![]() |
Thank You JEFF!!!
"DSK" wrote in message The bottom line- Bubbles claims he bought a boat, paying more than 5X what Scotty paid... and his boat is only slightly bigger, *maybe* slightly faster (if Bubbles takes sailing lessons)... will be used less, and that closer to it's home slip. WTF has he got to brag about? Not to worry--he'll concoct something. Max |
Thank You JEFF!!!
"Capt.Mooron" wrote in message "DSK" wrote in message The bottom line- Bubbles claims he bought a boat, paying more than 5X what Scotty paid... and his boat is only slightly bigger, *maybe* slightly faster (if Bubbles takes sailing lessons)... will be used less, and that closer to it's home slip. All Valid Facts...... WTF has he got to brag about? Nothing... he does it to generate sailing discussion. Look at the topic and subject matter on this group since he has returned! Politics... next to nothing.... yet he is single-handedly handling a myraid of attacks on his prepostorous claims. He has waaaay too much time on his hands. But dont' forget that Bubbles instigated many, if not all, of the past political discussions. He even requested I join in the assault to offer some sport. Now he's reconsidering the logic of that request! Mr. Crantz has been breakin' Bob's Balls with his race results! True again. But his posted results have been selective. A thorough search will probably disclose some significant 35s5 victories, too, and over supposedly faster boats. Bubbles does a commendable job of trolling. In that regard he is on par with Neal--the old version. And to his credit, he utilizes posting techniques in such a manner as to sound supremely arrogant and insolent. Unfortunate as it may be, threads just don't seem to propagate on polite humility. Max |
Thank You JEFF!!!
I'd take the Swan, but not the Wauquez or J. We could have had either,
but the designs were not comparable to the 35s5. In the case of the Wauquez we looked at one in CT in very good shape. Bunks were too short, head was tiny, no swim platform. A swim platform is a necessity for a sailboat to be worthwhile? A feature you want is "worthwhile" and being able to sleep comfortably on a 60-80K boat is not a "tall" order, but tough to find if you're tall. The J-Boat had sleeping room, but no swim platform and no aft cabin. Great boat for a couple, but less so for a family of 3 or 4. Or, if maintained properly, they might be just fine. Best non-skid available. 25-30 years is the typical lifespan for teak decks. Some go longer. Teak decks can also hide expensive problems. I love them...but don't want them on an older boat. I'd have to try a Swan to know if it's a good boat for me. I don't accept any boat by virtue of it's name. I looked at some pretty "good" boats that were huge let-downs because of poor designs. The Tartan 34 MK2 and Briistol 35.5 were near the top of my list....and they I got aboard them. We looked at the Beneteau 35s5 and I had little hope of liking it. Life can be funny. The 35s5 had the features we wanted and light air ability. We then looked into the specific quality points and history....we had found our boat. An added bonus...there are few around. We have plenty of Bristols and Tartans, even Swans and a single Nordic 30. But the 35s5 is rare enough here that I won't see it on the road too often so to speak. Of course the main thing were the test sails and the 35s5 was a blast, or as someone else wrote, "a screamer." Anyway...I think you understand my choices as the group also does in reality. But measured non-trolling posts like this one only drives them deeper into a frenzy. RB 35s5 NY |
Thank You JEFF!!!
"Maxprop" wrote in message Bubbles does a commendable job of trolling. In that regard he is on par with Neal--the old version. He's a one man squad tackling poster & puppet alike. And to his credit, he utilizes posting techniques in such a manner as to sound supremely arrogant and insolent. I've never comsidered arrogance as a character flaw and insolance predisposes that ranking is in question. :-) Unfortunate as it may be, threads just don't seem to propagate on polite humility. The best way to kill this group is a continuous stream of polite sailing discussions. I've considered this group one of the best comedy venues online. I was often rendered to tears of laughter when Ganz was losing it! One of my favourites is when some poor soul inadvertently wanders in and posts a diatribe prior to reading the group thoroughly. Nonetheless... when it comes to sailing knowledge.... this is one of the best spots for information... if you "pose your question in the form of an answer"! CM |
Thank You JEFF!!!
The best way to kill this group is a continuous stream of polite
sailing discussions. Mooron, were you here when I drove Dr. Armpit into threats that he'd drive here and kill me and most of the people on my block? He practically went off the deep end, then we never heard from him again. He'd been a regular for quite a while. We have some borderline cases here. Doug, Loco and Jeff take all of this a bit to seriously and I think I've shaved a few years off their frustrated little lives. Loco has mentioned again and again how "he'll never forget how I treated him when he first joined the group!" I actually think I drove Doug to buy a trawler as he feared buying a sailboat that I'd rip apart. Jeff is ready to use a chainsaw on his PeePeeQ and is upset that I told everyone who don't own a 35s5 to kill themselves. I really only meant Jeff. BTW, did you know that we sailed to Block Island last year and never went to Port Jeff? The pics I posted we clearly of Mystic and no one knew, not even the ones who claimed they've sailed here. Hmmmm. RB 35s5 NY |
Thank You JEFF!!!
The thing to remember is that without the "straight guys" most comedy
routines here would die at the first post. I was here when Dr. Armpit went over the edge... that was frickin' hilarious! One of my favourites was "Lil Stevie Sumner"... Oh and Ganzy after the Bush won the election! He was snappin' like a rapid poodle at everything! CM "Capt. Rob" wrote in message ups.com... The best way to kill this group is a continuous stream of polite sailing discussions. Mooron, were you here when I drove Dr. Armpit into threats that he'd drive here and kill me and most of the people on my block? He practically went off the deep end, then we never heard from him again. He'd been a regular for quite a while. We have some borderline cases here. Doug, Loco and Jeff take all of this a bit to seriously and I think I've shaved a few years off their frustrated little lives. Loco has mentioned again and again how "he'll never forget how I treated him when he first joined the group!" I actually think I drove Doug to buy a trawler as he feared buying a sailboat that I'd rip apart. Jeff is ready to use a chainsaw on his PeePeeQ and is upset that I told everyone who don't own a 35s5 to kill themselves. I really only meant Jeff. BTW, did you know that we sailed to Block Island last year and never went to Port Jeff? The pics I posted we clearly of Mystic and no one knew, not even the ones who claimed they've sailed here. Hmmmm. RB 35s5 NY |
Thank You JEFF!!!
One of my favourites was "Lil Stevie Sumner"... Oh and Ganzy after
the Bush won the election! He was snappin' like a rapid poodle at everything! Hey, I was pretty upset when Bush won too. Ironic thing is that now most people who voted for him feel the same way. Do you know that the previous owner of the 35s5 asked me (two minutes after meeting) if I was anti-Bush. When I said "Of course" he said he'd never sell his boat to a Bush supporter. Scary part...I think he was serious. RB 35s5 NY |
Thank You JEFF!!!
Maxprop wrote:
"DSK" wrote in message No. There is no such thing as zero heel--a boat will always heel when beating to windward unless it's a small dinghy with a 300lb. skipper and similarly-sized crew. Not true. Explanation of your response, please. The boat heels in response to 1- the amount of wind 2- the way the sails are trimmed If there's a LOT of wind, then yes the boat will heel... even with no sails up at all. In normal sailing winds, it is quite possible to trim for 5 degrees windward heel. This is not new, it was fairly common advice... yet very rarely followed... back in the 1960s. One thing that is new, and that I have not tried, is Oz1's advice that fancy plastic sails don't need to be heeled to take shape in very light air. Yep. The boat accelerates much better and if it's one of those gawd-awful days with chop & light air, it can go thru the lumpy parts better. I agree that it does, but what is your explanation for this effect? ??? Why do I have to explain it? It doesn't take a heavy crew, even. Not in light air. That's what I said originally. Nor in moderate air... if you're in control of the boat and not vice-versa. OTOH there are times when I like a lot of heel, like just before a tack ;) For roll-tacking? Bingo. DSK |
Thank You JEFF!!!
Capt.Mooron wrote:
The thing to remember is that without the "straight guys" most comedy routines here would die at the first post. Yeah, I was thinking just that yesterday. In fact, it was the straight men that made the big bucks, while the buffoons were considered replaceable. |
Thank You JEFF!!!
"Capt. Rob" wrote
..... Because of the failings of the Wauqiez and Jboat, they can't compete with the 35s5 from a design standpoint. ??? That's probably true if you're a moron. ... I'd take the Swan I suppose, but are you so certain that lofty build quality would still make a boat the right fit for everyone? It's not "just" build quality (whatever you take that to be). Swans are always among the prettiest, most comfortable, and fastest boats in production. Maxprop wrote: I don't know about everyone, but it would for me. How about one of the new NYYC 42s? Sweet boat, except for the name of course. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com