On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:05:37 -0700, "Evan Gatehouse"
wrote:

Actually the two letters only mention seizure while in US waters. The US
would be violating a lot of international laws if it started unilaterlly
seizing boats in international waters.

======================

It's a long way from Canada to Cuba without going through US waters.

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 02:35:33 -0400, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 22:05:37 -0700, "Evan Gatehouse"
wrote:

Actually the two letters only mention seizure while in US waters. The US
would be violating a lot of international laws if it started unilaterlly
seizing boats in international waters.

======================

It's a long way from Canada to Cuba without going through US waters.

Yeah, but it's an even longer swim if the Coasties think your boat is
worth seizing because you smoked a cigar on the foredeck. Forget it. I
will not sail near America until regime change brings an end to the
terrorism.

Oopsie, did I say that? G

R.