"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade"
Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best.


And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving out
the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and
deceitful. In short, it is a lie.


If I point out that a certain tomato on the vine is yellow (and it is), is
it then a lie because I didn't point out the tomato on the other vine is
green?

The deceit lay wholly within yourself. You are making unstated assumptions
about another person's reasoning that seriously impair your ability to
engage in any form of rational discussion.

For the record I'm a Ron Paul supporter and have been so since he was first
elected to office and voted for him when he first ran for president decades
ago.

Now who is duplicitous?

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
et...

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm
not ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

Too late! Bush couldn't say it right either. ;-)

But, you don't really think any president could create a theocracy do you?
That means you'd rather have a man who CAN and WILL TRY to turn the country
into a socialist country over a woman who could not turn the country into a
theocracy?

See what I mean about female logic? It's just not logical.


Had McCain chosen a running mate who is qualified to serve as president, I
might have considered voting for him. As it stands, however, no.

Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive
experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between
your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or
what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not supporting
McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic.

--
Gregory Hall

"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...
Palin is more qualified than Obama by virtue of her greater executive
experience. He has NONE she has years of it. Your ONLY choice is between
your unfounded fears of what you irrationally fear Palin *might* do IF or
what Obama SAYs he will do IF. You're supporting a Marxist by not
supporting McCain/Palin. It's that simple. You are unpatriotic.

--
Gregory Hall


What can I say? Obviously, I hate America and want to see it invaded by
communists. Oh, and you forgot to say that Obama "pals around with
terrorists." Too bad -- that might have swayed me.

That's the problem with you right-wingers: Either everyone agrees with you,
or they are "unpatriotic." As was said by one wiser than me, "Patriotism is
the last refuge of scoundrels."

As to the differences between Palin and Obama, I would choose Obama's wisdom
and thoughtfullness over Palin's "experience" any day of the week, and twice
on Sunday. Fortunately, however, there are other choices.

Did I mention that I am supporting Ron Paul? Seems to me I did. At least
twice. And no, a vote for Ron Paul is not a vote for Obama. Nor is it a vote
for McCain. It is a vote for Ron Paul.

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

Now if you want to take that as a "promise" that we will "invade"
Pakistan, you go right ahead and do so. But it's a stretch at best.


And to state that Obama has "promised to invade Pakistan" while leaving
out the fact that his position is identical to McCain's is duplicitous and
deceitful. In short, it is a lie.


If I point out that a certain tomato on the vine is yellow (and it is), is
it then a lie because I didn't point out the tomato on the other vine is
green?

The deceit lay wholly within yourself. You are making unstated assumptions
about another person's reasoning that seriously impair your ability to
engage in any form of rational discussion.

For the record I'm a Ron Paul supporter and have been so since he was
first elected to office and voted for him when he first ran for president
decades ago.

Now who is duplicitous?



Ouch!

In article ,
"KLC Lewis" wrote:

"Charles Momsen" wrote in message
...
So which war monger are you rooting for?


Ron Paul.

Ron Paul.

--
Molesworth

http://www.stcustards.free-online.co.uk/

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:


"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the word,
"nuclear."

You really want a limp wrist on the button? If Obama croaks, Biden's
brain is a ticking time bomb. Biden refuses to release his brain scans.
Hmmmm


Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT

However, she did release her brain scans: http://www.nothingisthere.com/

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Capt. JG" wrote in message
easolutions...
"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:57:19 -0500, "KLC Lewis"
wrote:


"Gregory Hall" wrote in message
...

Ron Paul would have to be a write-in . . .

And?


Are you sure YOU are informed enough to vote? I would think any sane
woman would be voting for Sarah Palin/John McCain.

--
Gregory Hall

There is a strong possibility that John McCain would die within his first
term of office -- he's in horrible health. That means that Sarah Palin
would
become President sometime within the next four years. Sorry, but I'm not
ready for a right-wing fundamentalist Christian theocracy. I also must
disqualify anyone from serving as president who cannot pronounce the
word,
"nuclear."

You really want a limp wrist on the button? If Obama croaks, Biden's
brain is a ticking time bomb. Biden refuses to release his brain scans.
Hmmmm


Fortunately, Gov. Palin has released her complete medical records. NOT

However, she did release her brain scans: http://www.nothingisthere.com/

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com


I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Can it possibly get any worse? I *really* don't want to see her brain
scans.....

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:19:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Zamboni is bad, but Shawanda is just fine?

Think it over.

So who is named "Shawanda"?

As for "Zamboni," it beats her first choice, "Toepick."

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:19:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Zamboni is bad, but Shawanda is just fine?

Think it over.

So who is named "Shawanda"?

As for "Zamboni," it beats her first choice, "Toepick."



It's either some obscure relative of Obama in Africa or he's making a lame
racist remark. I don't recall anyone who is running for President or VP
wanting to name a child Shawanda.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:34:26 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

"KLC Lewis" wrote in message
...

"WaIIy" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:19:46 -0700, "Capt. JG"
wrote:

I take that back! She wants to name her sixth child Zamboni. I kid you
not...

Zamboni is bad, but Shawanda is just fine?

Think it over.

So who is named "Shawanda"?

As for "Zamboni," it beats her first choice, "Toepick."



It's either some obscure relative of Obama in Africa or he's making a lame
racist remark. I don't recall anyone who is running for President or VP
wanting to name a child Shawanda.

Oh, odd sounding names is racist?

Why don't you say Barack's middle name a few dozen times if it makes you
feel better.

Is Barack less odd sounding than Zamboni?

No, but Piper for a girl's name? Trig? Track?

Bristol and Willow are at least nice names that you don't have to defend in
the schoolyard.

Do you feel the need to stoop to a discourse on proposed names for kids?

Bristol is sort of sailor-like, so yes. Besides, I'm not old enough to
stoop.



--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com