On 06 Feb 2009 22:27:45 GMT, Robb wrote:

Gregory Hall wrote:

Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed the
starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you can
change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has happened
in the history of the world.


A Blunderbuss Award for our ignorant rednek hillbilly wingnuts.

You help Wayback teach his daughters about gonorrhea, won't you?

Maybe your groups should be more concerned about STD:

Syphilis rate up for 7th year in row
Wed Mar 12, 2008 5:33pm EDT Email | Print | Share| Reprints | Single

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. syphilis rate rose for the seventh
straight year in 2007, driven by a continued surge in cases among
homosexual and bisexual men, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention said on Wednesday.

Since 2000, when the national syphilis rate sank to a low of 2.1 per
100,000 people after a decade of progress in the 1990s, the rate has
soared by 76 percent, the CDC reported.

Homosexual and bisexual men accounted for 64 percent of syphilis cases
in 2007, up from about 5 percent in 1999.

CDC officials expressed concern not only because the recent increases
in this bacterial sexually transmitted disease follows years of
declines, but also because syphilis can elevate a person's risk of
being infected with the AIDS virus and the odds of giving it to
someone else.

They also called rises among women and blacks troubling.

The overall national rate of syphilis rose by 12 percent in 2007 from
2006, reaching 3.7 cases per 100,000 people, based on preliminary CDC
data released at a meeting in Chicago.

The rate for men was 6.4 per 100,000, a 14 percent rise from 2006.

The number of syphilis cases nationwide jumped to 11,181 in 2007 from
9,756 in 2006, with men accounting for six times as many cases as
women. Rates for men and women had been roughly equivalent a decade
ago.

Syphilis hit the black community very hard, with rates six times
higher for men and 13 times higher for women than among whites, the
CDC said. The rate for black men, 21.5 cases per 100,000, has risen 99
percent since 2003.

Syphilis rates have been surging in homosexual and bisexual men in the
past decade, particularly among those who are highly sexually active
with multiple sex partners.

RISKY BEHAVIOR

"Having multiple sex partners and other high-risk behaviors like not
using condoms do put you at higher risk for HIV and syphilis," CDC
epidemiologist Dr. Hillard Weinstock said in a telephone interview.

"Syphilis can increase the likelihood of HIV transmission two to
fivefold. And CDC recommends that sexually active men who have sex
with men get tested for syphilis, HIV and other STDs at least
annually," Weinstock added.

"It is imperative that we make STD screening and treatment a central
part of the medical care for gay and bisexual men," while also finding
ways to avoid these infections including HIV in the first place, said
Dr. Kevin Fenton, who heads the CDC's STD, AIDS, tuberculosis and
viral hepatitis prevention effort.

(snip)

http://www.reuters.com/article/domes...0954820080312?
feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews&rpc=22&sp=true

"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
...

How many days has the dweeb been in office, not counting Saturdays and
Sundays for Vanity Fair photo shoots?

India: "You're barking up the wrong tree."

EU: "We'll have a trade war."

Kirghizistan: "Yankee Go Home!"

Iran: "We have lift-off!"

His exsistence has been charmed. He's never really earned
anything politically: did nothing in the State Senate, had a cup of
coffee in the US Senate, and skated into the White House on the
shoulders of the media and white liberal "guilt."

But he's finding out that other Nations don't pamper him as we do, the
latest being socialist Canuckistan whom you would think would be his
bed partner.

It's going to be interesting watching this empty suit squirm.

Yo, Barry, It gets harder.


He's totally out of his league. When he speaks it's all a bunch of liberal
talking points. Individual statements don't make sense. From day to day said
statements are often contradictory. The man has no convictions other than
his liberal brainwashing. He's a walking, talking, teleprompter that loses
power from time to time which results in stuttering and incoherency.

He's going to be a worse failure than Jimmie Carter. The voters should be
ashamed of themselves. Dopes!

--
Gregory Hall

On 06 Feb 2009 23:15:41 GMT, Robb wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

On 06 Feb 2009 22:27:45 GMT, Robb wrote:

Gregory Hall wrote:

Starvation solves poverty. Allow it to happen. End of problem. Feed
the starving and increase the problem. You liberals seem to think you
can change the survival of the fittest law. Won't happen. Never has
happened in the history of the world.


A Blunderbuss Award for our ignorant rednek hillbilly wingnuts.

You help Wayback teach his daughters about gonorrhea, won't you?

Maybe your groups should be more concerned about STD

It's no concern to me - you brought it up "Cheri Poppin Daddie".

I did?????

Uh, no, I said that parents need to provide the education in that
regard.

Not hands-on education.

What is it with all you knuckle draggers that makes you want to "school
and teach your little kids all-about-sex".

Knuckle draggers? We don't play pro basketball.

Huh - nothin' as good as first dibs! Have you done your annual
1040abc_Express Exam yet?

You're confusing me with ya boy, Barney Frank.

Sorry, that's a cheap shot Wayback, I forgot you're old, therefore have
no tax liability.

Now you're confusing me with ya boy Tim Geithner.

LOL!



--
Robb | Shared Secrets Usenet

On 06 Feb 2009 23:15:41 GMT, Robb wrote:


What is it with all you knuckle draggers that makes you want to "school
and teach your little kids all-about-sex".

Your folks again:

Sex Trial Begins For U.S. Cult Leader

United Press International


Atlanta, Jan. 5--(UPI) The trial of a multi-faceted cult leader
charged with sexual abuse of children began Monday in Georgia, the
Atlanta Journal Constitution reported.

Nuwaubian cult leader Malachi York, born Dwight York, has alternately
claimed to be Egyptian royalty, a rabbi, a Muslim imam and a space
alien. He has pleaded guilty to child molestation charges twice.And
now, after a federal judge rejected one of those pleas as being too
lenient, the leader of the Middle Georgia-based United Nuwaubian
Nation of Moors, is facing 13 federal counts of racketeering and child
molestation and is accused of using his sect to satisfy his sexual
appetite for children and to hide monetary proceeds.

York, 58, now claims to be a Creek Indian named Chief Black
Thunderbird Eagle and argues the courts have no jurisdiction over him.

York was arrested in 2002 by nearly 300 federal and local law
enforcement agents who feared a violent repeat of the disastrous cult
raid in Waco, Texas. York was arrested after leaving the property, and
no incidents occurred.


http://www.beliefnet.com/story/138/story_13820_1.html




Six Million Kids Sexually Abused

http://allafrica.com/stories/200508151194.html

ABOUT six million children have in the last 11 years suffered various
forms of sexual abuse countrywide, the president of the Uganda Medical
Association has said.

Dr. Margaret Mungherera was on Friday speaking at a National
Psychosocial Support Consultative workshop at Hotel International in
Muyenga, Kampala.

Mungherera, also a founder member of Hope After Rape (HAR), a local
NGO, said a study began in 1994 by HAR found that a quarter of the
abused children and young adults were male. She said the study showed
that sexual intercourse occurred in only 7% of the cases, while the
remaining 93% were other forms of sexual abuse.

She said most of the sexual abuse cases were not reported to the
authorities because of the fear and trauma undergone by the victims.
She said there was gross under-reporting of other forms of sexual
abuse where sexual intercourse did not occur.

Mungherera said there was a tendency for most organisations
investigating cases of sexual abuse to concentrate on the abuse of
girls at the expense of the boys.
_________

Barry was so damn frustrated by the Repubs in the House not buying
into Porkulus. Why? He didn't need them for it to pass.

I'll tell ya why. The shrewd ******* is hedging. If it fails, he
can say that both sides were for it. If it fails without support from
the other side, his side can kiss the 2010 and 2012 elections goodbye.








On 06 Feb 2009 23:34:33 GMT, Robb wrote:

Gregory Hall wrote:

"Way Back Jack" wrote in message
...

How many days has the dweeb been in office, not counting Saturdays and
Sundays for Vanity Fair photo shoots?

India: "You're barking up the wrong tree."

EU: "We'll have a trade war."

Kirghizistan: "Yankee Go Home!"

Iran: "We have lift-off!"

His exsistence has been charmed. He's never really earned anything
politically: did nothing in the State Senate, had a cup of coffee in
the US Senate, and skated into the White House on the shoulders of the
media and white liberal "guilt."

But he's finding out that other Nations don't pamper him as we do, the
latest being socialist Canuckistan whom you would think would be his
bed partner.

It's going to be interesting watching this empty suit squirm.

Yo, Barry, It gets harder.


He's totally out of his league. When he speaks it's all a bunch of
liberal talking points. Individual statements don't make sense. From day
to day said statements are often contradictory. The man has no
convictions other than his liberal brainwashing. He's a walking,
talking, teleprompter that loses power from time to time which results
in stuttering and incoherency.

He's going to be a worse failure than Jimmie Carter. The voters should
be ashamed of themselves. Dopes!

U.S. Senate made a tenative agreement to one whopper of a 780 billion
dollar bailout for you guys, don't thank a liberal but you'll be spending
a tax credit this year. Maybe get some free goberment cheese - if your
luk holds.

Hold on We're not done YET!! Sending in overpaid teachers to lern' all
the little virgins how to not become "STD infected whores".

BOYS!!! Get "Factory in a Kit" - opportunity to invest in your own
business with goberment designed OSHA approved, UnionJack bicycles. Start
manufacturing and hire yo friends and mommas. Don't smoke pot,
put chicken inside pdf's now available on your local GOV_BroadBand
website!

"Build a bridge to somewhere and save a nation"



--
Robb | Shared Secrets Usenet

On 06 Feb 2009 23:52:40 GMT, Robb wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

On 06 Feb 2009 23:15:41 GMT, Robb wrote:


What is it with all you knuckle draggers that makes you want to "school
and teach your little kids all-about-sex".

Your folks again:

The Lunatic Fringe title belongs wholly to the person(s) acting it.
While I appreciate your caring sentiment towards Africa, I doubt you mean
it, and even if you do, there's really not much to do without funds.

And that's another thing, how much is Barry gonna dump into Mother
Africa?

BTW that's the second time (recently) you've copied that websites content
and posted it to the group, Wayback.

It's called education by rote.

On 06 Feb 2009 23:52:40 GMT, Robb wrote:


BTW that's the second time (recently) you've copied that websites content
and posted it to the group, Wayback.

Thought it was more like 4 times.

On 07 Feb 2009 00:25:00 GMT, Robb wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

On 06 Feb 2009 23:52:40 GMT, Robb wrote:


BTW that's the second time (recently) you've copied that websites
content and posted it to the group, Wayback.

Thought it was more like 4 times.

Oh I don't know, I just recall seeing it. When you find something that
you want to post E-mail the website to ask if you can post the article
to Usenet. They'll likely agree, if you mention including attribution and
a link. Fair Use (for "sections") works in the publics behalf anyway.

I just said that to tweak your nose.

Might've been 6 times.

On 07 Feb 2009 00:07:13 GMT, Robb wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

On 06 Feb 2009 23:52:40 GMT, Robb wrote:

Way Back Jack wrote:

On 06 Feb 2009 23:15:41 GMT, Robb wrote:


What is it with all you knuckle draggers that makes you want to
"school and teach your little kids all-about-sex".

Your folks again:

The Lunatic Fringe title belongs wholly to the person(s) acting it.
While I appreciate your caring sentiment towards Africa, I doubt you
mean it, and even if you do, there's really not much to do without
funds.

And that's another thing, how much is Barry gonna dump into Mother
Africa?

Probably enough to cause you a serious case of chokage.


BTW that's the second time (recently) you've copied that websites
content and posted it to the group, Wayback.

It's called education by rote.

Actually it's theft goberment-dweeb-employee, "wannabe teacher".

Here's some more theft:

A 40-Year Wish List
You won't believe what's in that stimulus bill.

"Never let a serious crisis go to waste. What I mean by that is it's
an opportunity to do things you couldn't do before."

So said White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel in November, and
Democrats in Congress are certainly taking his advice to heart. The
647-page, $825 billion House legislation is being sold as an economic
"stimulus," but now that Democrats have finally released the details
we understand Rahm's point much better. This is a political wonder
that manages to spend money on just about every pent-up Democratic
proposal of the last 40 years.


APWe've looked it over, and even we can't quite believe it. There's $1
billion for Amtrak, the federal railroad that
hasn't turned a profit in 40 years; $2 billion for child-care
subsidies; $50 million for that great engine of job creation, the
National Endowment for the Arts; $400 million for global-warming
research and another $2.4 billion for carbon-capture demonstration
projects. There's even $650 million on top of the billions already
doled out to pay for digital TV conversion coupons.

In selling the plan, President Obama has said this bill will make
"dramatic investments to revive our flagging economy." Well, you be
the judge. Some $30 billion, or less than 5% of the spending in the
bill, is for fixing bridges or other highway projects. There's another
$40 billion for broadband and electric grid development, airports and
clean water projects that are arguably worthwhile priorities.


Add the roughly $20 billion for business tax cuts, and by our estimate
only $90 billion out of $825 billion, or about 12 cents of every $1,
is for something that can plausibly be considered a growth stimulus.
And even many of these projects aren't likely to help the economy
immediately. As Peter Orszag, the President's new budget director,
told Congress a year ago, "even those [public works] that are 'on the
shelf' generally cannot be undertaken quickly enough to provide timely
stimulus to the economy."

Most of the rest of this project spending will go to such things as
renewable energy funding ($8 billion) or mass transit ($6 billion)
that have a low or negative return on investment. Most urban transit
systems are so badly managed that their fares cover less than half of
their costs. However, the people who operate these systems belong to
public-employee unions that are campaign contributors to . . . guess
which party?

Here's another lu-lu: Congress wants to spend $600 million more for
the federal government to buy new cars. Uncle Sam already spends $3
billion a year on its fleet of 600,000 vehicles. Congress also wants
to spend $7 billion for modernizing federal buildings and facilities.
The Smithsonian is targeted to receive $150 million; we love the
Smithsonian, too, but this is a job creator?

Another "stimulus" secret is that some $252 billion is for
income-transfer payments -- that is, not investments that arguably
help everyone, but cash or benefits to individuals for doing nothing
at all. There's $81 billion for Medicaid, $36 billion for expanded
unemployment benefits, $20 billion for food stamps, and $83 billion
for the earned income credit for people who don't pay income tax.
While some of that may be justified to help poorer Americans ride out
the recession, they aren't job creators.

iAs for the promise of accountability, some $54 billion will go to
federal programs that the Office of Management and Budget or the
Government Accountability Office have already criticized as
"ineffective" or unable to pass basic financial audits. These include
the Economic Development Administration, the Small Business
Administration, the 10 federal job training programs, and many more.

Oh, and don't forget education, which would get $66 billion more.
That's more than the entire Education Department spent a mere 10 years
ago and is on top of the doubling under President Bush. Some $6
billion of this will subsidize university building projects. If you
think the intention here is to help kids learn, the House declares on
page 257 that "No recipient . . . shall use such funds to provide
financial assistance to students to attend private elementary or
secondary schools." Horrors: Some money might go to nonunion teachers.

The larger fiscal issue here is whether this spending bonanza will
become part of the annual "budget baseline" that Congress uses as the
new floor when calculating how much to increase spending the following
year, and into the future. Democrats insist that it will not. But it's
hard -- no, impossible -- to believe that Congress will cut spending
next year on any of these programs from their new, higher levels. The
likelihood is that this allegedly emergency spending will become a
permanent addition to federal outlays -- increasing pressure for tax
increases in the bargain. Any Blue Dog Democrat who votes for this
ought to turn in his "deficit hawk" credentials.

This is supposed to be a new era of bipartisanship, but this bill was
written based on the wish list of every living -- or dead --
Democratic interest group. As Speaker Nancy Pelosi put it, "We won the
election. We wrote the bill." So they did. Republicans should let them
take all of the credit.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123310466514522309.html

In article , -
says...
Way Back Jack wrote:

The shrewd ******* is hedging. If it fails, he can say that both sides
were for it. If it fails without support from the other side, his side
can kiss the 2010 and 2012 elections goodbye.

I predict another Dem sweep in 2010, as more and more middle class
people wake up and see the GOP for what it is, not what it says it
is. Stonewalling and whining about tax cuts is about all they're
good for right now, with a few exceptions: vulnerable Rethugs up for
reelection in 2010.

Are you trying to master stating the obvious?

Tax cuts != stimulus spending. Yet that's all the Repubs can come up
with. The Bush tax cuts were an Epic Fail, and they keep banging
that same drum. And they are opposed to productive spending that
will get the biggest return in terms of change in one year real GDP.

Compare these from Moody's Economy.com:

Lump sum tax rebate: 1.02
Temp across the board tax cut: 1.03
Temp payroll tax holiday: 1.29

Perm/extend AMT patch: .48
Bush tax cuts permanent: .29
Cap gains/div tax permanent: .37
Perm cut corporate tax rate: .30

Extend unemployment benefits: 1.64
Temp increase in food stamps: 1.73
General aid to state govt: 1.36
Increased infrastructure spending: 1.59

http://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/do...the-impact-of-
the-fiscal-stimulus.pdf

Get the money out to the people who will spend it now. Corporate tax
cuts? Epic Fail in terms of stimulus.
--
Kali