![]() |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message news:O1Yaf.407879$1i.39677@pd7tw2no... Bill McKee wrote: "Gary" wrote in message news:yxXaf.404825$oW2.114246@pd7tw1no... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article t, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message .. . In article .earthlink.net, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message .. . Yeah, so? What's your point? I know the regs and clearly you can quote them. What are you trying to tell us here? That you are an idiot. Ah, a name caller. Well, ok then. You sure won that argument on the merits. No, just stating the obvious. Yes, it's quite obvious what you are and why you're doing it... PWCER!!!! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Such anger. And my PWC has 350 CID and 330 hp. Big PWC. Oh Billy, What you have is still a little toy boat with the same engine my mother had in her station wagon. If it is a powered vessel less that 10kdwt or not over 4khp I won't even list it my log as sea time. You really should go take a safe boating course somewhere - anywhere. In the mean time, if you really want to learn - go to http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/navrules.htm and buy or download a real copy of COMDTINST M16672.2 (by-the-by nothing you have said is supported between the covers.) A man of much experience once said to me "The only thing required to run one of those little motorboats is a credit rating." Matt Colie Lifelong Waterman and Licensed Mariner (Chf Stm & Mtr, Pilot 10k Grt Lks, Mst VUS Offshore 100t) So you are a drunk also. Oh billy, Again you show your true capability. Please, quit while you still can. You have demonstrated a amazingly clear lack of any understanding of the sited Colregs. (This was a part of the exams for the cert listed.) And, you have answered and proved finally and personaly to me a long standing standing question I have had: If man had not invented canned beer, would anybody have ever bother to develop recreational powerboats? You have just given proof positive on that account. Now go play with your little toy boat that takes no skill to operate (so impaired judgement is not and issue - so you believe - i.e. requires much less capability than any sailing dink) and has less horse power than my engines need to just crank (about a third of a bow thruster)and be sure you watch out for those dangerous sailboats out there. Demand your rights on the water and please, tell all teh good people here what water you inhabit so we may avoid your kingdom. Matt - see prior sig So you turn when a sailboat crosses in front of your ship? You sound 5 short blasts, go hard astern and turn. That's all you can do. Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:yxXaf.404825$oW2.114246@pd7tw1no... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article t, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article . net, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message .. . Yeah, so? What's your point? I know the regs and clearly you can quote them. What are you trying to tell us here? That you are an idiot. Ah, a name caller. Well, ok then. You sure won that argument on the merits. No, just stating the obvious. Yes, it's quite obvious what you are and why you're doing it... PWCER!!!! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Such anger. And my PWC has 350 CID and 330 hp. Big PWC. Oh Billy, What you have is still a little toy boat with the same engine my mother had in her station wagon. If it is a powered vessel less that 10kdwt or not over 4khp I won't even list it my log as sea time. You really should go take a safe boating course somewhere - anywhere. In the mean time, if you really want to learn - go to http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navrules/navrules.htm and buy or download a real copy of COMDTINST M16672.2 (by-the-by nothing you have said is supported between the covers.) A man of much experience once said to me "The only thing required to run one of those little motorboats is a credit rating." Matt Colie Lifelong Waterman and Licensed Mariner (Chf Stm & Mtr, Pilot 10k Grt Lks, Mst VUS Offshore 100t) So you are a drunk also. Oh billy, Again you show your true capability. Please, quit while you still can. You have demonstrated a amazingly clear lack of any understanding of the sited Colregs. (This was a part of the exams for the cert listed.) And, you have answered and proved finally and personaly to me a long standing standing question I have had: If man had not invented canned beer, would anybody have ever bother to develop recreational powerboats? You have just given proof positive on that account. Now go play with your little toy boat that takes no skill to operate (so impaired judgement is not and issue - so you believe - i.e. requires much less capability than any sailing dink) and has less horse power than my engines need to just crank (about a third of a bow thruster)and be sure you watch out for those dangerous sailboats out there. Demand your rights on the water and please, tell all teh good people here what water you inhabit so we may avoid your kingdom. Matt - see prior sig So you turn when a sailboat crosses in front of your ship? You sound 5 short blasts, go hard astern and turn. That's all you can do. Doing nothing is not an option. Gary Does he have to use his horn, or does he do it naturally? -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:pIWaf.404382$oW2.266485@pd7tw1no... Jonathan Ganz wrote: In article , DSK wrote: Dr. Dr. Smithers wrote: Doug, Do you have any idea how narrow many channels are? Take a look at the majority of the St. Law. Seaway. Actually, that's VERY wide as channels go. Are you suggesting that you cannot manage to drive your boat along a course and keep it within 100 yards or so of where it should be? Are you also suggesting that going SLOW when close to other boat traffic is not an option? Don't know about St. Lawrence, but were we sail, the channel can be less than 30 ft. wide in spots. Is that the channel that you sail in? How small is your boat? In channels like that it is even more important that you understand the basic rules. (b)In construing and complying with these Rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these Rules necessary to avoid immediate danger. Gary Depends on the day. We usually sail in the SF bay, and there are channels in the area that are quite narrow. Some less than 30 feet. Two boats can just make passage at the same time. I don't own a boat at the moment, but I teach on a Yamaha 30. Where we keep her, the speed limit is 5 mph. Other places have nothing posted, but it would be highly stupid to do much more than that. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message
nk.net... "Peggie Hall" wrote in message ... ENUFF AWREDDY!!!!!! Well Peggy, most should read your book. They are full of crap. Peggy, I'm truly sorry for annoying you by this thread, and I apologize for Bill. He can't help himself. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:34:14 GMT, "Bill McKee"
wrote: Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. [Bill] I am tired of hearing you two bicker. Why don't you cut rec.boats. building and rec.boats.cruising from your distribution? Please? PLEASE? Brian Whatcott p.s. You are both traceable - don't get me mad. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Capt. JG" wrote in
: Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Jeff wrote in
: proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Here are a couple of the applicable rules to consider.
Note the specific rule for vessels less than 20 metres or a sailing vessel (any length) in a narrow channel. Note the specific rule on overtaking in narrow channels. There are also rules on safe speed which I am happy to provide to help the discussion. People with more savvy than any of use created and continue to improve the rules. It is up to us to learn them. Rule 9 Narrow Channels--International (a)A vessel proceeding along the course of a narrow channel or fairway shall keep as near to the outer limit of the channel or fairway which lies on her starboard side as is safe and practicable. (b)A vessel of less than 20 metres in length or a sailing vessel shall not impede the passage of a vessel which can safely navigate only within a narrow channel or fairway. (d)A vessel shall not cross a narrow channel or fairway if such crossing impedes the passage of a vessel which can safely navigate only within such channel or fairway. The latter vessel may use the sound signal prescribed in Rule 34(d) if in doubt as to the intention of the crossing vessel. (e)(i)In a narrow channel or fairway when overtaking can take place only if the vessel to be overtaken has to take action to permit safe passing, the vessel intending to overtake shall indicate her intention by sounding the appropriate signal prescribed in Rule 34(c)(i). The vessel to be overtaken shall, if in agreement, sound the appropriate signal prescribed in Rule 34(c)(ii) and take steps to permit safe passing. If in doubt she may sound the signals prescribed in Rule 34(d). (ii) This Rule does not relieve the overtaking vessel of her obligation under Rule 13. Rule 13 Overtaking--International (a)Notwithstanding anything contained in the Rules of Part B, Sections I and II, any vessel overtaking any other vessel shall keep out of the way of the vessel being overtaken. (d)Any subsequent alteration of the bearing between the two vessels shall not make the overtaking vessel a crossing vessel within the meaning of these Rules or relieve her of the duty of keeping clear of the overtaken vessel until she is finally past and clear. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Brian Whatcott wrote:
On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:34:14 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. [Bill] I am tired of hearing you two bicker. Why don't you cut rec.boats. building and rec.boats.cruising from your distribution? Please? PLEASE? Brian Whatcott p.s. You are both traceable - don't get me mad. I hope I don't sound like I'm bickering. I am treating this thread as a interesting Rules of the Road discussion and a bit of a review. It's not often that I get to hear the point of view of amateurs or recreational boaters on RofR situations. It is causing me to refer to my books and think. Sorry if you aren't enjoying the thread. Gary |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... "Scotty" wrote in message ... "Don White" wrote Not all sailors are familiar enough with the collision regulations either. In your case, sounds like you were overtaking him. You are the 'giveway boat'. That said, he has a responsibility to give you ample time to avoid a collision. Well, he did, didn't he? Was there a collision? SV Barely. But no collision, right? Because I was not drunk like most times. good for you. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote
Is it really *that* hard to turn a steering wheel, Bill? Do you have wimpy limp wrists? SBV You remind me of the sailor who decides to turn with no signal and Oh, you were serious about those turn signals. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no:
Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Larry wrote:
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no: Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Gary wrote:
You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Don White wrote:
Gary wrote: You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. Kinda like pedestrians, bicycles and cars. Although might has right it is not correct. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:5b4bf.407926$oW2.221802@pd7tw1no... Brian Whatcott wrote: On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 06:34:14 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: Doing nothing is not an option. Gary And you put your tanker on the rocks entering San Francisco bay. Sure, we are all that stupid. Sounds like you are. [Bill] I am tired of hearing you two bicker. Why don't you cut rec.boats. building and rec.boats.cruising from your distribution? Please? PLEASE? Brian Whatcott p.s. You are both traceable - don't get me mad. I hope I don't sound like I'm bickering. I am treating this thread as a interesting Rules of the Road discussion and a bit of a review. It's not often that I get to hear the point of view of amateurs or recreational boaters on RofR situations. It is causing me to refer to my books and think. Sorry if you aren't enjoying the thread. Gary I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message
... "Capt. JG" wrote in : Answer: PWCs are always at fault. They can't help it, they were built that way. I know someone who was passing a powerboat in a big PWC. The powerboat idiot didn't look behind him to see who was passing him and turned to port, into the PWC who ended up crashing into the port side of the powerboat. The PWC rider successfully sued for a new ski, medical costs, lost wages, etc., etc., after the DNR quoted the rules-of-the-road about maintaining course and speed when being overtaken someone else posted here. DNR investigated the accident and was not amused when the big powerboat rich boy pointed out "It's just a PWC", as you hotheads infer. The hotheaded attitudes displayed in this stupid thread over the hated PWC is a mixture for disaster on the waterways. The PWC riders have just as much rights to use the public's waterways as the millionaires in the Azimuts. Just ask the PWCer's attorney....(c; Someone said he drooled over this case when he found out how much money the powerboater was worth...(c; By the way, in SC, that PWC only needs be 50 ft away from your boat to run full throttle past you....50 ft....Says so right in the boating manual. Run over his little PWC. Make his day..... -- Larry, 3rd Mate S/V "Lionheart" Larry, if you or anyone else really thought I was serious, then you have more problems that can be solved here. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Space Pope" wrote in message
... On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 03:12:18 GMT, "Bill McKee" wrote: I never said I was a jetski. Were you, or have you ever been, a jetski? Now that's funny! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I
apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message ... Jeff wrote in : proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Larry" wrote in message ... Jeff wrote in : proper to pass within 15 feet of boats doing 25 MPH shouldn't be out there. It's 50 ft in South Carolina...just like for a dock. 200' from the marina. -- Larry I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Don White" wrote in message ... Gary wrote: You are right. There are really only two sets of over-arching rules, the Colregs and the Inland Rules. Adhere to those and all is well. The people that don't learn them cause us all to come to grief. It kills some of the yahoos that a slow moving sailboat has right of way over their 300hp, gas guzzlin', air polluting monstrosity. There is no "right of way" for boats. If there was as you state, a sailboat, could make any turn he wanted at any time and he would never be at fault. Look at Colregs section 17. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote Is it really *that* hard to turn a steering wheel, Bill? Do you have wimpy limp wrists? SBV You remind me of the sailor who decides to turn with no signal and Oh, you were serious about those turn signals. SBV \ You need to be more creative in your writings. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt. JG wrote:
"Gary" wrote in message news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) Closest Point of Approach |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt. JG wrote:
When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Jeeze, Jon, how did you get that license? Did you take a course? (must of just been 6-pak, not master) I could understand if someone from FL didn't know it, but in your area, as well as mine, you should take fog seriously. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Jeff" wrote in message
. .. Capt. JG wrote: When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Jeeze, Jon, how did you get that license? Did you take a course? (must of just been 6-pak, not master) I could understand if someone from FL didn't know it, but in your area, as well as mine, you should take fog seriously. Never saw closest point of approach abbreviated. Got the license in the usual way... box of cereal, right? Fog seriously? Naw, just the big ships in it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message
news:Rz9bf.420601$tl2.192513@pd7tw3no... Capt. JG wrote: "Gary" wrote in message news:fd7bf.409721$oW2.156691@pd7tw1no... I think Brian is mostly referring to the bickering part - I apologize for my part in it. I think it's generally a worthwhile discussion of RofR situations. Sometimes the situation is not straightforward of course, and it requires some quick thinking. When I'm teaching, it's not atypical that we're in the midst of significant traffic with a number of different types of vessels... anything from tankers going in both directions, even three sometimes, to sailboats and cabin cruiser types, to small dinghies and human power boats, and even swimmers. I'll typically ask my students, who has stand-on or give way status for a particular boat, say port over starboard, then ask them about another boat coming from a different direction, then about the ferry, then about the kayaker, etc. It makes for an interesting sail if nothing else. When you are teaching multiple target situations, how do you prioritize them? Do you run plots with time to CPA? I have a hard time explaining to my watchkeepers that the closest is not always the most threatening and that whatever they do it has to not compound the next situation. Not familiar with the term CPA. Since this is a teaching situation, I try not to get them into a situation that is going to be overwhelming. We look at potential collision courses of the targets first, then I have them sort out plans of action. You're right of course. Many times, it's not the closest that one needs to be mindful of.. we also try and make an assessment about the level of knowledge on the other boat. Sometimes it's a shock when they do or don't do the right thing. :-) Closest Point of Approach Ahh... thanks. We don't do formal ones during the on-the-water class. Eyeball only. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Larry wrote:
Gary wrote in news:D44bf.417596$tl2.177416@pd7tw3no: Narrow Channels--International All this is great....if you're a ship from Le Havre. But, the jetski guy has his South Carolina Dept of Natural Resources, Boater's Handbook. (The guy on the sailboat probably doesn't have anything...and I'm serious.) Whatever bureaucrats are in charge locally are the ones that set the rules and bust them in the harbor and ICW. No boater safety course actually teaches these International Rules. So, the rules he goes by (assuming he goes by rules and is a nice guy with family out for a PWC cruise, not some freak, which most of them really are not) is the Boater's Handbook DNR handed him when he took his 2 sons to the PWC training course DNR ran at the high school so the boys could get their little DNR drivers permits. It says 50' from boats and docks and 200' from marinas. This nonsense of 8 layers of rule-making bureaucrats, all different in every fiefdom you boat across, is REALLY STUPID!! Naw, it's the only way to sentance young Johnny to a day or two of trial and similar imprisonment or even fines for driving a jski like a, well, you know. Even just paying legal fees to not show up... 'snot worth a charter challenge, y'know? To some the only real punishment possible is being kept waiting beside the road for 20 minutes to sign for a ticket. Daddy's guy pops a chzek, and I'm Bob's boy again! But it gives an honest cop motivation to try to 'help' a few who might just kill themselves if they don't get a good talking to, possibly even to shoot a few suspects evading arrest. Rule 1 in the book is really "Do everything you can to avoid a collision, unless you are protecting the flag carrier." New robotic insects will telemeter odours as well as high quality vidio and audio to headquarters and nearby patrol vessels. Not all them skeeters is real. It's getting to be such a madhouse out here on the water that they are going to install bouyed lanes, like streets, in some areas, with speed limits and photoradar lights here and there, and helicopter camera and gun ship patrols, who will soon be overburdened and overbudgeted by medical rescues and evacuations. The photoradar fines will show up in your income tax, property tax, auto permit fees, and insurance premiums. They will even garnishee your X's support payments, but not your child support. Sailboats are, of course, to be avoided at all costs, have complete right of way, and are not so regulated. N'yah, N'yahh, N'ya N'ya N'Yahhhh! International boundary crossings must be authorised by automatic cell picturephone optional service documentation, six week setup required, pay per use, paypal required, or those crossing the line will be boarded. If your cell account application and passport quality photograph isn't notarized, witnessed, vetted, approved, enabled, vetted again and authorized, promulgated and verified biometrically, you will be boarded. Except for sailboats, who may zig zag wherever the hell they think the wind, rocks and compass pertubations want them to, so there. They have an express line to customs and a toll free number, too. They have their own rules about survival in the wind, and how to avoid each other. Some required turns could need to be initiated a mile in advance of heavy vessels, for a sailor to avoid being inadverdently mashed by an encumbered vessel in who's wind shadow they could become becalmed, and it's you who must avoid their attempts to non the less make time to weather, wherever their anchorage may be. God rest them all, safe at hawser's end, and thee, brother. Even if you have to go 100 extra yards to do it, even if you have to back up in your lane to make a hole in traffic, you got to do it. It's the law, Billy. God help you if you scratch their gelcoat, even shake their stirred martinii with wake. Damages is damages, and gin is expensive, too expensive to be ruined by you. (insert razzzzzberry, here) Sailors shouldn't need to look out for whirly gigs or steamboats, we can't get away, and can't catch you. Most of you are too hard to see, are our sails? All you need is to tongue your fly by wire joystick and Mr. Scott will beam you past us, right? Behind us, that is, it being safer, all 'round. Well clear. If the cook's flag is flying, you must not over agitate the poaching eggs with a heavy wake, right? If you know sailing, it is easy to differentiate a true sailboat from a stickboat, or motor sailer, who will endeavour to behave as a powerboat, but who is still capable of being spun about by the wake of a helicopter, or even broached, then reversed if they suddenly and unexpected must turn ever so slightly to avoid you avoiding that dead head he saw 20 minutes ago and still can't seem to get around, what with the current, and wind shiftiness, and all. Sailors called Kite skiers usually have the highest priority, being essentially pedestrians, or potential aspiring pedestrians, most of the time. To whom would you bitch if you ran over some stupid swimmer's head and the steel plate in his old veteran's head should scratch your epoxy coated prop? All considered, the best weapon on a boat is a yard sprayer full of gasoline. What about them Pelicans, eh? Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in
ink.net: I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. This isn't about "me". I was simply stating the local rules. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Capt. JG" wrote in
: Larry, if you or anyone else really thought I was serious, then you have more problems that can be solved here. -- Oh. It's very hard to tell who's serious and who's just trolling, given I've seen this belligerent attitude problem on both sides of the issue out on the harbor. -- Larry |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. I sail in a bay, not on the road. Does your little toy jet ski have wheels? SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Gary wrote:
DSK wrote: Bill McKee wrote: I may get a minority of the blame Nah, majority. ... but he CAN NOT CHANGE DIRECTION IN FRONT OF THE OVERTAKING BOAT! He gets the majority of the fault. Please cite the ColReg which says so. DSK Rule 17 Action by Stand-on Vessel (a)(i) Where one of two vessels is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course and speed. You guys are being really silly. The boat that is overtaking has to avoid the boat being overtaken regardless of what the overtaken boat does. If the overtaking boat does not avoid the boat he is overtaking then he is at fault. Also the ColRegs advise that the overtaking boat should signal to indicate intentions. How often is that done? And I don't mean signaling like the menhaden boat that wanted to pass us coming into the Greater Wicomico by giving 5 blasts on the horn because he wanted to go straight up the river and didn't want to deviate around us although he had plenty of room to do so since we were on the extreme starboard edge of the marked channel. Technically we should have maintained course and speed. But what we really did was circle out of the marked channel (since there was sufficient water over there) Suppose there are two power boats in a narrow channel. Boat B is behind boat A and wants to overtake. So Boat B expects Boat A to maintain course and speed. BUT... the channel turns. Boat A is NOT expected to maintain course and speed so that it runs into the channel bank. Moreover when passing in a narrow channel, it makes it much easier on everyone if boat A cuts back on his speed to let boat B pass. Regardless of what the ColRegs say. grandma Rosalie |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"DSK" wrote in message
.. . Bill McKee wrote: I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But a car can be a boat. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"DSK" wrote in message .. . Bill McKee wrote: I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But passing is passing. And a car can be a boat. Both the Amphicar, and a couple models lately out of Cuba, and did you ever see a 1957 Buick? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb
who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
DSK you are a pompus ass.
"DSK" wrote in message ... At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote
I guess you never pass on a 2 lane road. Both oncoming and same direction traffic. Hey Bill. Here it is for you ins very simple terms A boat is NOT a car. DSK But passing is passing. Where Bill boats they have yellow lines painted on the water. And traffic lights at the intersections. I really believe he has turn signals on his boat. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Maybe, but he's right.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bert Robbins" wrote in message . .. DSK you are a pompus ass. "DSK" wrote in message ... At this point, you've made it quite obvious that you are a clueless feeb who is never going to get a clue, no matter how patiently it is explained to you. But for the benefit of others, I'm going to go just a bit further here. A boat is NOT a car. Bill McKee wrote: But passing is passing. No, it is not. If you would drive a boat at 60 mph just a few feet from another boat... or any object in the water... then you should be physically restrained from operating a boat since you are a deadly hazard to yourself and others. Are cars affected by wakes? Currents? Leeway? Do boats have brakes? Suppose you "pass" another boat, just as you wuould in a car, at the same moment a wake strikes that other boat and causes it to slew 20 degrees momentarily? Or just when your own boat meets a wake? If you overtake another vessel in such a way that you cannot avoid that vessel if his boat turns, or rolls, or side-slips, or has some minor equipment failure, the *you* have acted dangerously and incompetently. DSK |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com