Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... David Kemper wrote: A Canadian canoe is much slower especially paddled solo. Yes, but this is only a problem if you're in a degree of hurry inappropriate to an open boat! OP might be, but might not... Well yes but then you have to consider that the effort required to move a craft with greater drag and more windage is going to limit the distance the OP can go for a given amount of energy. That is to say before he gets too tired. Canadians are ideal for a pair of paddlers who want to cart a lot of cargo but aren't in any hurry. It's a lot easier to paddle a Canadian 2 up from a technical skill point of view, as well as just the extra motive power side. Solo open boat needs a bit of practice with a good J stroke, and you can't just get in and go to the same extent you can with 2 paddlers or a kayak. But with a bit of practice solo open canoe does go places. Personally I find the requirement of a bit more skill to work it is a nice thing (as long as I don't get past what my own skills can deal with, of course!), but I can see how people would just view it as making life difficult. I like paddling Canadians solo and 2 up but it is more effort. I passed my placid water level 2 coach in both canoes and kayaks, so have the basic skills up to 3 star in both types of craft. I find my knees get sore paddling Canadian canoes. In flat water you can just sit on the seats. Where I come down off the seats for rough stuff I actually find it's my ankles that suffer rather than my knees, but the boats I use have been lined with Karrimat by their owner. Overall, especially on flat water, I find the possibility of more than one seating position makes the open boat more comfortable than a kayak over a good stretch of time. My ankles also suffer. I prefer kneeling to sitting as I find I can control the canoe better and move faster. Speed is always the goal when you belong to the racing community. Even when there is no real need! Your experience with glass fibre boats must be radically different from mine then. You do find ancient wrecked GF boats but ancient plastic boats are often also rather beaten up And I've seen GRP hulks that were basically porus /completely/ restored to seagoing quality with a suitable dose of TLC. TSKC has an anasacuta which was basically a write-off hulk but was rescued, made waterproof again, had a skeg added and a rear oval hatch in place of the old round one. None of that would have been easily possible with an old plastic wreck. Totally agree here. GRP (I normally say glass fibre but really mean composite which can include kevlar and carbon as well) is normally a lot lighter than plastic too. This bit makes sense assuming a base paddling speed as low as 4KPH. Faster speeds are normal in GF touring and racing kayaks. I'm considered slow and manage an average of 4-5 MPH and can paddle quite a bit faster for short distances such as when overtaking canal boats. Sprinting past to get through a bridge before the canal boat gets there and blocks the hole is a fairly frequent occurance as is encountering another canal boat coming in the opposite direction. I try to avoid becoming the filling in a boat sandwich. I can't paddle for 6 hours though. I'm sure I could build up to it but haven't any desire to. I'm going slower, but /can/ paddle for 6 hours: sea touring this may well be necessary. But from a touring perspective I'd say the where and the whereabouts are probably more important to the paddler than the how far and how fast, which are clearly uppermost in a marathon paddler's mind for good reason. I'd sooner dander down the river in a canoe, but clearly tastes vary. It is a very good thing tastes do vary, or we would find the bits of water we use getting very crowded. I've tried various canoeing disiplines but find marathon suits me best. I still dabble in other boats including canoes. I sail and I drive power boats sometimes. I paddle in the swimming pool too. When I want a change. David Kemper Not a fan of overcrowding. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Kemper wrote:
Well yes but then you have to consider that the effort required to move a craft with greater drag and more windage is going to limit the distance the OP can go for a given amount of energy. That is to say before he gets too tired. Indeed, though as with speed, if that distance is /enough/ then it's a moot point. If he only wants to go X miles, and can, then that's okay, and it's also okay if he doesn't really care how many miles as long as he has a nice time and has somewhere to stop.. My ankles also suffer. I prefer kneeling to sitting as I find I can control the canoe better and move faster. Speed is always the goal when you belong to the racing community. Even when there is no real need! Looking at the scenery and wildlife is more the goal for the touring community! If the OP does want to cover a good chunk of water the kayak would be better, but if his tastes are more like mine then lots of luxury camp kit in a Canadian would be more the thing... Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... David Kemper wrote: Well yes but then you have to consider that the effort required to move a craft with greater drag and more windage is going to limit the distance the OP can go for a given amount of energy. That is to say before he gets too tired. Indeed, though as with speed, if that distance is /enough/ then it's a moot point. If he only wants to go X miles, and can, then that's okay, and it's also okay if he doesn't really care how many miles as long as he has a nice time and has somewhere to stop.. My ankles also suffer. I prefer kneeling to sitting as I find I can control the canoe better and move faster. Speed is always the goal when you belong to the racing community. Even when there is no real need! Looking at the scenery and wildlife is more the goal for the touring community! If the OP does want to cover a good chunk of water the kayak would be better, but if his tastes are more like mine then lots of luxury camp kit in a Canadian would be more the thing... Yes, I concede that you are absolutely correct in terms of gentle touring/ pottering about. I was under the impression the OP was looking to do DW next year though. (maybe that should be he is considering it a possibility) This implies he wants to be able to cover a larger distance and indeed will be disqualified on safety grounds should he fail to complete any stage within the permitted time slot. DW in a solo Canadian would be a nightmare trip. I'm sure someone will have done it though. David Kemper Not a fan of bad dreams. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Kemper" wrote in message ... Yes, I concede that you are absolutely correct in terms of gentle touring/ pottering about. I was under the impression the OP was looking to do DW next year though. (maybe that should be he is considering it a possibility) This implies he wants to be able to cover a larger distance and indeed will be disqualified on safety grounds should he fail to complete any stage within the permitted time slot. DW in a solo Canadian would be a nightmare trip. I'm sure someone will have done it though. Yes, I'm a competetive sort of chap so always try and push myself when partaking in any sport. I find it tough to cycle slowly and always end up leaving friends behind. Woops. I'd presume that I'd be looking for distance rather than pottering when I take up kayaking. I'm wondering whether I could beat the 15hour record of the DW ... just kidding ... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Kemper wrote:
Yes, I concede that you are absolutely correct in terms of gentle touring/ pottering about. I was thinking in the context of "I've got a little idea brewing where I take a canoe/kayak up the Thames and camp out etc etc." from the very first post. I was under the impression the OP was looking to do DW next year though In which case, yes, a kayak (and a quick one at that) would be much better. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Clinch" wrote in message ... David Kemper wrote: Yes, I concede that you are absolutely correct in terms of gentle touring/ pottering about. I was thinking in the context of "I've got a little idea brewing where I take a canoe/kayak up the Thames and camp out etc etc." from the very first post. I was under the impression the OP was looking to do DW next year though In which case, yes, a kayak (and a quick one at that) would be much better. I think I'd like a bit of both from a single vessel. I'd like to potter up to a pub on the river, but also (mainly) use it to build strength and technique. Cheers |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
elyob wrote:
I think I'd like a bit of both from a single vessel. I'd like to potter up to a pub on the river, but also (mainly) use it to build strength and technique. Note that you can have plenty of strength and technique in an open canoe and /still/ be a lot slower than a kayak. So if strength and technique is all you're after on your Go For It competitive side, not necessarily related to absolute speed and range, then a canoe can still do the job. In fact you'll need to use /more/ technique to get a canoe moving well. On the pottering front it's easier to get in and out of and is much more flexible as regards loading. About 16' can go either 1 or 2 up, so the loading flexibility extends to company. More of a pain to portage, but easier to put a portage trolley in with the gear... But to eat up the miles and still carry a reasonable bit of kit a touring kayak will be quicker, and easier to get fluent at paddling. A tourer won't be as quickly as a marathon boat like DK's suggesting, but is (I'd think) a lot easier to do a week's worth of camping from! As with bikes, you are stuck with the fact that One Size Does Not Fit All Purposes. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | Touring | |||
Dictionary of Paddling Terms :-) | General | |||
Tortoise Reserve Work Party & Paddling Weekend | General | |||
Tortoise Reserve Work Party & Paddling Weekend | Touring | |||
Newbie paddling questions - inflatables | General |