"Jim" wrote in message
...

"HK" wrote in message
...
Lu Powell wrote:
"HK" wrote in message
...
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:14:37 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

So far, the early exiting polls are showing Obama really laying the
timber to Clinton.

Maginally, but getting wins straight up.

Very interesting.
Now pretty even up - Obama got five states, Clinton has five states.

Curiously, it seems to be breaking along race lines.

This is going to be very interesting.

Yeah, the "breaking along racial lines" bit worries me. I'd rather see
it breaking much, much closer in that area. But I can't fault black
voters for going en masse for Barack Obama. He's got a lot of charisma,
he's really smart and accomplished, and he's a positive role model for
young blacks, especially taking into account his modest beginnings.

I'll be delighted to see him in the Oval Office, as I would with
Hillary there.

I'm very happy to see Romney tanking.

And when the voters get fed up with higher taxes, "wait-your-turn"
medical care and cowardice abroad, the Republicans will take Congress
back in 2010, the White House in 2012.




Not to worry, Lu...the way we are arranging it, only you and your
conservacrap buddies will find themselves paying higher taxes and waiting
in line for health care. Turnabout is fair play, after all!

As for cowardice abroad, that's an attribute of George W. Bush. He's
scared of meeting with his adversaries and sends in the troops, instead.

:}


What would you do if you were president? Macho man. Talk about the balls
of a brass monkey; you got em Harry. Geeeze. Have you forgotten your
military days? Or lack thereof.

How about invading the correct country, if retaliation for 9/11 was really
one of the goals (which it should've been)?