LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

I disagree. He has tons of crap.

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 08:59:59 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

Experience is speaking BB, you should listen.


Bobsprit has no REAL experience. He's a lifelong bystander.

BB

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
It is also EXACTLY what we wanted.

You wanted crap? Did you use this criteria when seeking your wife?

Bwahahahahaha!

RB





  #2   Report Post  
Thomas Stewart
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Nutsy,

You are like CAT **** BEHIND THE SOFA!!

It stinks----you stink up the discussion group
IT can't be ignored------You can't be ignored. You interject yourself
into the the nature of this group. You interfere
It is something Vile that needs to be tended to-----As do your crazy,
stupid statements without facts or reason
It isn't a pleasant task-----As is going thru all your many boring,
non-sensible post, created simply to aggravate
It can be cleaned up but the STINK REMAINS------ As does the presence of
your posts

You are, Cat ****. Pure and simple. You are the bad AROMA of this group
that we can get cleaned up

OT

  #3   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Couldn't muster a comeback, eh?

Still waiting to hear what boat you own...

RB
  #4   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Do yourself a favor and for ONE time in your life; Buy a Brand New Boat!

A friend of mine is a head lawyer for Time Warner/AOL. He makes enough money to
buy any sailboat, but he sails a Pearson 39. He says it's dumb to waste money
on a new boat. With most of my sailing local and short, why spend 100K or more
on a new boat?
I tend to agree with my friend. I sail my old boat for a small outlay of money.
The only "new" boat I'd consider would be a C&C 99 or 110, but I'd just as soon
find a used one where someone has already equipped the boat to some degree. It
not only makes sense, it also means you can spend more time sailing and less
time outfitting.
The C&C 34+ is hot on my list among a few others.

RB
  #5   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

It's a 1986 C&C 27-5. You've seen pictures of it.

You know what, Billy?
Our boat (or my WIFE's if THAT helps!) is faster, bigger, in better shape,
better equipped, better sailed, sailed more often, worth more and so on.
After 1985 C&C started making occasional lemons....ask anyone who knows C&C.
Awful interior on the 27 as well. Don't feel to bad. My first boat was a puny
27 as well.
I see the 27 is rated around 180, still slower than my old Pearson 30. There
are a few of the newer 27s around here. They have a nice hull shape, but that
window is horrible! The overall effect is that it looks 24 or 25 feet LOA.
Wanna race, dopey??!!! I'll just use the genoa alone!

And...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

RB


  #6   Report Post  
Capt. Mooron
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

For Gawd's sake Bob... don't race a C&C 27..... it's one of the fastest
boats I've raced against.

CM



"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
| It's a 1986 C&C 27-5. You've seen pictures of it.
|
| You know what, Billy?
| Our boat (or my WIFE's if THAT helps!) is faster, bigger, in better shape,
| better equipped, better sailed, sailed more often, worth more and so on.
| After 1985 C&C started making occasional lemons....ask anyone who knows
C&C.
| Awful interior on the 27 as well. Don't feel to bad. My first boat was a
puny
| 27 as well.
| I see the 27 is rated around 180, still slower than my old Pearson 30.
There
| are a few of the newer 27s around here. They have a nice hull shape, but
that
| window is horrible! The overall effect is that it looks 24 or 25 feet LOA.
| Wanna race, dopey??!!! I'll just use the genoa alone!
|
| And...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!
|
| RB


  #7   Report Post  
Jonathan Ganz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Your wife's what is bigger and faster?

"Bobsprit" wrote in message
...
It's a 1986 C&C 27-5. You've seen pictures of it.

You know what, Billy?
Our boat (or my WIFE's if THAT helps!) is faster, bigger, in better shape,
better equipped, better sailed, sailed more often, worth more and so on.
After 1985 C&C started making occasional lemons....ask anyone who knows

C&C.
Awful interior on the 27 as well. Don't feel to bad. My first boat was a

puny
27 as well.
I see the 27 is rated around 180, still slower than my old Pearson 30.

There
are a few of the newer 27s around here. They have a nice hull shape, but

that
window is horrible! The overall effect is that it looks 24 or 25 feet LOA.
Wanna race, dopey??!!! I'll just use the genoa alone!

And...BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA!

RB



  #8   Report Post  
The_navigator©
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Yes, we've seen the pictures.

Cheers MC

Bobsprit wrote:

Our boat (or my WIFE's if THAT helps!) is faster, bigger,


  #9   Report Post  
SkitchNYC
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

A friend of mine is a head lawyer for Time Warner/AOL. He makes enough money
to
buy any sailboat, but he sails a Pearson 39.


Who is he? I know every lawyer at AOLTW and there are only several who could
afford to buy any sailboat.

And why would you take financial advice from a lawyer? Is he the one who told
you about the "tax profile"?
  #10   Report Post  
Bobsprit
 
Posts: n/a
Default Still no one!

Who is he? I know every lawyer at AOLTW and there are only several who could
afford to buy any sailboat.

If you knew them all, then you'd know this guy. He's a real sailor. He owned
the 39 and a Cal 29 before that.
He has TW execs out all of the time.
You know no one, bub. And you just proved it.

RB


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017