![]() |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... "Jim Carter" wrote in message .. . "Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... So my "power boat" is not a power boat for rules when the motor is turned off and I am drifting? Bill, have you read the Collision Regulations and do you not understand them? Have you read the correct terminology that is fully explained in these regulations? If not, why don't you get a copy of them and read them from cover to cover so that you are better informed before you write such questions as you wrote above. Everything that you are asking is fully explained in the Collision Regulations. For example, your question that you are now asking is explained in Rule 3 General Definitions (a) Got that Bill? Jim C. Can you answer my question? Is a power boat a power boat with the engine off or in neutral? It is a raft. Got that Jim? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag
or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. Dare I ask, then why do you own a PWC? ;) SBV Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Beat me to it! I hate to join a choir late, but...
Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Wow - this is amazing. Terry, my analogy below was bad as it turns out. You might have a better chance getting the pig to sing..... Billy, could you PLEASE give us all some idea of where you might be so I can NEVER go there? Matt Colie - See Prior sig Bill McKee wrote: "next.victim" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Terry, Very well said, but save your bandwidth. (Teaching a pig to sing and such.) Billy believes he was the right(maybe the requirement) to take any vessel anywhere close aboard at flank speed. He is convinced that, if a vessel has any machinery onboard, it does not qualify as a vessel undersail regardless of the situation. He has proven he is not capable of interpreting Colregs the same way as the OMI to whom I wrote the pages of my license examinations. I just wish he had said where he is so we could all avoid him. Matt Colie - See prior sigs - I'm tired of this. Terry Spragg wrote: at least it was on topic! NI! Terry K Bill McKee wrote: Was on topic, but sailboats can not turn as wanted, the rest of the world be damned. Bill McKee wrote: Throttle off, no control, turning radius about a boat length. Well, if you put it that way, it sounds like it should be right, and logically, it is exactly correct, and if you read what you wrote, you may see why it is so funny, that you bite your own tail. Sailboats can not just turn, (or not turn,) as wanted. They are overpowered by the wind all the time. The wind blows sailboats around like leaves sometimes. As a mariner, you are expected to understand that, anticipate it, and survive the hazards anyway. Overtaking vessels must keep clear, sail or power. If they cannot, they must slow down to a safe speed, even stop. Chewy beans. You are expected and required to understand sail and power, and all their constraints, or stay home. Sailboats flop about out of control from time to time, motor on or off, whenever the sails are up and the wind is alive, it is the nature of the game: 15 HP auxiliary engines, thousand HP wild winds, waves, sails, ropes, winches, flying fish, nature, etc, etc. You understand, don't you? If not, you should not be in command on the water. What you don't seem to grasp is that no one except possibly you, would purposely hit someone with a car or boat, just because they were ****ed off and somehow surmise that they are in the right, have the right of way, and therefore, have a license to kill anyone who does not stay out of your way, regardless. This attitude you seemingly cherish may well cause you to spend the latter years of your life locked in a cell being raped by real nasty *******s with really big muscles and real nasty diseases. On the evidence you provide, I would bet two cents you are prettier than you are smart. On the water, all the regulations in the world are there to settle lawsuits after damages occur, and to impress on mariners that collisions are to be avoided by any means, at all costs, regardless of the causes. The reason why should be obvious. A collision at sea can ruin your whole life. Like being bitten by a dog, it can change your attitude forever, the hard way. Don't feel too bad, even real sea captains sometimes hit other ships, and blow cities like Halifax all to hell, because they make little mistakes early on, and suddenly find they cannot avoid the other guy's similar idiocy. We are all human, right? 'Course, those arrogant guys usually end up losing their nice cushy seat at the Captain's table, and deservedly so. Some commit suicide once their role in disaster becomes obvious. These men have consciences, at least. Some of their very cushy seats disappear below the titanic icy waves as they sit in them, along with thousands of their passengers. Icebergs and the wind just don't care. It is left to us to be responsible, considerate, cautious and courteous. Some grow up earlier than others. Some never make it. Fair winds to you, and the best of luck, for all our sakes. Your skills, knowledge and attitude probably won't help you, your passengers, or locals much. Old sailors would treat you like a rock awash, if you would just keep still. Otherwise, we fear for you. Terry K Bite Me. propulsion motor on, equal power boat. A GIANT NOPE! See (c) below, Read it carefully, it was written by a maritime lawyer. Mr. McKee, I would be forced to determine that what has previously been said is completely accurate, and given this case, I would have to find a judgement against you. Please go to: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navru...les/Rule03.htm below is exerted from the above: For the purpose of these Rules and this Chapter [Inld], except where the context otherwise requires: (a) The word "vessel" includes every description of watercraft, including non-displacement craft, WIG craft [Intl], and seaplanes, used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water. (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. (c) The term "sailing vessel" means any vessel under sail provided that propelling machinery, if fitted, is not being used. Unquote- I find the above parts b & c to be clear and compelling. In the case of being used, the only interpretation possible for “propelling machinery” would be the case that said machinery was actually providing the driving force to propel said vessel. I my have no authority here, but I strongly recommend that you deal with your issues as you have presented yourself to be a clear and present hazzard as the operator of a vessel underpower. Name withheld by authors request And your motor is not propelling machinery? Only if it is engaged and capable of overcoming the power of the wind. So my "power boat" is not a power boat for rules when the motor is turned off and I am drifting? That's right. You become a vessel not under command, I believe. To the outside world, you could be injured, ill, asleep, or having fallen off miles before your boat ran out of gas, a pedestrian. You will be given every consideration and possibly a tow home, a coffee, and a chance to use the head, even a warm berth along with a warm blankey, even a medicinal dose of brandy, splints for your broken bones, even the "breath of life", provided the tanker can get stopped before mashing you. Unfortunately, sailboats probably do not carry enough fuel to replenish your tanks sufficiently to get you home, else you might get some of it, too. At sea, Billy, pedestrians have the absolute, inarguable right of way;-) To run over one, even in the dark, is manslaughter if he dies, even if he does make an unexpected turn in front of you. Negligent manslaughter, if you were not keeping an adequate lookout, or were running at excessive speed under the circumstances, which is almost the same as murder. The regulations govern men, not boats. Those who can manouver best have the most responsibility to avoid hazards. It makes sense, if you think about it, and if you read the rules carefully and with an open mind you will see it plain. You are right, sailing vessels cannot turn whenever they want. Nor can they always prevent turns whenever they want, thanks to the wind and other obstacles. Surely your position is not that sailors do not have the same right to enjoy the water as do power boaters? It is said among sailors that essentially we ignore power boats simply because we have no choise, being at their mercey. We sailors cannot outrun, avoid, or catch high powered boats except possibly double reefed in a steady gale where you might be puking up your guts amidst the rollers, unable to maintain any speed at all whilst struggling to survive in your fair weather speedboat. Circumstances rule boats. Men do what they can. The rest is common sense. The colregs are common sense, written by lawyers, maritime lawyers at that, and are therefore unintelligible to most mere mortal landlubbers. Don't feel bad. Furthermore, the regs have been argued by better men than us, for hundreds of years, and reflect the findings of numerous lawsuits, trials, boards of inquiry, courts martial, et al. They must be read with painful attention to the merest comma. You must realize too, that power boat regulations are somewhat junior to those governing sail, which I gather you could never understand, since you do not appreciate the realities of sail, nor probably of power for that matter. Your jet boat is a dangerous toy. You must understand that sailboats, even with their engines engaged, try as they might, may not actually be being propelled under control of the engine, but may well be in the teeth of the unco-operative wind and may be struggling with control. It is a part of sailing, like rocks awash. Even if they were after you, you could always stay out of reach, eh? Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in
ink.net: "otnmbrd" wrote in message news: snip , and I send you back to rule 2. otn And a stupid guy who is motoring with his sails up is going to run day signals or lights? LOL! G Didn't really expect you to grasp the point being made. otn |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"The_Giz" wrote in message
... also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. Dare I ask, then why do you own a PWC? ;) SBV Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. If they were the only people who owned them, I would be quite happy. Clearly, you're not one of them. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"otnmbrd" wrote in message
25.201... "Bill McKee" wrote in ink.net: "otnmbrd" wrote in message news: snip , and I send you back to rule 2. otn And a stupid guy who is motoring with his sails up is going to run day signals or lights? LOL! G Didn't really expect you to grasp the point being made. otn I think he has mental problems... -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
"otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... "Bill McKee" wrote in message hlink.net... And your motor is not propelling machinery? No, Bill, a motor is not propelling machinery, nor is a propeller, propelling machinery, but used together, they become propelling machinery. Just for kicks, let's get a bit more complicated. The only way you can be certain (reasonably) under the Rules, that a sail vessel is also being powered by some mechanical means other than the sails, is, in daylight, a cone, apex down; at night, she's lit as a power driven vessel; or radio communications. Barring any of those (excluding some sailboat making 10k in a 1k breeze... possible exceptions noted) you should consider the sailboat just that ..... a sailboat, and I send you back to rule 2. otn And a stupid guy who is motoring with his sails up is going to run day signals or lights? LOL! Well, maybe not if he has a stupid greedy lawyer, and and you do too, and it all winds up in court, IF there were damages that might have been avoided, or settled beforhand. If he's smart enough to know that there is sufficient wind (in his locality) that he may be deflected from his intended course by the wind, and is using his trolling motor, he may hoist a powering cone to let you know that he is probably able to manouver better than he could without an engine, but you should be able to tell, anyway, just from looking, that he has a sail in the air, seems to be going too fast for the wind, and may get farted on by the wind. If he has a need for the engine in light airs, he probably has a big suit of sails up, and is most vulnerable to a gust or turbulence from trees half a mile away, etc. Got it? He may be almost out of gas, can't charge his battery, and needs to hoist a sail, so needs to turn into the wind soon, because of tides and rocks awash. He may need 6 feet of water, or could soon be a pedestrian. He may not have any juke box money, either, because he spent it all on charts. You do have charts on board? A smart powerboater would have no question in his mind; sail in the air is a hazard, keep very clear, if you can or slow down, under pain of responsibility. It's usually not a personal problem, is it? You got gas, you got a steering wheel, eh? Your wrists are not as limp as your brain, are they? Or is that your dick sticking up through your collar? Now, stop chewing your own tail, or you'll grow hair on your nose and go blind. Which brings us back to that age old question, "Why do old sea dogs lick their own balls?" Remember, to start with, only half of them do. Consider yourself bitten. Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Terry,
This has been amazingly amuzing, shall we divert this here to a new case? Billy is fishing from his drifting jetski (or what ever) and a sailboat with no sails is approaching with no change in bearing. He is not worried because he can see smoke at he transom. After all he is fishing so the sailboat is the burden vessel here. What little Billy has not bothered to notice is the the line (he calls it rope) that is drifting in front of the sailboat. He is also absolutely certain that Colregs part 3.d means that he has no requirement to avoid the closing vessel. If you can only read one line at time, it might be an honest mistake. Questions: 1 - What is proper way for the anchored ketch to avoid a collision. 2 - Why is there no standing lookout in a part 202.50 anchorage? 3 - Who is tending the barbaque? (instead of watching for boats drifting into the anchorage? Matt Colie Terry Spragg wrote: Beat me to it! I hate to join a choir late, but... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Wow - this is amazing. Terry, my analogy below was bad as it turns out. You might have a better chance getting the pig to sing..... Billy, could you PLEASE give us all some idea of where you might be so I can NEVER go there? Matt Colie - See Prior sig Bill McKee wrote: "next.victim" wrote in message ... Bill McKee wrote: "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... Terry, Very well said, but save your bandwidth. (Teaching a pig to sing and such.) Billy believes he was the right(maybe the requirement) to take any vessel anywhere close aboard at flank speed. He is convinced that, if a vessel has any machinery onboard, it does not qualify as a vessel undersail regardless of the situation. He has proven he is not capable of interpreting Colregs the same way as the OMI to whom I wrote the pages of my license examinations. I just wish he had said where he is so we could all avoid him. Matt Colie - See prior sigs - I'm tired of this. Terry Spragg wrote: at least it was on topic! NI! Terry K Bill McKee wrote: Was on topic, but sailboats can not turn as wanted, the rest of the world be damned. Bill McKee wrote: Throttle off, no control, turning radius about a boat length. Well, if you put it that way, it sounds like it should be right, and logically, it is exactly correct, and if you read what you wrote, you may see why it is so funny, that you bite your own tail. Sailboats can not just turn, (or not turn,) as wanted. They are overpowered by the wind all the time. The wind blows sailboats around like leaves sometimes. As a mariner, you are expected to understand that, anticipate it, and survive the hazards anyway. Overtaking vessels must keep clear, sail or power. If they cannot, they must slow down to a safe speed, even stop. Chewy beans. You are expected and required to understand sail and power, and all their constraints, or stay home. Sailboats flop about out of control from time to time, motor on or off, whenever the sails are up and the wind is alive, it is the nature of the game: 15 HP auxiliary engines, thousand HP wild winds, waves, sails, ropes, winches, flying fish, nature, etc, etc. You understand, don't you? If not, you should not be in command on the water. What you don't seem to grasp is that no one except possibly you, would purposely hit someone with a car or boat, just because they were ****ed off and somehow surmise that they are in the right, have the right of way, and therefore, have a license to kill anyone who does not stay out of your way, regardless. This attitude you seemingly cherish may well cause you to spend the latter years of your life locked in a cell being raped by real nasty *******s with really big muscles and real nasty diseases. On the evidence you provide, I would bet two cents you are prettier than you are smart. On the water, all the regulations in the world are there to settle lawsuits after damages occur, and to impress on mariners that collisions are to be avoided by any means, at all costs, regardless of the causes. The reason why should be obvious. A collision at sea can ruin your whole life. Like being bitten by a dog, it can change your attitude forever, the hard way. Don't feel too bad, even real sea captains sometimes hit other ships, and blow cities like Halifax all to hell, because they make little mistakes early on, and suddenly find they cannot avoid the other guy's similar idiocy. We are all human, right? 'Course, those arrogant guys usually end up losing their nice cushy seat at the Captain's table, and deservedly so. Some commit suicide once their role in disaster becomes obvious. These men have consciences, at least. Some of their very cushy seats disappear below the titanic icy waves as they sit in them, along with thousands of their passengers. Icebergs and the wind just don't care. It is left to us to be responsible, considerate, cautious and courteous. Some grow up earlier than others. Some never make it. Fair winds to you, and the best of luck, for all our sakes. Your skills, knowledge and attitude probably won't help you, your passengers, or locals much. Old sailors would treat you like a rock awash, if you would just keep still. Otherwise, we fear for you. Terry K Bite Me. propulsion motor on, equal power boat. A GIANT NOPE! See (c) below, Read it carefully, it was written by a maritime lawyer. Mr. McKee, I would be forced to determine that what has previously been said is completely accurate, and given this case, I would have to find a judgement against you. Please go to: http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/mwv/navru...les/Rule03.htm below is exerted from the above: For the purpose of these Rules and this Chapter [Inld], except where the context otherwise requires: (a) The word "vessel" includes every description of watercraft, including non-displacement craft, WIG craft [Intl], and seaplanes, used or capable of being used as a means of transportation on water. (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. (c) The term "sailing vessel" means any vessel under sail provided that propelling machinery, if fitted, is not being used. Unquote- I find the above parts b & c to be clear and compelling. In the case of being used, the only interpretation possible for “propelling machinery” would be the case that said machinery was actually providing the driving force to propel said vessel. I my have no authority here, but I strongly recommend that you deal with your issues as you have presented yourself to be a clear and present hazzard as the operator of a vessel underpower. Name withheld by authors request And your motor is not propelling machinery? Only if it is engaged and capable of overcoming the power of the wind. So my "power boat" is not a power boat for rules when the motor is turned off and I am drifting? That's right. You become a vessel not under command, I believe. To the outside world, you could be injured, ill, asleep, or having fallen off miles before your boat ran out of gas, a pedestrian. You will be given every consideration and possibly a tow home, a coffee, and a chance to use the head, even a warm berth along with a warm blankey, even a medicinal dose of brandy, splints for your broken bones, even the "breath of life", provided the tanker can get stopped before mashing you. Unfortunately, sailboats probably do not carry enough fuel to replenish your tanks sufficiently to get you home, else you might get some of it, too. At sea, Billy, pedestrians have the absolute, inarguable right of way;-) To run over one, even in the dark, is manslaughter if he dies, even if he does make an unexpected turn in front of you. Negligent manslaughter, if you were not keeping an adequate lookout, or were running at excessive speed under the circumstances, which is almost the same as murder. The regulations govern men, not boats. Those who can manouver best have the most responsibility to avoid hazards. It makes sense, if you think about it, and if you read the rules carefully and with an open mind you will see it plain. You are right, sailing vessels cannot turn whenever they want. Nor can they always prevent turns whenever they want, thanks to the wind and other obstacles. Surely your position is not that sailors do not have the same right to enjoy the water as do power boaters? It is said among sailors that essentially we ignore power boats simply because we have no choise, being at their mercey. We sailors cannot outrun, avoid, or catch high powered boats except possibly double reefed in a steady gale where you might be puking up your guts amidst the rollers, unable to maintain any speed at all whilst struggling to survive in your fair weather speedboat. Circumstances rule boats. Men do what they can. The rest is common sense. The colregs are common sense, written by lawyers, maritime lawyers at that, and are therefore unintelligible to most mere mortal landlubbers. Don't feel bad. Furthermore, the regs have been argued by better men than us, for hundreds of years, and reflect the findings of numerous lawsuits, trials, boards of inquiry, courts martial, et al. They must be read with painful attention to the merest comma. You must realize too, that power boat regulations are somewhat junior to those governing sail, which I gather you could never understand, since you do not appreciate the realities of sail, nor probably of power for that matter. Your jet boat is a dangerous toy. You must understand that sailboats, even with their engines engaged, try as they might, may not actually be being propelled under control of the engine, but may well be in the teeth of the unco-operative wind and may be struggling with control. It is a part of sailing, like rocks awash. Even if they were after you, you could always stay out of reach, eh? Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message hlink.net... (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. And your motor is not propelling machinery? Try reading (b) again. And your motor is not propelling machinery? I guess a power boat like mine is not a power boat when the motor is turned off or not in gear. So you hit a drift fishing "Power boat" who has his motor off or in not in gear, who is at fault. Billy. How old are you? Is it time for school yet? When a bicycle runs into a parked car who is at fault? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Capt. JG wrote:
"Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message thlink.net... (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. And your motor is not propelling machinery? Try reading (b) again. And your motor is not propelling machinery? I guess a power boat like mine is not a power boat when the motor is turned off or not in gear. So you hit a drift fishing "Power boat" who has his motor off or in not in gear, who is at fault. Are you really that stupid or are you just trolling? "vessel propelled by machinery" When your vessel's engine is off and/or you're not using it to move the vessel and you're not at anchor or at the dock, you're considered to be a vessel not under command. Fishing boats have special status... look up commercial fishing vessel engaged in fishing. Wrong on both counts. A vessel with the engine off is underway not making way. To be NUC your engine has to be broken. Fishing boats only have special status if they fit the legal discription of fishing. A boat "drift fishing" does not. Better give those rules a re-read. Gaz |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message .. . "Bill McKee" wrote in message link.net... So my "power boat" is not a power boat for rules when the motor is turned off and I am drifting? Bill, have you read the Collision Regulations and do you not understand them? Have you read the correct terminology that is fully explained in these regulations? If not, why don't you get a copy of them and read them from cover to cover so that you are better informed before you write such questions as you wrote above. Everything that you are asking is fully explained in the Collision Regulations. For example, your question that you are now asking is explained in Rule 3 General Definitions (a) Got that Bill? Jim C. Can you answer my question? Is a power boat a power boat with the engine off or in neutral? Got that Jim? Power boat, underway but not making way. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"The_Giz" wrote in message ... also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. Dare I ask, then why do you own a PWC? ;) SBV Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. you didn't answer my question. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Matt Colie wrote:
Terry, This has been amazingly amuzing, shall we divert this here to a new case? Billy is fishing from his drifting jetski (or what ever) and a sailboat with no sails is approaching with no change in bearing. He is not worried because he can see smoke at he transom. After all he is fishing so the sailboat is the burden vessel here. What little Billy has not bothered to notice is the the line (he calls it rope) that is drifting in front of the sailboat. He is also absolutely certain that Colregs part 3.d means that he has no requirement to avoid the closing vessel. If you can only read one line at time, it might be an honest mistake. Questions: 1 - What is proper way for the anchored ketch to avoid a collision. 2 - Why is there no standing lookout in a part 202.50 anchorage? 3 - Who is tending the barbaque? (instead of watching for boats drifting into the anchorage? Matt Colie That's "barbeque", Billy. I bet we could go on and on, but well,,, (Yawn) nawwww... I would just let him get close, then spray him with gasoline from my legal fire arm garden sprayer, or give him a "backside" from the poop cannon, Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk... Terry K |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "The_Giz" wrote in message ... also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. Dare I ask, then why do you own a PWC? ;) SBV Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. If they were the only people who owned them, I would be quite happy. Clearly, you're not one of them. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com Which point would you like to wager on... wealth or intelligence? Perhaps both? CLEARLY you attempt to state facts when you don't even have the first clue. Or as they say, you know not of what you speak. Tis a shame. Giz |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. you didn't answer my question. SBV Because you haven't asked *ME* anything.... |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
And your motor is not propelling machinery? Maybe What does the "propellor" do? And why do they call it that? DSK |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Gary" wrote in message news:eP8gf.551819$oW2.504551@pd7tw1no... Bill McKee wrote: "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message thlink.net... (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. And your motor is not propelling machinery? Try reading (b) again. And your motor is not propelling machinery? I guess a power boat like mine is not a power boat when the motor is turned off or not in gear. So you hit a drift fishing "Power boat" who has his motor off or in not in gear, who is at fault. Billy. How old are you? Is it time for school yet? When a bicycle runs into a parked car who is at fault? If in California the car may be at fault. ;) Let's ask the question about bikes and pedestrians. Refer to California. 1)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 2)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street on the side walk and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 3) You are driving down the street and a pedestrian runs out from between 2 cars and you collide. Who is at fault? |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Peter Wiley" wrote in message . .. In article . net, Bill McKee wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... "Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... And what did the civil court award to the PWC? And you figure your motor is not propelling equipment? I don't know what he figures, but unless my motor, running or not, is turning my propeller whilst sailing for the express purpose of moving my vessel, then I am a sailboat. otn Better do a little research. Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa. This from a moron operator of a PWC, to a licensed all oceans ships master and pilot? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I'd tell Bill to get a clue, but he couldn't manage that if it was stuck to his forehead with duct tape. PDW He is an incompetant master and pilot, and is only trying to project that he has a 100 ton license. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Terry Spragg" wrote in message ... Matt Colie wrote: Terry, This has been amazingly amuzing, shall we divert this here to a new case? Billy is fishing from his drifting jetski (or what ever) and a sailboat with no sails is approaching with no change in bearing. He is not worried because he can see smoke at he transom. After all he is fishing so the sailboat is the burden vessel here. What little Billy has not bothered to notice is the the line (he calls it rope) that is drifting in front of the sailboat. He is also absolutely certain that Colregs part 3.d means that he has no requirement to avoid the closing vessel. If you can only read one line at time, it might be an honest mistake. Questions: 1 - What is proper way for the anchored ketch to avoid a collision. 2 - Why is there no standing lookout in a part 202.50 anchorage? 3 - Who is tending the barbaque? (instead of watching for boats drifting into the anchorage? Matt Colie That's "barbeque", Billy. I bet we could go on and on, but well,,, (Yawn) nawwww... I would just let him get close, then spray him with gasoline from my legal fire arm garden sprayer, or give him a "backside" from the poop cannon, Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk... Terry K http://www.spinnaker-sailing.com/les.../k_lessone.htm |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Terry Spragg" wrote in message ... Matt Colie wrote: Terry, This has been amazingly amuzing, shall we divert this here to a new case? Billy is fishing from his drifting jetski (or what ever) and a sailboat with no sails is approaching with no change in bearing. He is not worried because he can see smoke at he transom. After all he is fishing so the sailboat is the burden vessel here. What little Billy has not bothered to notice is the the line (he calls it rope) that is drifting in front of the sailboat. He is also absolutely certain that Colregs part 3.d means that he has no requirement to avoid the closing vessel. If you can only read one line at time, it might be an honest mistake. Questions: 1 - What is proper way for the anchored ketch to avoid a collision. 2 - Why is there no standing lookout in a part 202.50 anchorage? 3 - Who is tending the barbaque? (instead of watching for boats drifting into the anchorage? Matt Colie That's "barbeque", Billy. I bet we could go on and on, but well,,, (Yawn) nawwww... I would just let him get close, then spray him with gasoline from my legal fire arm garden sprayer, or give him a "backside" from the poop cannon, Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk... Terry K http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~wp...g/StartUp.html |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Terry Spragg" wrote in message ... Matt Colie wrote: Terry, This has been amazingly amuzing, shall we divert this here to a new case? Billy is fishing from his drifting jetski (or what ever) and a sailboat with no sails is approaching with no change in bearing. He is not worried because he can see smoke at he transom. After all he is fishing so the sailboat is the burden vessel here. What little Billy has not bothered to notice is the the line (he calls it rope) that is drifting in front of the sailboat. He is also absolutely certain that Colregs part 3.d means that he has no requirement to avoid the closing vessel. If you can only read one line at time, it might be an honest mistake. Questions: 1 - What is proper way for the anchored ketch to avoid a collision. 2 - Why is there no standing lookout in a part 202.50 anchorage? 3 - Who is tending the barbaque? (instead of watching for boats drifting into the anchorage? Matt Colie That's "barbeque", Billy. I bet we could go on and on, but well,,, (Yawn) nawwww... I would just let him get close, then spray him with gasoline from my legal fire arm garden sprayer, or give him a "backside" from the poop cannon, Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk... Terry K http://www.kget.com/guides/outdoor/s...3-15172006E3DA |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Bill McKee wrote:
"Gary" wrote in message news:eP8gf.551819$oW2.504551@pd7tw1no... Bill McKee wrote: "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bill McKee" wrote in message rthlink.net... (b) The term "power-driven vessel" means any vessel propelled by machinery. And your motor is not propelling machinery? Try reading (b) again. And your motor is not propelling machinery? I guess a power boat like mine is not a power boat when the motor is turned off or not in gear. So you hit a drift fishing "Power boat" who has his motor off or in not in gear, who is at fault. Billy. How old are you? Is it time for school yet? When a bicycle runs into a parked car who is at fault? If in California the car may be at fault. ;) Let's ask the question about bikes and pedestrians. Refer to California. 1)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 2)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street on the side walk and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 3) You are driving down the street and a pedestrian runs out from between 2 cars and you collide. Who is at fault? I don't know anything about California law but I know the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at sea. You don't. |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote in
news: "otnmbrd" wrote in message news: I don't know what he figures, but unless my motor, running or not, is turning my propeller whilst sailing for the express purpose of moving my vessel, then I am a sailboat. otn Better do a little research. Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa. This from a moron operator of a PWC, to a licensed all oceans ships master and pilot? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I'd tell Bill to get a clue, but he couldn't manage that if it was stuck to his forehead with duct tape. PDW He is an incompetant master and pilot, and is only trying to project that he has a 100 ton license. ROFLMAO otn |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"The_Giz" wrote in message ... Many of the wealthiest and most intelligent people in the world own PWC's. Agreed... they keep them on their yacht (s). I especially like the shot of the two Yami's sitting alongside Paul Allen's Octopus. you didn't answer my question. SBV Because you haven't asked *ME* anything.... Here's a hint, look for the sentence preceding the question mark. SBV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Bill McKee" wrote Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa. This from a moron operator of a PWC, to a licensed all oceans ships master and pilot? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I'd tell Bill to get a clue, but he couldn't manage that if it was stuck to his forehead with duct tape. PDW He is an incompetant master and pilot, and is only trying to project that he has a 100 ton license. One can only hope that the two of you meet up someday.......on the ocean. Scotty |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article . net, Bill
McKee wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message nk.net... "Bill McKee" wrote in message nk.net... And what did the civil court award to the PWC? And you figure your motor is not propelling equipment? I don't know what he figures, but unless my motor, running or not, is turning my propeller whilst sailing for the express purpose of moving my vessel, then I am a sailboat. otn Better do a little research. Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa. This from a moron operator of a PWC, to a licensed all oceans ships master and pilot? Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. I'd tell Bill to get a clue, but he couldn't manage that if it was stuck to his forehead with duct tape. PDW |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article , Scotty
wrote: wrote ... Everybody on the Internet is a member of Mensa. I don't know about that - I'm not, didn't keep up the dues because I wasn't really getting much out of it - didn't need to join another club and go to meetings and events because my life is already pretty full with the day job, wife, kids, working weekends as a musician, and boating. But I was a member for a year or two, just a few years back; I just took the entrance test out of curiosity and pride (egotism I guess), was pretty sure I'd get in and I did. Then I found out that I didn't even need to take the test, could have gotten in just by showing my SAT results, also in the top 2% percentile of the population....not to brag or anything, but someone in the post earlier questioned my intelligence, and believe me, it's not in question. Dare I ask, then why do you own a PWC? Easy one, Scotty. He hasn't the money for anything that goes faster and weighs more, and he hasn't the skill, or patience to obtain the skill, to use a sailboat. PDW |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article ,
The_Giz wrote: If they were the only people who owned them, I would be quite happy. Clearly, you're not one of them. Which point would you like to wager on... wealth or intelligence? Perhaps both? In your case, it's obvious which you lack. CLEARLY you attempt to state facts when you don't even have the first clue. Or as they say, you know not of what you speak. Tis a shame. Give me a break. This is Usenet. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article . net,
Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: If in California the car may be at fault. ;) Let's ask the question about bikes and pedestrians. Refer to California. 1)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 2)You are driving down the street and a bike is coming down the other street on the side walk and runs the stop sign and you collide. Who is at fault? 3) You are driving down the street and a pedestrian runs out from between 2 cars and you collide. Who is at fault? I'd rather talk about sailing. I'm sure you're an expert when it comes to colliding bikes and cars. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article t,
Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: Billy, why don't you just run along back to your fellow retards with PWC now, OK? It's obvious you're out of your depth here. PDW Well, since you have already proved you are unknowing in the rules of road, regards sailboats, I am going to ignore you from now on. And when you get in an accident with your ideas of right of way, and I see a report, I will just have them google up your idiocy. Ah, I get it Peter... he's just a troll. Not too bright either. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Peter Wiley wrote:
.... Yep. Well, if he or one of his fellow clowns slams into my hull, it's not real likely I'll notice, or that they'll survive the experience. The funny bit is, he doesn't have a clue what sort of vessel I spend my working life on. Didn't last long, did he? One lousy x-post to asa and he's outa here. PDW Jeeze, Peter, the point is to keep him thrashing, not to chase him away! |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"Jeff" wrote in message . .. Peter Wiley wrote: ... Yep. Well, if he or one of his fellow clowns slams into my hull, it's not real likely I'll notice, or that they'll survive the experience. The funny bit is, he doesn't have a clue what sort of vessel I spend my working life on. Didn't last long, did he? One lousy x-post to asa and he's outa here. PDW Jeeze, Peter, the point is to keep him thrashing, not to chase him away! Wow, I missed a filleting and BBQing of a jet skier...too bad.... katy |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"katysails" wrote Wow, I missed a filleting and BBQing of a jet skier...too bad.... The guy was so lame that even Ganzy was pulverizing him. SV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
Sitting duckm tehn...no fair game...
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "katysails" wrote Wow, I missed a filleting and BBQing of a jet skier...too bad.... The guy was so lame that even Ganzy was pulverizing him. SV |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article ,
Scotty wrote: "katysails" wrote Wow, I missed a filleting and BBQing of a jet skier...too bad.... The guy was so lame that even Ganzy was pulverizing him. And, I was only using half my wits. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article , Jonathan Ganz
wrote: In article t, Bill McKee bmckee=at-ix.netcom.com wrote: Billy, why don't you just run along back to your fellow retards with PWC now, OK? It's obvious you're out of your depth here. PDW Well, since you have already proved you are unknowing in the rules of road, regards sailboats, I am going to ignore you from now on. And when you get in an accident with your ideas of right of way, and I see a report, I will just have them google up your idiocy. Ah, I get it Peter... he's just a troll. Not too bright either. Yep. Well, if he or one of his fellow clowns slams into my hull, it's not real likely I'll notice, or that they'll survive the experience. The funny bit is, he doesn't have a clue what sort of vessel I spend my working life on. Didn't last long, did he? One lousy x-post to asa and he's outa here. PDW |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article , Jeff
wrote: Peter Wiley wrote: ... Yep. Well, if he or one of his fellow clowns slams into my hull, it's not real likely I'll notice, or that they'll survive the experience. The funny bit is, he doesn't have a clue what sort of vessel I spend my working life on. Didn't last long, did he? One lousy x-post to asa and he's outa here. PDW Jeeze, Peter, the point is to keep him thrashing, not to chase him away! Sorry about that, I couldn't resist the temptation. He only *thought* he was getting a hard time in rec.boats.cruising..... Anyway, I think there wasn't much flapping left in him by now. Sorta like a mullet after it's been hit with the club. All flat forehead, bulging eyes and slime...... PDW |
Jet Ski overheating problem
In article , katysails
wrote: "Jeff" wrote in message . .. Peter Wiley wrote: ... Yep. Well, if he or one of his fellow clowns slams into my hull, it's not real likely I'll notice, or that they'll survive the experience. The funny bit is, he doesn't have a clue what sort of vessel I spend my working life on. Didn't last long, did he? One lousy x-post to asa and he's outa here. PDW Jeeze, Peter, the point is to keep him thrashing, not to chase him away! Wow, I missed a filleting and BBQing of a jet skier...too bad.... Well, we did establish why people own jet skis. They're too poor to own a real powerboat, and they're too unskilled to own a sailboat. PDW |
Jet Ski overheating problem
"otnmbrd" wrote in message
. net... "Jeff" wrote in message ... I often monitor channel 13 along with 16. I hear incoming ships requesting pilot service, and permission to enter and use the anchorage. And sometimes I hear tugs and ferries advising each other. However, I've never heard the tour boats or booze cruises reporting a position, not have I been able to find any traffic management authority for Boston that would track such movements, nor any requirement in the Coast Pilot. Boston doesn't have a VTS system like NY, SF or LA. Am I missing something? Don't know that Boston has the traffic to warrant a VTS, but it's possible. Check channels 12 and 14, as these are two that are frequently used for this service. Something which may have given you an earlier warning would be AIS, but quite possibly the various ferries do not have it. otn SF bay area is 13 v-to-v communication, 14 for monitoring. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
Jet Ski overheating problem
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 00:22:56 GMT, "Bill McKee"
wrote: "otnmbrd" wrote in message ink.net... "Bill McKee" wrote in message ink.net... Planet Earth. And I am not a sailboater, so know I do not have the "right of way" over large ships. Mebbe, mebbe not. otn Who has "right of way"? We call it the "law of Tonnage". If he has enough, he's got the right away. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com