Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#141
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:50:05 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard"
wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:08:50 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message om You could just drop your sail and you'd still be going. That's cool. Just like Tom Sawyer going down the Mississippi . . . Yes... I wonder if that's all a couple of people here can manage? Like poor Bruce? LOL. He has to wait for the occasional Tsunami. Hey, I heard Thailand just had a 7.0 RS earthquake. I hope it didn't wreck Bruce's dock. Wilbur Hubbard Willie-boy, you are positively amazing. To be frank I have never witnessed anyone, on any news group, who so positively lusted to expose his ignorance to so many, so often. Apparently you have Thailand mixed up with Japan as Thailand hasn't had a 7.0 earthquake in years. Myanmar (used to be called Burma) just had one that's effect carried over to Chiang Rai. Rather like an earthquake in East Overshoe, Vermont, and you prattling about "Big earthquake in America". As George Eliot once said, "blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us evidence of the fact." Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) |
#142
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... snip Willy-boy I keep telling you that you flaunt your ignorance every time you open your mouth. Sadly you don't listen. A real sailor such as myself has learned to ignore the squeakings and droppings of a dock rat. Wilbur Hubbard |
#143
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:50:05 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message . .. On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 10:08:50 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Jessica B" wrote in message m You could just drop your sail and you'd still be going. That's cool. Just like Tom Sawyer going down the Mississippi . . . Yes... I wonder if that's all a couple of people here can manage? Like poor Bruce? LOL. He has to wait for the occasional Tsunami. Hey, I heard Thailand just had a 7.0 RS earthquake. I hope it didn't wreck Bruce's dock. Wilbur Hubbard Willie-boy, you are positively amazing. To be frank I have never witnessed anyone, on any news group, who so positively lusted to expose his ignorance to so many, so often. Apparently you have Thailand mixed up with Japan as Thailand hasn't had a 7.0 earthquake in years. Myanmar (used to be called Burma) just had one that's effect carried over to Chiang Rai. Rather like an earthquake in East Overshoe, Vermont, and you prattling about "Big earthquake in America". As George Eliot once said, "blessed is the man who, having nothing to say, abstains from giving us evidence of the fact." Wake up, Bruce! http://news.lalate.com/2011/03/24/my...ross-thailand/ Poor Bruce can't win for losing! Wilbur Hubbard - always knows of which he speaks. |
#144
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... snippage Thus speaks Capt. (outboard) Willie. Can anyone say Hypocrite? Or Phoney? I'm sure your wife, children and grandchildren all use the words frequently when they talk about you. LOL! Wilbur Hubbard |
#145
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:08:15 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snip Pssst! Bruce is clearly delusional. Either that, or he smokes a lot of those excellent Thai sticks. Waaaky tabaaacy LOL If I were Bruce, I'd probably do the same thing. Get stoned all the time to try to forget my failure to complete a circumnavigation and ending up stuck in a third-world backwater being a hen-pecked hubby. snicker Wilbur Hubbard |
#146
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:57:10 -0700, Jessica B wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:20:53 +0700, Bruce in Bangkok wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:47:56 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message m... On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:26:47 -0400, Ernie wrote: While you're on the subject of ecology Wilbur, would you mind telling us why you think dumping your pee and turds into coastal waters is OK. I believe he has a 2 cycle outboard also, talk about oil in the water. The Tohatsu 6HP is a four-stroke motor and meets Ultra Low emission standards. Not only that, but it is rarely used - unlike your diesel boat which uses the engine every time it gets underway. My sailing yacht moves about 98% of the time under sail. Your diesel boat moves 100% of the time under the pollution-making diesel. You should be ashamed of yourself. And, probably even when you're not underway, you're running a diesel powered generator. So, in effect, you pollute 24/7 when you're out cruising. So, stop trying to change the subject. Just admit your irresponsible and selfish attitude concerning your willingness to pollute the very air we breathe just because you honestly feel your recreation is more important than our health. Wilbur Hubbard Ah Willie-boy but you are rationalizing your need for a motor, aren't you. A famous (armchair) sailor like you admitting that he needs a motor. I'm ashamed of you. Better read another book to teach you how to sail without a motor and then you can be 100%. Cheers, Bruce (bruceinbangkokatgmaildotcom) I didn't see him rationalizing anything like that. He said he uses it rarely and appropriately. How is that a rationalization? At best it is rationalization. for one who frequently extols his great skill in pure sailing to be found out to have a (Ugh) motor and to admit that he uses it appropriately... How can one who is such a skilled sailor use a motor appropriately? Given that, they say, life is a learning process, perhaps you would like to take a look at the dictionary: Hypocrite: A person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives Or perhaps, to use the vernacular: Phoney: A person who professes beliefs and opinions that he or she does not hold in order to conceal his or her real feelings or motives If you knew how to use a dictionary, Bruce, you wouldn't have misspelled 'phony.' SMACKDOWN! Wilbur Hubbard |
#147
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:26:47 -0400, Ernie wrote: snip While you're on the subject of ecology Wilbur, would you mind telling us why you think dumping your pee and turds into coastal waters is OK. Of course it is O.K. after all, it is Willie-Boy Hubbard (the armchair sailor) who is doing it. (If it were you THEN it would be pollution) Since when has it become illegal to feed the fish, snails, crabs, etc.? Wilbur Hubbard |
#148
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:19:55 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: "Wayne.B" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 19:38:06 -0700, Mark Borgerson wrote: However, part of the problem in that conversion is that you can get a 36' sailboat in decent condition for about half the cost of a 36' trawler. Considering that the trawler probably has more than twice as much livable space and a lot more comfortable, not such a bad deal. :-) It's a bad deal for the environment as marine diesel engines are notorious for the huge amounts of air pollution they spew. And, they drip oil and fuel and foul the bilges which foul bilge water and fuel dregs are then pumped into the water. I never could understand how anybody in their right mind could be justified in thinking that their fun takes precedence over folks who wish to breathe clean air. It's such a me me me, selfish attitude. It reeks of elitism and hypocrisy. Really, it's no different than Al Gore flying all over the glove in his private jet then complaining about how much pollution and CO2 other people are responsible for. Yah, right! Wilbur Hubbard And so speaks Willie-Boy the armchair sailor - (wonder what he has been reading this week?) And, as usual, full of it, right up to his brown eyes. Firstly a marine diesel is not more likely to "spew huge amounts of air pollution" then any other engine. Probably even less harmful pollution then Willie-boy's frequently mentioned Van (where he hand washes his shorts). Wrong! Diesels are very high compression engines. This means they intake big doses of air and exhaust the same mixed with burned and partially burned diesel fumes along with huge amounts of CO2, some CO and plenty of NO. IOW POLLUTION in large volumes. It is an obvious lie when Willie-boy says that "I never could understand how anybody in their right mind could be justified in thinking that their fun takes precedence". His posts to this group alone demonstrate that he feels that HIS fun takes precedence. How is it my lifestyle is now defined as 'fun?' It just so happens that I take my sailing life seriously. Calling sailing 'fun' makes light of the fact that it is a serious pursuit which, when done right, can be said to be challenging and enjoyable but calling it 'fun' marginalizes the importance of taking it seriously. Wilbur Hubbard |
#149
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Bruce in Bangkok" wrote in message
... snip Oh Willie-boy, such an exciting description, but I thought this was a cruising group... Oh,I see. One who doesn't sail can't be a cruiser and is left little choice but to describe his shore side experiences. Like when you bore us with descriptions of your wife, children and grandchildren, Grandpa? ROFLOL! Wilbur Hubbard |
#150
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
how necessary is a windlass
"Jessica B" wrote in message
... On Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:25:41 -0400, "Wilbur Hubbard" wrote: snippage I've seen way more sailors who use their engine as a crutch in lieu of learning how to handle their boat under sail. I've even had some of the Rubes in this very group try to say it's irresponsible to anchor under sail if there are other boats anchored. They say such nonsense because they never learned how to anchor under sail and if they tried they would most likely ram somebody. If they weren't so inept or inexperienced they would discover that a sailboat has better steering functionality under a balanced sailplan than under engine power alone. I'd imagine that if the sailor is experienced in anchoring when sailing that it wouldn't matter if there were rocks or other boats around. I don't think I could do it, but .... You could do it, Jessica, once you familiarized yourself with the characteristics and handling of your sailboat, the ground tackle, bottom conditions and wind/current. Like anything else it just takes some experience and some understanding of how things work. With your analytical mind, you'd be anchoring under sail with the best of them in no time. It's more about finesse than muscle. Even a big strong man simply cannot muscle a four-ton sailboat into place. On the contrary, one must know what the boat is going to do and let the boat do it in the direction and velocity one desires. A sailboat is like a woman. You gotta let her do what she wants but you have to know what she wants to do and then everything goes as expected. Wilbur Hubbard |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What battery for windlass? | Cruising | |||
Windlass wiring | Boat Building | |||
Windlass on an Alura 35 | General | |||
Windlass advice | General | |||
Anybody need a windlass? | Boat Building |