Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers |
#2
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
|
#3
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? |
#5
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:58 -0500, Kali wrote:
In article , says... On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:35:04 -0500, Kali wrote: In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. What part of "healthy" don't you understand? Ok, let's take what he said literally. I'll read "healthy welfare mammies" as young, single, black mothers, living at or below the poverty level. Are white ones ok - the 18 year-old daughter of a laid off steel worker, for example? What about males? They aren't mammies, so are they ok for food stamps and medical assistance? What hand-outs designed to help these people get off the govt teet, like job training and Pell grants for college? Who will watch "welfare mammies" babies while they are at work, or school? Who gets help and who doesn't? You make a lot of presumptions regarding race, sex, etc. A thought cop or just being disingenuous, perhaps. You know about whom I am talking. And while we're on the subject of "welfare mammies" - who is opposed to funding for family planning, sex education, birth control, abortion, educational assistance, job finding assistance, and child care? The same people who bitch about "welfare mammies". -- Kali With the exception of educational assistance, I'm absolutely against of those left-wing abominations, Hillary. |
#6
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 10:35*am, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali actually,hmmmmm the first sting of action RE,of course would be my absence the thrill of having bitches fulfill their own worse nightmare would be an Master Piece* additional to fit for second n thirds mantra givens of course, there's will am all manner of dynamical debacles the hollow horror, gigantic, of forsaken an continuum withs an living oak grand master sounds cool,maybe i should bwahahahahaha tsk tsk hobbits. |
#7
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 1:35 pm, Kali wrote:
In article , says... Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. ____ Posted from alt.free.newsservers So, people who rely on welfare for 6 mos - 2 years for medicaid and food while waiting for SS to be approved are welfare mammies, then when their SS is approved, they are worthy of help. -- Kali Or, people who don't rely on welfare or medicaid, but whom Jack doesn't approve of receiving SSDI because his crystal ball says they're too healthy to get it. Also in Jack's world: Once on disability, always on disability. |
#8
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. |
#9
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia
wrote: On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I infer from the initial statement above. |
#10
posted to alt.usenet.kooks,rec.boats.cruising,alt.sailing.asa,alt.free.newsservers
|
|||
|
|||
Gregory Hall Socks up to praise himself.
On Feb 6, 3:34 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote:
On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:00:03 -0800 (PST), marcia wrote: On Feb 6, 12:52 pm, (Way Back Jack) wrote: Marcia wrote in reference to my antipathy toward most things liberal (paraphrased): Jack, that's a strange attitude for someone who worked at SSA. _______ Yeah, I have this belief that society has a duty to help those who cannot work because of a physical or mental impairment, as opposed to redistributing the wealth to healthy welfare mammies, mammy. Just another example of my contradictory nature. Doesn't apply to me, Jack. What *does* seem to apply to you is the mindset that an employee of SSA must necessarily buy into all facets of socialism. That's what I infer from the initial statement above. Curious why you chose to respond to my statement in *this* thread, where it's completely non-sequitur, rather in the *original* thread? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Praise for Australian PM | ASA | |||
In Praise of AIS | Cruising | |||
High praise indeed | General | |||
Suggestions On "Warmest" Type Of Socks To Buy For Person With Circ. Prob. ? | General |