Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
* Ernest Scribbler wrote, On 8/12/2007 6:10 AM:
"otnmbrd" wrote Comon Wilbur, ..... read rule 4, first rule of Part B, then rule 5, then read rule 2, then go back to rule 5 "every vessel shall at ALL times" ... then stand on your head and spell "rhinoceros" ... Unless there are unambiguous definitions of "proper look-out" and "all available means" and "appropriate in the prevailing circumstances" somewhere in there, any competent attorney should be able to convince any reasonable judge that these is more guidelines than actual rules. Actually, there are such definitions. Read a book such as Farwells and you'll start to understand. And remember, Admiralty Courts are not the same as the normal courts you see on TV. Actually, at some levels in the US they are the same, but most of the time they follow the established precedents. Here's a link to an appeal court's ruling that I found interesting because it is a rare case where a boat was found 100% at fault, rather than shared blame. The sailboat, Coyote, is the vessel Mike Plant disappeared from when the keel fell off. His fiancée inherited the boat and chartered it to Dave Scully, who bumped it into a fishing boat on a qualifying run. Scully was found 100% at fault, for not having a lookout or proper lights. http://www.law.emory.edu/4circuit/dec97/961209.p.html What it boils down to is that if you hit something you didn't see, its your fault. And when you start out by saying you do a scan every 15 minutes, that would be essentially admitting you didn't see something. One curious thing is that many minor cases are really decided by insurance companies. They will divide blame as they see fit, which will affect the owners as far as the deductible payment. A friend was in a simple port/starboard collision. They were on starboard, but admitted they didn't see the other boat until it was too late. This implied they didn't keep a proper lookout and thus were judged 24% responsible by the insurance companies. The other boat had to pay 76% of their deductible, they paid 24% of the other's. I assume they figured that 48% of the issue was lookout, 52% was port/starboard. If you want to consider something vague in the rules, think about the way "Safe Speed" is defined, and how that applies to high speed vessels in the fog. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Emergency beacon info from USCG/USCG Aux | General | |||
Colregs Questions; BORING! | ASA | |||
Help me with Rule 30 of the colregs please | ASA | |||
Colregs - flashing lights | Cruising | |||
COLREGS- Mooron Style | ASA |