|
I think they have WMD stored in the Chook Coop.... I'm going to have to
invade! I'll let them have "elections" and then place my own Rooster in charge despite the vote results. Sure there will be bloodshed and lost chickens... but that's the cost of fresh eggs these days! CM "JG" wrote in message ... You need to stay away from the chickens. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91... "Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong? PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act . CM |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong? PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act . I think, in this case, it would be the Pet-riot Act. Mac |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal, properly cleaned and prepared, could feed 10 hungry African families for months. g I know for a fact they really like Missionaries.... they claim the meat is sweet and tender. Perhaps we should send them a supply of George Foreman grills, along with Donal. Max |
"Maxprop" wrote in message .net... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... I think they are plotting something. The goose just wants a pet and a handout of food.... the Rhodesian Ridge back thinks it owns me.... what am I doing wrong? PS... I think the canary and the parrot are backing the chook revolt... I'm thinking of invoking the patriot act . I think, in this case, it would be the Pet-riot Act. Heh.. excellent Idea... do you work for Haliburton by any chance? CM |
"Maxprop" wrote in message .net... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal, properly cleaned and prepared, could feed 10 hungry African families for months. g I know for a fact they really like Missionaries.... they claim the meat is sweet and tender. Perhaps we should send them a supply of George Foreman grills, along with Donal. If we send Donal... we should include some vinegar.. so they get the full Brit Flavour! CM |
"Donal" wrote in message It's probably a "pronounciation" problem. Have you tried giving them instructions when you're sober? Sober???... what a novel idea!! Oh wait..I enacted the Pet-riot Act and have already added overproof to their drinking water... crowd control.... I'm thinking maybe declaring a war on drugs.. but first I have to get them addicted to something... maybe lace the mash with cocaine? Yeah... then it would be like Bush and the Oil companies... if they want more mash... they'll have to produce more eggs! I can declare war on the terrorist raccoons.... they have Paws of Mass Destruction.... that should be sufficient reason to revoke the coop's open door policy and lock it down for good. Nobody gets in or out without permission! Oh Yeah... I'm lovin' this Bush Doctrine of the Chook Coop strategy.... CM |
They're making them that big nowadays?
"Maxprop" wrote in message .net... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal, properly cleaned and prepared, could feed 10 hungry African families for months. g I know for a fact they really like Missionaries.... they claim the meat is sweet and tender. Perhaps we should send them a supply of George Foreman grills, along with Donal. Max |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:w2KMd.3302$rB6.496@edtnps91... "Donal" wrote in message You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Donal... my chickens won't obey any commands I give them... It's probably a "pronounciation" problem. Have you tried giving them instructions when you're sober? Regards Donal -- |
Donal wrote:
"katysails" wrote in message ... In order for those children to receive the $15, the original donation would have to be more like %250 to cover the costs of management fees, etc.... I think that you have been subjected to propoganda. There are many disreputable charities who deliver very little of their income to the needy. However, most mainstream charities are quite efficient. The St. Vincent de Paul, for example, spends 90% of its income on the needy. http://www.cdi.gov.au/submissions/19...centDePaul.doc There is nothing wrong with taking care of one of God's creatures that you love, be it pet or another human being. Most people who are generous and kind to pets are also generous and kind in charitable giving. People who are mean to animals generally don't give a rat's ass about people at all... That sounds really nice. In fact I'd suggest that it is politically correct rubbish. You are mistaken when you say that people who spend money on their pets are "generous". Most pets are, in fact, a substitute for family/lovers/slaves. People who own pets are seeking affection or obedience, and are far more likely to be self centred than non-pet owners. Sell your freaking boat and feed the whole continent Regards Donal -- |
Donal wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message If he goes blind they can always have him put to sleep. Seems like I recall somebody here having a poor little kitten put to sleep because it went blind. Cataract surgery for cats and dogs costs roughly $150, takes 10 minutes, and generally only one clear eye is required for a pet to function normally. You could probably feed an African family for 6 months with $150. Who cares? Obviously not you, or you would sell your leaky sailboat and feed the entire African continent for a year. Anyone who'd put down a pet due to cataracts is slime. Anyone who would spend $150 dollars on a pet has definitely got their priorities wrong. That money could feed 5 hungry African children for months. Regards Donal -- |
"bell" wrote in message Who cares? Obviously not you, or you would sell your leaky sailboat and feed the entire African continent for a year. Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max |
And, the definition of a true conservative, is someone who wants to conserve
both the Earth and the people on it for the benefit of all. You're not a true conservative. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "bell" wrote in message Who cares? Obviously not you, or you would sell your leaky sailboat and feed the entire African continent for a year. Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max |
I don't think that's true at all Jon.....
Real Conservatives understand that if a country is so backward and stupid that they destroy their ecosystem and overpopulate... why should someone else be held liable for their idiocy? All the Liberals and Charities have done with their television ads..... is render me immune to any feelings whatsoever at the sight of starving children. The world is overpopulated..... let's let Mother Nature do her work...Okay!? CM "JG" wrote in message ... And, the definition of a true conservative, is someone who wants to conserve both the Earth and the people on it for the benefit of all. You're not a true conservative. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "bell" wrote in message Who cares? Obviously not you, or you would sell your leaky sailboat and feed the entire African continent for a year. Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max |
Don't confuse conservatives with the religious right.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:v2mQd.44008$K54.17125@edtnps84... I don't think that's true at all Jon..... Real Conservatives understand that if a country is so backward and stupid that they destroy their ecosystem and overpopulate... why should someone else be held liable for their idiocy? All the Liberals and Charities have done with their television ads..... is render me immune to any feelings whatsoever at the sight of starving children. The world is overpopulated..... let's let Mother Nature do her work...Okay!? CM "JG" wrote in message ... And, the definition of a true conservative, is someone who wants to conserve both the Earth and the people on it for the benefit of all. You're not a true conservative. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "bell" wrote in message Who cares? Obviously not you, or you would sell your leaky sailboat and feed the entire African continent for a year. Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max |
And don't confuse Gaynz with a straight man . . .
CN "JG" pandered thusly: Don't confuse conservatives with the religious right. -- "j" ganz @@ www.namblanow.com |
"JG" wrote in message And, the definition of a true conservative, is someone who wants to conserve both the Earth and the people on it for the benefit of all. You're not a true conservative. That's *conservationist* or *environmentalist* or *humanitarian*, Jonny. When you come up with the correct definition of *conservative* I'll let you know. Max |
Well, Maxipad, in your twisted view, I'm sure you're right.
"Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." Like destroying the Earth and the people on it is opposing change. Got it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "JG" wrote in message And, the definition of a true conservative, is someone who wants to conserve both the Earth and the people on it for the benefit of all. You're not a true conservative. That's *conservationist* or *environmentalist* or *humanitarian*, Jonny. When you come up with the correct definition of *conservative* I'll let you know. Max |
"Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Regards Donal -- |
"JG" wrote in message Well, Maxipad, in your twisted view, I'm sure you're right. But of course. You're just now facing that realization? "Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." In a classical sense, perhaps, but not in the more contemporary political reality. DSK calls us *neocons.* Like destroying the Earth and the people on it is opposing change. Got it. I suspect I'm a more ardent environmentalist than thou, Jon. Are you a member of Greenpeace? How about The Sierra Club? Do you donate funds to The Nature Conservancy? Have you ever done reforestation plantings? Have you given talks to school-age children about saving our virgin forests, our wildlife refuges? Have you spent personal funds fighting for cleaner air and water? Have you participated in the crude-spill cleanups and attempted to save affected birds and other wildlife? Have you stood in front of bulldozers and earthmovers to prevent them from ripping up pristine natural lands? Have you donated personal, professional services to peoples of Third World countries, at your own expense? I didn't think so. I've done all those things, and more. Max |
Thou are a TREE HUGGER... Maxprop!
"Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "JG" wrote in message Well, Maxipad, in your twisted view, I'm sure you're right. But of course. You're just now facing that realization? "Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." In a classical sense, perhaps, but not in the more contemporary political reality. DSK calls us *neocons.* Like destroying the Earth and the people on it is opposing change. Got it. I suspect I'm a more ardent environmentalist than thou, Jon. Are you a member of Greenpeace? How about The Sierra Club? Do you donate funds to The Nature Conservancy? Have you ever done reforestation plantings? Have you given talks to school-age children about saving our virgin forests, our wildlife refuges? Have you spent personal funds fighting for cleaner air and water? Have you participated in the crude-spill cleanups and attempted to save affected birds and other wildlife? Have you stood in front of bulldozers and earthmovers to prevent them from ripping up pristine natural lands? Have you donated personal, professional services to peoples of Third World countries, at your own expense? I didn't think so. I've done all those things, and more. Max |
"Donal" wrote in message Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Wooooo... you're gonna be ****ed at me then!! I can work anytime I want to but prefer to be a burden on society by drawing unemployment benefits until it suits me to return to work. Currently the government is paying me to do nothing .... which pleases me to no end!! CM |
Yeh, you're a neocon, but that's not a conservative. Wow, you're an expert
at everything. You remind me of horvath. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "JG" wrote in message Well, Maxipad, in your twisted view, I'm sure you're right. But of course. You're just now facing that realization? "Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." In a classical sense, perhaps, but not in the more contemporary political reality. DSK calls us *neocons.* Like destroying the Earth and the people on it is opposing change. Got it. I suspect I'm a more ardent environmentalist than thou, Jon. Are you a member of Greenpeace? How about The Sierra Club? Do you donate funds to The Nature Conservancy? Have you ever done reforestation plantings? Have you given talks to school-age children about saving our virgin forests, our wildlife refuges? Have you spent personal funds fighting for cleaner air and water? Have you participated in the crude-spill cleanups and attempted to save affected birds and other wildlife? Have you stood in front of bulldozers and earthmovers to prevent them from ripping up pristine natural lands? Have you donated personal, professional services to peoples of Third World countries, at your own expense? I didn't think so. I've done all those things, and more. Max |
"Donal" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. Uh huh. Sure. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Don't let your blood pressure get into the red zone, you mindless, clueless jerk. I'm self-employed. Yes, my staff and my practice did suffer financially by my absence, but you obviously have never had a genuine influenza, or you'd not be defecating from your pie-hole about things you so obviously know absolutely nothing about. Wanna talk about irresponsibility? How about those doctors that continue to see patients while shedding influenza virus? Epidemics have resulted from such negligence. Influenza is consistently among the top ten killers worldwide. The Hong Kong flu of the mid-70s killed more than half a million. The Port Chalmers flu killed about half that many. Type A influenza kills roughly 50,000 annually, and Type B somewhat less, primarily because it is rarer. You'd be well-advise to put a cork in it, lest you appear a bigger asshole than most of us already acknowledge you to be. Max |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "JG" wrote in message Well, Maxipad, in your twisted view, I'm sure you're right. But of course. You're just now facing that realization? "Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." In a classical sense, perhaps, but not in the more contemporary political reality. DSK calls us *neocons.* Like destroying the Earth and the people on it is opposing change. Got it. I suspect I'm a more ardent environmentalist than thou, Jon. Are you a member of Greenpeace? How about The Sierra Club? Do you donate funds to The Nature Conservancy? Have you ever done reforestation plantings? Have you given talks to school-age children about saving our virgin forests, our wildlife refuges? Have you spent personal funds fighting for cleaner air and water? Have you participated in the crude-spill cleanups and attempted to save affected birds and other wildlife? Have you stood in front of bulldozers and earthmovers to prevent them from ripping up pristine natural lands? Have you donated personal, professional services to peoples of Third World countries, at your own expense? I didn't think so. I've done all those things, and more. Thou are a TREE HUGGER... Maxprop! Guilty as charged. Max |
"JG" wrote in message Yeh, you're a neocon, but that's not a conservative. "A rose by any other name . . ." Simply that you and others choose to re-label us does not make it so, or valid. Wow, you're an expert at everything. Are you always so intimidated by those who've accomplished far more than you? You remind me of horvath. Another who's accomplished far more than thou. Really, Jon, you shouldn't allow an inferiority complex to be so all encompassing. Max |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message "Donal" wrote in message Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Wooooo... you're gonna be ****ed at me then!! I can work anytime I want to but prefer to be a burden on society by drawing unemployment benefits until it suits me to return to work. Currently the government is paying me to do nothing .... which pleases me to no end!! Donal, obviously, is unaware of the trend of most employers to lump sick days, bereavement time off, vacations, etc. all into a general category of *personal days.* The employee gets a given number of PDs, and if he exceeds them, he does so without pay, and if it becomes habitual it becomes grounds for dismissal. Guess Ireland lagging a bit in this regard. Max |
Dopey, you're a fool if you actually think that you're representative of the
neocons now in DC. They don't give a crap about the environment or social issues. They only care about big business and religious right. You haven't accomplished anything that I can tell. Why don't you make a comprehensive list and get back to us. (Hovath's major accomplishment is that he was hoodwinked into buying a piece of crap hunter.) -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message .net... "JG" wrote in message Yeh, you're a neocon, but that's not a conservative. "A rose by any other name . . ." Simply that you and others choose to re-label us does not make it so, or valid. Wow, you're an expert at everything. Are you always so intimidated by those who've accomplished far more than you? You remind me of horvath. Another who's accomplished far more than thou. Really, Jon, you shouldn't allow an inferiority complex to be so all encompassing. Max |
Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did
have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "Donal" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. Uh huh. Sure. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Don't let your blood pressure get into the red zone, you mindless, clueless jerk. I'm self-employed. Yes, my staff and my practice did suffer financially by my absence, but you obviously have never had a genuine influenza, or you'd not be defecating from your pie-hole about things you so obviously know absolutely nothing about. Wanna talk about irresponsibility? How about those doctors that continue to see patients while shedding influenza virus? Epidemics have resulted from such negligence. Influenza is consistently among the top ten killers worldwide. The Hong Kong flu of the mid-70s killed more than half a million. The Port Chalmers flu killed about half that many. Type A influenza kills roughly 50,000 annually, and Type B somewhat less, primarily because it is rarer. You'd be well-advise to put a cork in it, lest you appear a bigger asshole than most of us already acknowledge you to be. Max |
"JG" wrote in message Dopey, you're a fool if you actually think that you're representative of the neocons now in DC. They don't give a crap about the environment or social issues. They only care about big business and religious right. You're right. Only a fool believes that Washington truly represents his beliefs, or vice versa. The Executive and Legislative branches are the most powerful self-interest groups in existence. They primarily exist for themselves, not for us. If you believe otherwise, you've been duped. I really don't know what a neocon is in your vernacular, nor do I care. But I've recently (last ten years) become a fiscal conservative, which is not much in line with the Bush spending habits, but wishing for tax relief and a major reining-in of government give-away programs and spending in general. I'd like to see the size of government diminshed greatly from its present iteration. I've alwasy been a social moderate which is not much in line with the Bush administration either, except w/r/t the rights of the unborn and opposition to gun control. I didn't vote for Kerry, mostly because his voting showed him to be a potentially bigger spender than Bush, loving every federal give-away program that ever saw the light of day. Further, I knew there was no hope for tax relief under Kerry, and probably the opposite would have been the case if he'd had a democrat congress as well. As for social issues, Kerry probably was too far left of my views, but then W is too far right. I don't support the religious right (an extremist group) nor do I support any left-wing extremist groups, with the exception of the environmental ones. You haven't accomplished anything that I can tell. Why don't you make a comprehensive list and get back to us. Poor Jon. Hey there big guy, it's really not a crime to be an underachiever. Don't be so hard on yourself. (Hovath's major accomplishment is that he was hoodwinked into buying a piece of crap hunter.) Um, what is the size of that Hunter? What size is your boat? Max |
"JG" wrote in message Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. Whatsamatta U. is, and has been, Western Michigan University at Kalamazoo. And no, I never attended there. I attended the University of Wyoming, Ball State University (Bachelor of Science in Business) and Indiana University (Doctor of Optometry). What are your credentials, Jon? Max |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:07 -0800, "JG" wrote
this crap: Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. And you got what? a death certificate? Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message news:FcbRd.307$Fu.269@edtnps89... "Donal" wrote in message Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Wooooo... you're gonna be ****ed at me then!! I can work anytime I want to but prefer to be a burden on society by drawing unemployment benefits until it suits me to return to work. Currently the government is paying me to do nothing .... which pleases me to no end!! I couldn't care less about what happens in Canada. If your government is happy to pay you to sit on your arse, that is their problem. If you came to live in England, then I might get a bit upset!! Regards Donal -- |
"Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "Donal" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. Uh huh. Sure. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Don't let your blood pressure get into the red zone, you mindless, clueless jerk. I'm self-employed. Yes, my staff and my practice did suffer financially by my absence, How much did you lose? but you obviously have never had a genuine influenza, I've had influenza twice. Once when I was 15, and again three years ago. or you'd not be defecating from your pie-hole about things you so obviously know absolutely nothing about. Wanna talk about irresponsibility? How about those doctors that continue to see patients while shedding influenza virus? Epidemics have resulted from such negligence. Influenza is consistently among the top ten killers worldwide. The Hong Kong flu of the mid-70s killed more than half a million. The Port Chalmers flu killed about half that many. Type A influenza kills roughly 50,000 annually, and Type B somewhat less, primarily because it is rarer. I heard that doctors went on strike in the US a few years ago. During this strike, the death rate rose. Is this true? You'd be well-advise to put a cork in it, lest you appear a bigger asshole than most of us already acknowledge you to be. You over-estimate my reliance on your opinion. Regards Donal -- |
"Donal" wrote in message I couldn't care less about what happens in Canada. If your government is happy to pay you to sit on your arse, that is their problem. If you came to live in England, then I might get a bit upset!! Well...... I can't believe you would take such a haphazard attitude to the benefits of government subsidized vacation time Donal! I pay into the insurance plan.... so what is the ethical problem in taking advantage of a program I subsidize??? There is no employment in my line of work during the winter..... in my area. I am merely taking advantage of my climactic conditions and recouping a small portion of the ridiculous taxes I'm forced to endure. Do you find yourself burdened by your self imposed ethics? |
I don't remember any doctor strike in the US...there was a nursing strike in
Minnesota....very bad boo... "Donal" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote in message k.net... "Donal" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message Donal is a liberal, and one of the prime definitions of liberals is those who wish to institute great giveaway programs, but want someone else to pay for them. Max, I believe that everyone should pay their own way. Uh huh. Sure. I'm angered by the fact that I have to subsidise people who claim that they are unable to work. I get *very* angry when somebody gets *sick pay* when they take a couple of days off sick with *influenza*. Don't let your blood pressure get into the red zone, you mindless, clueless jerk. I'm self-employed. Yes, my staff and my practice did suffer financially by my absence, How much did you lose? but you obviously have never had a genuine influenza, I've had influenza twice. Once when I was 15, and again three years ago. or you'd not be defecating from your pie-hole about things you so obviously know absolutely nothing about. Wanna talk about irresponsibility? How about those doctors that continue to see patients while shedding influenza virus? Epidemics have resulted from such negligence. Influenza is consistently among the top ten killers worldwide. The Hong Kong flu of the mid-70s killed more than half a million. The Port Chalmers flu killed about half that many. Type A influenza kills roughly 50,000 annually, and Type B somewhat less, primarily because it is rarer. I heard that doctors went on strike in the US a few years ago. During this strike, the death rate rose. Is this true? You'd be well-advise to put a cork in it, lest you appear a bigger asshole than most of us already acknowledge you to be. You over-estimate my reliance on your opinion. Regards Donal -- |
What a dufus.. Well, you got what you voted for. I don't know how it would
be possible to do worse than Bush re spending. Kerry might not have been the absolute best person to lead the nation, but Bush has been the worst in recent memory, including Nixon, who at least had a reasonable idea of what foreign policy means. Don't worry about tax relief. You won't be getting anything from Bush. He's already talking about raising taxes to offset this nonsense about "saving" Social Security. You need to look up the definition of neocon. I'm sure you'll capable. Use Google. According to your own statements, you're no neocon. Talk about underachievement... you need remedial lessons in logical thinking. My boat is totally adequate for my needs at the moment, especially since I have free access to another dozen or so boats of various sizes. I hate to tell you Maxipad, but size doesn't matter. It's all about what you do with what you've got. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "JG" wrote in message Dopey, you're a fool if you actually think that you're representative of the neocons now in DC. They don't give a crap about the environment or social issues. They only care about big business and religious right. You're right. Only a fool believes that Washington truly represents his beliefs, or vice versa. The Executive and Legislative branches are the most powerful self-interest groups in existence. They primarily exist for themselves, not for us. If you believe otherwise, you've been duped. I really don't know what a neocon is in your vernacular, nor do I care. But I've recently (last ten years) become a fiscal conservative, which is not much in line with the Bush spending habits, but wishing for tax relief and a major reining-in of government give-away programs and spending in general. I'd like to see the size of government diminshed greatly from its present iteration. I've alwasy been a social moderate which is not much in line with the Bush administration either, except w/r/t the rights of the unborn and opposition to gun control. I didn't vote for Kerry, mostly because his voting showed him to be a potentially bigger spender than Bush, loving every federal give-away program that ever saw the light of day. Further, I knew there was no hope for tax relief under Kerry, and probably the opposite would have been the case if he'd had a democrat congress as well. As for social issues, Kerry probably was too far left of my views, but then W is too far right. I don't support the religious right (an extremist group) nor do I support any left-wing extremist groups, with the exception of the environmental ones. You haven't accomplished anything that I can tell. Why don't you make a comprehensive list and get back to us. Poor Jon. Hey there big guy, it's really not a crime to be an underachiever. Don't be so hard on yourself. (Hovath's major accomplishment is that he was hoodwinked into buying a piece of crap hunter.) Um, what is the size of that Hunter? What size is your boat? Max |
Whatever you say Rocky.
You "attended"?? Sort of like Cheney attending Yale I guess. You're an eye doc? I see. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "JG" wrote in message Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. Whatsamatta U. is, and has been, Western Michigan University at Kalamazoo. And no, I never attended there. I attended the University of Wyoming, Ball State University (Bachelor of Science in Business) and Indiana University (Doctor of Optometry). What are your credentials, Jon? Max |
Hate to tell you ... but we all get one eventually.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:07:07 -0800, "JG" wrote this crap: Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. And you got what? a death certificate? Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
"JG" wrote in message "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "JG" wrote in message Bwaahahahahaha.... Maxipad is about to pop a cork. He never actually did have the flu, but he's got his made up diploma from Whatsamatter U. Whatsamatta U. is, and has been, Western Michigan University at Kalamazoo. And no, I never attended there. I attended the University of Wyoming, Ball State University (Bachelor of Science in Business) and Indiana University (Doctor of Optometry). What are your credentials, Jon? Whatever you say Rocky. You "attended"?? Sort of like Cheney attending Yale I guess. Oh, sorry Jon, my oversight. I should have explained that a Bachelor of Science and a doctorate are degrees, implying graduation. I shouldn't have expected you to know that. I'm still awaiting your credentials, Jon. Max |
"Donal" wrote in message How much did you lose? None of your business, really. I've had influenza twice. Once when I was 15, and again three years ago. I've had it twice. This was nowhere near as painful as the Hong Kong flu I had years ago, during which I prayed for, but was not granted, a quick demise. g This one only made me wish I were unconscious or heavily drugged. I heard that doctors went on strike in the US a few years ago. During this strike, the death rate rose. Is this true? It's hogwash. First, physicians here are largely independent, albeit many more now are employed by HMOs, hospitals, and corporate clinics than before. Against whom would they strike?? Our doctors take the Hypocratic oath, and 99.9% of them take it very seriously. To boot, neither physicians nor hospitals are allowed by law to refuse care to those in acute need. I don't know where you got that bit of disinfo, but it's just that. You over-estimate my reliance on your opinion. You'd be well-advised to reconsider, in light of the fact that the opinion is not only mine. Max |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com