooting for?

Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is not a war monger.

You are an idiot.


Sums it up nicely.


He couldn't stand it that you smacked him down so thoroughly in the "Obama
promising to invade Pakistan" discussion.

The liberal modus operandi involves three things:

1) remain ignorant of the facts as long as you can,
2) when someone points out the facts prove you are wrong then..
3) yell LIAR or...
4) run away.

--
Gregory Hall


Actually it's "she," and I simply got tired of dealing with blatant
obtuseness. The fact remains that Obama has exactly the same policy
regarding Pakistan as McCain: IF terrorists are hiding in Pakistan; IF the
Pakistani government refuses to pursue them; and IF we have "actionable
intelligence" which gives us reason to belive we know where they are and
that a strike against them would be successful, we should act.

Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade" Pakistan,
you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to state that
Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the fact that his
position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and deceitful. In short, it
is a lie.

Just another "liberal" Ron Paul supporter.
Karin

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...


So which war monger are you rooting for?

Ron Paul.

Ron Paul is not a war monger.

You are an idiot.


Sums it up nicely.


He couldn't stand it that you smacked him down so thoroughly in the
"Obama promising to invade Pakistan" discussion.

The liberal modus operandi involves three things:

1) remain ignorant of the facts as long as you can,
2) when someone points out the facts prove you are wrong then..
3) yell LIAR or...
4) run away.

--
Gregory Hall


Actually it's "she," and I simply got tired of dealing with blatant
obtuseness. The fact remains that Obama has exactly the same policy
regarding Pakistan as McCain: IF terrorists are hiding in Pakistan; IF the
Pakistani government refuses to pursue them; and IF we have "actionable
intelligence" which gives us reason to belive we know where they are and
that a strike against them would be successful, we should act.

Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade"
Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best. And to
state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out the
fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and
deceitful. In short, it is a lie.

Should have know he was dealing with a female . . . My bad!

Extend your logic a little further, Sweetie, and you will see how absurd
your argument really is.

You contend it is a lie to leave out information that does not include
McCain's stance so let's run with that.

I can then say YOU are a liar because you left out the stances of Gloria La
Riva, Chuck Baldwin, Gene Amondson, Bob Barr, Thomas Stevens, James, Harris,
Cynthia McKinney, Alan Keyes, Ralph Nader, Brian Moore and Charles Jay who
are ALL running for President of the United States and are on the ballot at
this time.


Just another "liberal" Ron Paul supporter.
Karin

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane woman
would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I
might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no.

Just another insane liberal Ron Paul supporter,
Karin

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm
not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

Too late! Bush couldn't say it right either. ;-)

But, you don't really think any president could create a theocracy do you?
That means you'd rather have a man who CAN and WILL TRY to turn the country
into a socialist country over a woman who could not turn the country into a
theocracy?

See what I mean about female logic? It's just not logical.


Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I
might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no.

Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive
experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between
your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or
what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not supporting
McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic.

--
Gregory Hall

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...
Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive
experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between
your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or
what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not
supporting McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic.

--
Gregory Hall


What can I say? Obviously, I hate America and want to see it invaded by
communists. Oh, and you forgot to say that Obama "pals around with
terrorists." Too bad -- that might have swayed me.

That's the problem with you right-wingers: Either everyone agrees with you,
or they are "unpatriotic." As was said by one wiser than me, "Patriotism is
the last refuge of scoundrels."

As to the differences between Palin and Obama, I would choose Obama's wisdom
and thoughtfullness over Palin's "experience" any day of the week, and twice
on Sunday. Fortunately, however, there are other choices.

Did I mention that I am supporting Ron Paul? Seems to me I did. At least
twice. And no, a vote for Ron Paul is not a vote for Obama. Nor is it a vote
for McCain. It is a vote for Ron Paul.

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:


"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

You really want a limp wrist on the button? If Obama croaks, Biden's
brain is a ticking time bomb. Biden refuses to release his brain scans.
Hmmmm


Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT

However, she did release her brain scans: http://www.nothingisthere.com/

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
easolutions...
"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:


"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the
word,
"nuclear."

You really want a limp wrist on the button? If Obama croaks, Biden's
brain is a ticking time bomb. Biden refuses to release his brain scans.
Hmmmm


Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT

However, she did release her brain scans: http://www.nothingisthere.com/

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com


I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Can it possibly get any worse? I *really* don't want to see her brain
scans.....

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

On Oct 24, 3:19*am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message

easolutions...



"WaIIy" wrote in message
.. .
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?

Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? *I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the
word,
"nuclear."

You really want a limp wrist on the button? *If Obama croaks, Biden's
brain is a ticking time bomb. *Biden refuses to release his brain scans.
Hmmmm

Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT

However, she did release her brain scans:http://www.nothingisthere.com/

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Can it possibly get any worse? I *really* don't want to see her brain
scans.....

--
"j" ganz

Of course she does not want to reveal her medical records..then it
will become clear that her last child was really her daughters, and
has been adopted by her and her husband, just as any good poor black
family would have it. Makes one almost sympathetic, especially in
light of the childs disability. No wonder that that has become part of
her " platform of reform"

Interesting conspiracy theory!! I like it.

wrote in message
...
On Oct 24, 3:19 am, "Capt. JG" wrote:
Can it possibly get any worse? I *really* don't want to see her brain
scans.....

--
"j" ganz

Of course she does not want to reveal her medical records..then it
will become clear that her last child was really her daughters, and
has been adopted by her and her husband, just as any good poor black
family would have it. Makes one almost sympathetic, especially in
light of the childs disability. No wonder that that has become part of
her " platform of reform"



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:19:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Zamboni is bad, but Shawanda is just fine?

Think it over.

So who is named "Shawanda"?

As for "Zamboni," it beats her first choice, "Toepick."