"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say to
them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say
to them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).


Accurately stated after 9/11.

Eisboch

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.
Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.
And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.



Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say to
them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).



Interesting. I don't think Bush has balls or brains. What he does have
is chutzpah.

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.


You know what? None of this primary/caucus nonsense makes any sense anyway
until both parties do away with the "super delegates". Ironically, the
Democratic party is the worst offender of the concept of ordinary "people"
choosing their candidate. Might make you feel like you are participating,
but those in power hold the cards.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
...

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.


You know what? None of this primary/caucus nonsense makes any sense anyway
until both parties do away with the "super delegates". Ironically, the
Democratic party is the worst offender of the concept of ordinary "people"
choosing their candidate. Might make you feel like you are participating,
but those in power hold the cards.

Eisboch




Awwww. Some of us like brokered conventions.

What I would like the party to do away with is caucuses. The act of
voting should be private matter, not an exercise in "English" debate
techniques.

Next, trash the electoral college!

"Eisboch" wrote in message
...

"JoeSpareBedroom" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...


I think Bush has more balls than brains. And, if he doesn't meet with
adversaries, it's because his sitters are terrified of what he might say
to them. Remember, he's a "war president" (his words).


Accurately stated after 9/11.

Eisboch


Sometimes, true doesn't balance stupid, and it was stupid of him to say
that.

One of the problems in CA is the STRONG absentee ballet,

Thats because they're still harvesting the Lettuce.

some strong swings in the last 30 days.

Mood swings again..?

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 00:38:37 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"HK" wrote in message
...


Delightfully, it doesn't matter to me whether Hillary or Barack wins,
since I will be happy with either in the White House.


It would be very interesting and refreshing to see you "happy".
Somehow I doubt it will ever happen though, regardless of the election
outcome.

Eisboch


It will be fun to watch Harry bitch when the Democrats are in charge and
the USA is going to hell in a hand basket.
--
John H

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with Hillary
there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}
What would you do if you were president? Macho man. Talk about the balls of
a brass monkey; you got em Harry. Geeeze. Have you forgotten your military
days? Or lack thereof.

"Jim" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


What would you do if you were president? Macho man. Talk about the balls
of a brass monkey; you got em Harry. Geeeze. Have you forgotten your
military days? Or lack thereof.

How about invading the correct country, if retaliation for 9/11 was really
one of the goals (which it should've been)?