Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Morel wrote: This high pressure traps the bacteria against the membrane, where I suppose it's like his little head is stuck in a hole his body can't fit through, a crude cartoon-of-the-mind's-eye. Never heard of that. Happens all the time. Biofilms are the bane of RO systems and need to be addressed through proper membrane care (cleaning, sanitizing, replacing, etc.). RO membranes provide a perfect substrate for bugs, and the constant flow provides a fresh source of nutrients. Take care of the system, however, and it need not be a problem. snip Now trapped in a high pressure environment, at some point, the bacteria explodes, releasing its internal load of really small toxins onto the surface of the membrane where it can, because of its tiny size crude molecules pass through the membrane with the H2O, contaminating the outlet water. The key, I'm told, is the high pressure, which rips many biologicals apart into tiny pieces. I don't see why this is not a possible scenario and a source of possible sickness for the drinkers. Doesn't happen. The bacteria normally is not "trapped". The little bugger is spun around and bounced around, then spit out of the reject line. That's *one* possibility of course, but with millions of opportunities, over time, many of the little buggers do get "caught". BTW, the poor little creature would implode, not explode. Well, considering its fluid filled, how would it implode? It will be lysed in either event. snip Again, all this is flushed out after a few minutes. It's simply a matter of rejecting the first few minutes of product water. Dumping the first few minutes of product is always a good idea. Keith Hughes |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:59:35 -0500, Rick Morel
wrote: Implode/explode. Okay, I'll go with both are impossible because it's fluid filled. This then negates any effect of high (or low) ambient pressure in either event, so that argument is thrown out. If you put them in pure water the salts inside the cell will suck in water. Osmosis. The cell membrane will become tighter, although I don't know about actually exploding. Depends on the cell, I think. Casady |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Rick Morel wrote: On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 08:22:29 -0700, wrote: snip snip BTW, the poor little creature would implode, not explode. Well, considering its fluid filled, how would it implode? It will be lysed in either event. Definition of lysed: The disintegration of a cell resulting from destruction of its membrane by a chemical substance, especially an antibody or enzyme This is *one* definition. There are a number of others, and it is commonly used for any action, mechanical/chemical/biochemical, that ruptures the cell wall/membrane releasing the cell contents. It's from the Greek "lysis" which just means a loosening, setting free, releasing, or dissolution. I honestly don't see how this would apply, unless it's a normal event of decomposition? Is that it? I plead ignorance and welcome any info. Yes, it is primarily through decomposition. As a biofilm forms on the membrane (a layer of growing critters), the base, or underlying organisms get farther and farther away from the source of nutrients (the water flow) and they die. They then decompose, but instead of getting flushed away by the water flow, their detritus gets trapped by the layer of living and dying bugs above them. More food for the growing bugs. Implode/explode. Okay, I'll go with both are impossible because it's fluid filled. This then negates any effect of high (or low) ambient pressure in either event, so that argument is thrown out. snip Again, all this is flushed out after a few minutes. It's simply a matter of rejecting the first few minutes of product water. Dumping the first few minutes of product is always a good idea. Actually I would say it's a necessary idea. Wait, that reads sarcastic. I don't mean it that way. I simply mean that I think it's a necessary part of using an RO system. Depends on whether or not you want your first drink of the day "fortified" or not ;-) Rather than play theory, here's the results of my real world experience cruising and supplying water from RO: Well, it's not theory. It's 25+ years experience with qualifying high purity water systems, all of which utilized RO as one part of the purification process. snip Don't get a too big watermaker. Size it to run at least a couple hours a day, and run it every day to top off the tank. Membrane fouling and all that bad stuff happen when they're idle. Happens whether they're idle or not, but your point is well taken. My experience is with units in the 2000-3000gph range, typically running 24/7 with treated city water as feed. Still require routine cleaning, and biocide treatment. Stagnant water is *always* a bad idea... It bears repeating. If you don't run it every day, or at least every two or three days, you will have problems. Do the biocide treatment (pickle it!) if you're not going to run it for more than a few days. Thousands (tens of thousands? hundreds of thousands?) of people drink RO water every day. On boats, ships, islands, Israel, and now California from processed sewerage water. I guess some get sick from it. It would be interesting to see what percentage compared to those that get sick from city water and bottled water. I doubt you'll find *one* case of sickness from drinking water made from a properly maintained RO system. But it does bear repeating that RO is a very good incubator for water bugs if not maintained and operated sensibly. Not that hard to do as you obviously have experienced. Keith Hughes |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gogarty wrote in news:20090421-210944.92.0
@Gogarty.news.bway.net: You make a very good point. Are there not emergency stills that work on sunlight? Yes. Only trouble is they are evaporators, not stills. Biology grows right up to around 180F so these solar evaps are easily contaminated, a source of nasty bacteria because they are just right inside in temperature. If you don't see it boil, it just isn't safe. -- ----- Larry You can tell there's very intelligent life in the Universe because none of them have ever tried to contact us..... |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry wrote:
Gogarty wrote in news:20090421-210944.92.0 @Gogarty.news.bway.net: You make a very good point. Are there not emergency stills that work on sunlight? Yes. Only trouble is they are evaporators, not stills. Biology grows right up to around 180F so these solar evaps are easily contaminated, a source of nasty bacteria because they are just right inside in temperature. If you don't see it boil, it just isn't safe. Well, for most common pathogens, you are pretty much correct. However, there are many spore forming thermophiles whose spores will just laugh at you if you try to kill them with boiling water. Throw in 10 spores of G. stearothermophilus in your boiling water. They'll still be happy to grow up after boiling for 10 hours. And you can throw in 10 B. subtilis/atrophaeus spores in your dry jar and put in the oven at 250°F. They'll still be viable 600 hours later. You'd need 10 minutes at 320°F. Dry heat sterilization is much less effective than moist heat, for most all types of bugs, so jack up the temp when you're trying to sterilize things in an oven. Keith Hughes |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Batteries? | Cruising | |||
The Similarities and the Difference Between a Batteries-Isolator and a Batteries-Combiner | General | |||
Golf cart batteries w/ 12 volt batteries - Problem? | Cruising | |||
batteries | Boat Building | |||
About those batteries? | Cruising |