Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
Mark Borgerson wrote in
g: You still haven't shown why you think the bacterial fragments are 'toxins'. Toxins are generally considered to be special-purpose chemicals released by an organism for a specific purpose. Toxin: "A poisonous substance, especially a protein, that is produced by living cells or organisms and is capable of causing disease when introduced into the body tissues but is often also capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies or antitoxins" This definition doesn't seem to include fragments of dead bacteria. First, this isn't court so I don't have to "show" you anything. People get sick drinking it, so it's a toxin. People get sick on cruise ships drinking it, too. -- ================================================== ========== Larry I've decided to worship Thor. My god has a hammer and isn't afraid to use it. Your god is a pacifist who got nailed to a tree. Any questions? |
#22
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 04:16:01 +0000, Larry wrote:
AS it was explained to me, these boat RO systems, to be small, use very high pressure on the membrane, as opposed to large commercial systems like a public utility would use in a purification plant at low pressure. Higher pressure is needed to desalinate sea water, much higher. It depends on the quantity of disolved salts, not membrane size. |
#23
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
Rick Morel wrote: This high pressure traps the bacteria against the membrane, where I suppose it's like his little head is stuck in a hole his body can't fit through, a crude cartoon-of-the-mind's-eye. Never heard of that. Happens all the time. Biofilms are the bane of RO systems and need to be addressed through proper membrane care (cleaning, sanitizing, replacing, etc.). RO membranes provide a perfect substrate for bugs, and the constant flow provides a fresh source of nutrients. Take care of the system, however, and it need not be a problem. snip Now trapped in a high pressure environment, at some point, the bacteria explodes, releasing its internal load of really small toxins onto the surface of the membrane where it can, because of its tiny size crude molecules pass through the membrane with the H2O, contaminating the outlet water. The key, I'm told, is the high pressure, which rips many biologicals apart into tiny pieces. I don't see why this is not a possible scenario and a source of possible sickness for the drinkers. Doesn't happen. The bacteria normally is not "trapped". The little bugger is spun around and bounced around, then spit out of the reject line. That's *one* possibility of course, but with millions of opportunities, over time, many of the little buggers do get "caught". BTW, the poor little creature would implode, not explode. Well, considering its fluid filled, how would it implode? It will be lysed in either event. snip Again, all this is flushed out after a few minutes. It's simply a matter of rejecting the first few minutes of product water. Dumping the first few minutes of product is always a good idea. Keith Hughes |
#24
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
Mark Borgerson wrote: snip You still haven't shown why you think the bacterial fragments are 'toxins'. Toxins are generally considered to be special-purpose chemicals released by an organism for a specific purpose. Toxin: "A poisonous substance, especially a protein, that is produced by living cells or organisms and is capable of causing disease when introduced into the body tissues but is often also capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies or antitoxins" You're talking about "exotoxins". Larry is talking about endotoxins (I'm assuming). This definition doesn't seem to include fragments of dead bacteria. Endotoxins are typically lipopolysaccharide components of the cell membranes of gram negative bacteria (like pseudomonads which like to live in water). When the cells are lysed, the endotoxins are released. However, and a big however it is, endotoxins are generally in the range of 10 kda to 100000 kda or more, and the RO membranes are more in the 1 kda range relative to retention. We're talking *drinking* water here. The FDA allows the manufacture of Water for Injection to be manufactured with dual pass RO (i.e. safe for injecting into your veins). Problems do arise, however, when the pressure is jacked up to deal with poorly maintained plugged membranes, and you get seam or joint cracks, o-ring leaks, etc. that allow water to bypass the membranes. Like any other critical system, RO needs to be maintained properly to work properly. Keith Hughes |
#25
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
|
#26
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
The heck with this battery water stuff. Go Lithium-ion! http://www.genasun.com/genasunbattery.shtml Only 5 grand a pop! Gordon |
#27
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
Mark Borgerson wrote: In article , says... Thanks for the explanations. It's been decades since my last biology course. I'm not familiar with the kda term, Its kilo-dalton. One dalton is the mass of one Hydrogen atom. When you start talking about very minute masses - as in tangential flow (TFF) and diafiltration systems (like RO as an example)- daltons are a common unit, especially in the biotech world where TFF is commonly used for protein purification/extraction for example. Keith Hughes |
#29
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
Mark Borgerson wrote: In article , says... Mark Borgerson wrote: In article , says... Thanks for the explanations. It's been decades since my last biology course. I'm not familiar with the kda term, Its kilo-dalton. One dalton is the mass of one Hydrogen atom. When you start talking about very minute masses - as in tangential flow (TFF) and diafiltration systems (like RO as an example)- daltons are a common unit, especially in the biotech world where TFF is commonly used for protein purification/extraction for example. Must be more of a biochemical thing. In chemical oceanography, we generally used either AMUs or micro-moles. 1 Dalton = 1 AMU. Since there are historically a couple different definitions for AMU (physical and chemical), a Unified Atomic Mass Unit was identified, and that equals 1 Dalton. Neither is an official SI unit, but both are recognized by SI. In biochemistry (esp. proteins) the dalton is the unit that's used, and since UF/DF is really geared to the biochem industry, that's what they use as well. What good are units if you can't use them to confuse everyone? :-) Keith Hughes |
#30
posted to rec.boats.cruising
|
|||
|
|||
Batteries, again, sorry
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
New Batteries? | Cruising | |||
The Similarities and the Difference Between a Batteries-Isolator and a Batteries-Combiner | General | |||
Golf cart batteries w/ 12 volt batteries - Problem? | Cruising | |||
batteries | Boat Building | |||
About those batteries? | Cruising |