On Feb 5, 9:15�pm, "Lu Powell" wrote:
"HK" wrote in message

...





Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of
charisma, he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role
model for young blacks, especially taking into account his modest
beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Sour grapes. If the D's waltz into office this year it's because the
public is already "fed up" with a few other things. But it ain't over
yet. Watch for third party (ies) spoiler candidates to distort the
equation. There is a history in this country of big donors shelling
out to 3rd party players that they think will draw support *away* from
the opposition. No reason to expect this year will be any different.

Anybody running for either party, and especially the few left
realistically standing, will be a *huge* improvement over what we have
had to put up with for the last hate years. Er, I meant to type eight
years. Don't know what got into me, really. :-)

"Lu Powell" wrote in message
. ..

"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.


Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see it
breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black voters
for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma, he's
really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for young
blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn" medical
care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress back in
2010, the White House in 2012.



Spoken like a true observer.

Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of
charisma, he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role
model for young blacks, especially taking into account his modest
beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and
waiting in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say to
them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}
What would you do if you were president? Macho man. Talk about the balls of
a brass monkey; you got em Harry. Geeeze. Have you forgotten your military
days? Or lack thereof.

Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:18:38 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:24:35 -0500, HK wrote:

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.



Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and
waiting in line for health care.
By 2012 it will become clear that Social Security will become a drain
on the treasury instead of the cash cow it has been since 1939 when
FDR allowed the government to spend the surplus. Medicare will already
be a major expense, far exceeding what the medicare taxes take in. The
stock matket will be in trouble as boomers liquidate their 401ks and
IRAs. At that time I imagine people will start thinking Ron Paul was
right. We can't depend on the government to give us "free" stuff with
borrowed money and we can't afford to have 700 military bases
scattered around the globe.

Well, I can sum it all up with this song...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z47EU...eature=related


A song about what the GOP fanatics will be doing this fall:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDQHjYIojTs

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:18:38 -0500, wrote:

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:24:35 -0500, HK wrote:

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and
waiting in line for health care.

By 2012 it will become clear that Social Security will become a drain
on the treasury instead of the cash cow it has been since 1939 when
FDR allowed the government to spend the surplus. Medicare will already
be a major expense, far exceeding what the medicare taxes take in. The
stock matket will be in trouble as boomers liquidate their 401ks and
IRAs. At that time I imagine people will start thinking Ron Paul was
right. We can't depend on the government to give us "free" stuff with
borrowed money and we can't afford to have 700 military bases
scattered around the globe.

Well, I can sum it all up with this song...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z47EU...eature=related

There is a secret message hidden there. Play the song at half speed
backwards.

"HK" wrote in message
...


I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.


Harry said he's happy.

:-)


Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.


Harry said he's happy.

:-)


Eisboch



Do you know how you can tell if Harry is not telling the truth?


His fingers are on the keyboard.

Harry will never be happy.

HK wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.

Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.


Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area.

Harry,
Your racism is showing.

But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks,

I would think most people would think he is a positive role model for
everyone. He is a fantastic orator and a true leader, even if one
disagrees with his politics he is reinvigerating voters tired of the
same BS.

Too bad, you and Billary think it is a black thing.


especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.