LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats.cruising
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 42
Default SKIP Please Read USCG COLREGS

* Ernest Scribbler wrote, On 8/12/2007 6:10 AM:
"otnmbrd" wrote
Comon Wilbur, ..... read rule 4, first rule of Part B, then rule 5, then
read rule 2, then go back to rule 5 "every vessel shall at ALL times"


... then stand on your head and spell "rhinoceros" ...

Unless there are unambiguous definitions of "proper look-out" and "all
available means" and "appropriate in the prevailing circumstances" somewhere
in there, any competent attorney should be able to convince any reasonable
judge that these is more guidelines than actual rules.


Actually, there are such definitions. Read a book such as Farwells
and you'll start to understand. And remember, Admiralty Courts are
not the same as the normal courts you see on TV. Actually, at some
levels in the US they are the same, but most of the time they follow
the established precedents.

Here's a link to an appeal court's ruling that I found interesting
because it is a rare case where a boat was found 100% at fault, rather
than shared blame. The sailboat, Coyote, is the vessel Mike Plant
disappeared from when the keel fell off. His fiancée inherited the
boat and chartered it to Dave Scully, who bumped it into a fishing
boat on a qualifying run. Scully was found 100% at fault, for
not having a lookout or proper lights.

http://www.law.emory.edu/4circuit/dec97/961209.p.html

What it boils down to is that if you hit something you didn't see, its
your fault. And when you start out by saying you do a scan every 15
minutes, that would be essentially admitting you didn't see something.

One curious thing is that many minor cases are really decided by
insurance companies. They will divide blame as they see fit, which
will affect the owners as far as the deductible payment. A friend was
in a simple port/starboard collision. They were on starboard, but
admitted they didn't see the other boat until it was too late. This
implied they didn't keep a proper lookout and thus were judged 24%
responsible by the insurance companies. The other boat had to pay 76%
of their deductible, they paid 24% of the other's. I assume they
figured that 48% of the issue was lookout, 52% was port/starboard.

If you want to consider something vague in the rules, think about the
way "Safe Speed" is defined, and how that applies to high speed
vessels in the fog.

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Emergency beacon info from USCG/USCG Aux wf3h General 0 December 16th 06 07:29 PM
Colregs Questions; BORING! Thom Stewart ASA 35 September 21st 06 01:48 AM
Help me with Rule 30 of the colregs please Ellen MacArthur ASA 28 September 16th 06 01:06 AM
Colregs - flashing lights News f2s Cruising 6 August 8th 06 09:51 PM
COLREGS- Mooron Style Capt. Mooron ASA 63 February 22nd 04 11:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017