Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:19:33 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . snip OIC... well, I guess a really small boat going fast or slow wouldn't be as safe as a bigger boat in bad weather? Depends on the seaworthiness of the boat. Any size boat can be seaworthy as long as it is built stoutly and has a crew that knows how to handle her in a blow. A ships life boat is a good example. The ship founders in a storm and the crew takes to the life boats which are very small in comparison and expects to survive the storm conditions in them. Sometimes small is better. Ok. That makes sense. I read somewhere about big ships breaking up because the weight of the boat is suspended between waves. snip I believe you. I just thought this was about sailing not using an engine. What about on a slightly longer trip.. wouldn't you want to use sail power as much as you can, so you don't run out? One would think so, but . . . Most of the people posting here NEVER sailed a boat that didn't have an engine. An engine on a sailboat is supposed to be an auxiliary which means a secondary means of power. Sadly, most of the Rubes here run their diesels even when the sails are up. And should the wind die and they can't do hull speed, they 'supplement' the sails with the diesel. It's shameful! Why don't people like that just admit to themselves that they are not interested in sailing and just sell the poor sailboat to somebody who would appreciate it for what it was designed to do and buy a motorboat such as a trawler? Wilbur Hubbard That's what my friend with the Catalina said... an auxiliary powered vessel... right when he started the engine! ![]() |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:19:33 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message . .. snip OIC... well, I guess a really small boat going fast or slow wouldn't be as safe as a bigger boat in bad weather? Depends on the seaworthiness of the boat. Any size boat can be seaworthy as long as it is built stoutly and has a crew that knows how to handle her in a blow. A ships life boat is a good example. The ship founders in a storm and the crew takes to the life boats which are very small in comparison and expects to survive the storm conditions in them. Sometimes small is better. Ok. That makes sense. I read somewhere about big ships breaking up because the weight of the boat is suspended between waves. It can happen! Seas that can destroy a ship often succour a disgarded light bult. snip I believe you. I just thought this was about sailing not using an engine. What about on a slightly longer trip.. wouldn't you want to use sail power as much as you can, so you don't run out? One would think so, but . . . Most of the people posting here NEVER sailed a boat that didn't have an engine. An engine on a sailboat is supposed to be an auxiliary which means a secondary means of power. Sadly, most of the Rubes here run their diesels even when the sails are up. And should the wind die and they can't do hull speed, they 'supplement' the sails with the diesel. It's shameful! Why don't people like that just admit to themselves that they are not interested in sailing and just sell the poor sailboat to somebody who would appreciate it for what it was designed to do and buy a motorboat such as a trawler? That's what my friend with the Catalina said... an auxiliary powered vessel... right when he started the engine! ![]() I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. Wilbur Hubbard |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:19:33 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message ... snip OIC... well, I guess a really small boat going fast or slow wouldn't be as safe as a bigger boat in bad weather? Depends on the seaworthiness of the boat. Any size boat can be seaworthy as long as it is built stoutly and has a crew that knows how to handle her in a blow. A ships life boat is a good example. The ship founders in a storm and the crew takes to the life boats which are very small in comparison and expects to survive the storm conditions in them. Sometimes small is better. Ok. That makes sense. I read somewhere about big ships breaking up because the weight of the boat is suspended between waves. It can happen! Seas that can destroy a ship often succour a disgarded light bult. Ok, I don't understand past "often". :} snip I believe you. I just thought this was about sailing not using an engine. What about on a slightly longer trip.. wouldn't you want to use sail power as much as you can, so you don't run out? One would think so, but . . . Most of the people posting here NEVER sailed a boat that didn't have an engine. An engine on a sailboat is supposed to be an auxiliary which means a secondary means of power. Sadly, most of the Rubes here run their diesels even when the sails are up. And should the wind die and they can't do hull speed, they 'supplement' the sails with the diesel. It's shameful! Why don't people like that just admit to themselves that they are not interested in sailing and just sell the poor sailboat to somebody who would appreciate it for what it was designed to do and buy a motorboat such as a trawler? That's what my friend with the Catalina said... an auxiliary powered vessel... right when he started the engine! ![]() I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. Wilbur Hubbard I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snippage I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... You could do it, Jessica, once you familiarized yourself with the characteristics and handling of your sailboat, the ground tackle, bottom conditions and wind/current. Like anything else it just takes some experience and some understanding of how things work. With your analytical mind, you'd be anchoring under sail with the best of them in no time. It's more about finesse than muscle. Even a big strong man simply cannot muscle a four-ton sailboat into place. On the contrary, one must know what the boat is going to do and let the boat do it in the direction and velocity one desires. A sailboat is like a woman. You gotta let her do what she wants but you have to know what she wants to do and then everything goes as expected. Wilbur Hubbard |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:23:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snippage I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... You could do it, Jessica, once you familiarized yourself with the characteristics and handling of your sailboat, the ground tackle, bottom conditions and wind/current. Like anything else it just takes some experience and some understanding of how things work. With your analytical mind, you'd be anchoring under sail with the best of them in no time. It's more about finesse than muscle. Even a big strong man simply cannot muscle a four-ton sailboat into place. On the contrary, one must know what the boat is going to do and let the boat do it in the direction and velocity one desires. A sailboat is like a woman. You gotta let her do what she wants but you have to know what she wants to do and then everything goes as expected. Wilbur Hubbard I hope we're going to get a lesson! I'm up for it if you have a pair of gloves I can use. I've gotta get to the gym. Then, I'll email you more, but let me know you got the last one!! |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:23:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message . .. On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snippage I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... You could do it, Jessica, once you familiarized yourself with the characteristics and handling of your sailboat, the ground tackle, bottom conditions and wind/current. Like anything else it just takes some experience and some understanding of how things work. With your analytical mind, you'd be anchoring under sail with the best of them in no time. It's more about finesse than muscle. Even a big strong man simply cannot muscle a four-ton sailboat into place. On the contrary, one must know what the boat is going to do and let the boat do it in the direction and velocity one desires. A sailboat is like a woman. You gotta let her do what she wants but you have to know what she wants to do and then everything goes as expected. I hope we're going to get a lesson! I'm up for it if you have a pair of gloves I can use. I do. They might be a little large but they'll work. You'll like my ground tackle. The anchors aren't too big and they aren't all rusty and the length of chain is nice polished stainless steel. I get those gloves with the little rubber dots on the palm side for better grip as the stainless steel tends to be slippery when wet. I'll be sure to have an extra pair or two at the ready for you ladies. I've gotta get to the gym. Then, I'll email you more, but let me know you got the last one!! Work on the abs and biceps. You probably already have the legs being a track star. An anchor full of mud weighs about a hundred pounds. LOL! Just kidding. Wilbur Hubbard |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:22:35 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 19:23:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message ... On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snippage I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... You could do it, Jessica, once you familiarized yourself with the characteristics and handling of your sailboat, the ground tackle, bottom conditions and wind/current. Like anything else it just takes some experience and some understanding of how things work. With your analytical mind, you'd be anchoring under sail with the best of them in no time. It's more about finesse than muscle. Even a big strong man simply cannot muscle a four-ton sailboat into place. On the contrary, one must know what the boat is going to do and let the boat do it in the direction and velocity one desires. A sailboat is like a woman. You gotta let her do what she wants but you have to know what she wants to do and then everything goes as expected. I hope we're going to get a lesson! I'm up for it if you have a pair of gloves I can use. I do. They might be a little large but they'll work. You'll like my ground tackle. The anchors aren't too big and they aren't all rusty and the length of chain is nice polished stainless steel. I get those gloves with the little rubber dots on the palm side for better grip as the stainless steel tends to be slippery when wet. I'll be sure to have an extra pair or two at the ready for you ladies. I've gotta get to the gym. Then, I'll email you more, but let me know you got the last one!! Work on the abs and biceps. You probably already have the legs being a track star. An anchor full of mud weighs about a hundred pounds. LOL! Just kidding. Wilbur Hubbard Definitely get some gloves! 100 lbs? No prob. |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:19:33 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message ... snip OIC... well, I guess a really small boat going fast or slow wouldn't be as safe as a bigger boat in bad weather? Depends on the seaworthiness of the boat. Any size boat can be seaworthy as long as it is built stoutly and has a crew that knows how to handle her in a blow. A ships life boat is a good example. The ship founders in a storm and the crew takes to the life boats which are very small in comparison and expects to survive the storm conditions in them. Sometimes small is better. Ok. That makes sense. I read somewhere about big ships breaking up because the weight of the boat is suspended between waves. It can happen! Seas that can destroy a ship often succour a disgarded light bult. snip I believe you. I just thought this was about sailing not using an engine. What about on a slightly longer trip.. wouldn't you want to use sail power as much as you can, so you don't run out? One would think so, but . . . Most of the people posting here NEVER sailed a boat that didn't have an engine. An engine on a sailboat is supposed to be an auxiliary which means a secondary means of power. Sadly, most of the Rubes here run their diesels even when the sails are up. And should the wind die and they can't do hull speed, they 'supplement' the sails with the diesel. It's shameful! Why don't people like that just admit to themselves that they are not interested in sailing and just sell the poor sailboat to somebody who would appreciate it for what it was designed to do and buy a motorboat such as a trawler? That's what my friend with the Catalina said... an auxiliary powered vessel... right when he started the engine! ![]() I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. Wilbur Hubbard Willie-boy, YOU are the one talking about possible needing their engine. Now you are back to barking at folks who have said exactly the same thing. Have you learned how to spell Phoney yet? Cheers, Bruce |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What battery for windlass? | Cruising | |||
Windlass wiring | Boat Building | |||
Windlass on an Alura 35 | General | |||
Windlass advice | General | |||
Anybody need a windlass? | Boat Building |