Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:10:00 -0800, "CalifBill"
wrote: wrote in message .. . On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:48:36 -0500, HK wrote: April: Monica Lewinsky will announce her candidacy for President of the United States. She will offer herself as an alternative to Hillary, saying, "It worked before." If Hillary is still winning the nomination by then I am sure Monica will be in the news, along with Vince Foster, Whitewater and the Rose Law Firm. "Sherman, set the wayback machine to 1994" The real question is if Hillary would name Bill as her running mate. Things that make you go "Hmmm" Which brings you back to Monica ;-) Bill's not eligible. Have to be eligible to be POTUS. I read a discussion about a year or so ago about this very thing. The only qualification for Vice President is that the individual must be at least 35 years of age, a natural born citizen of the United States, and a resident of the U.S. for 14 years. The Rules of Succession do not delineate prior service as a disqualification for the office of Vice President as they do for the office of President. Which means that succession to the Presidency isn't in the rules - only being elected to the Presidency is in the rules. According to most constitutional lawyers surveyed in this article, including schools from Harvard's School of Government (or whatever it's called now) to Podunk University scholars, it's perfectly legal to elect a former President to the office of Vice President. Now if you read into that a little, you will find that potentially, the office of Vice President, which does not have term limits, to be a power base from which a smart politician can operate. And if you don't think the Clinton's have thought about it a lot, your nuts. :) |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... Bill's not eligible. Have to be eligible to be POTUS. I read a discussion about a year or so ago about this very thing. The only qualification for Vice President is that the individual must be at least 35 years of age, a natural born citizen of the United States, and a resident of the U.S. for 14 years. The Rules of Succession do not delineate prior service as a disqualification for the office of Vice President as they do for the office of President. Which means that succession to the Presidency isn't in the rules - only being elected to the Presidency is in the rules. According to most constitutional lawyers surveyed in this article, including schools from Harvard's School of Government (or whatever it's called now) to Podunk University scholars, it's perfectly legal to elect a former President to the office of Vice President. Now if you read into that a little, you will find that potentially, the office of Vice President, which does not have term limits, to be a power base from which a smart politician can operate. And if you don't think the Clinton's have thought about it a lot, your nuts. :) OK. But lets say the president dies. Then the vice president becomes president no? Should this be Bill, how does that work with presidential term limits? Bill just does not want to stay away from those interns does he? |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Canuck57 wrote:
Should this be Bill, how does that work with presidential term limits? Bill just does not want to stay away from those interns does he? Why are you so hung up on Bill Clinton's sex life? Do you think his extramarital sex life is more important than the indisputable fact that the current occupant of the White House is in the running for worst president in the history of the United States, and possibly the most incompetent, too? Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 1, 9:35*am, HK wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: Should this be Bill, how does that work with presidential term limits? *Bill just does not want to stay away from those interns does he? Why are you so hung up on Bill Clinton's sex life? Do you think his extramarital sex life is more important than the indisputable fact that the current occupant of the White House is in the running for worst president in the history of the United States, and possibly the most incompetent, too? Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. -- George W. Bush - the 43rd Best President Ever! Ya know Harry, no one really listens anymore cause we all know you just make it up as you go along. You need to stop "lobsta boating" Bush. Now if you really want to talk lets talk about all the missle and nuke technology the Clintons made available to the Chineese Military in exchange for a 3 million dollar donation right before the election. Which they "noticed" and returned soon after the election. Unfortunately, China did not give the information back, they used it to create better missles to take out our sattelites and of course passed it along to nice countries like Korea and Pakastan. The Clintons are about nothing but dirty money, probably the most sold out whitehouse in history. Billary, the most sold out White House in history... |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. krause, there are people who have morals. Sadly, you do not. The above statement demonstrates that. -- Charlie |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:09:17 -0500, Charlie
wrote: HK wrote: Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. krause, there are people who have morals. Sadly, you do not. The above statement demonstrates that. "Intelligence, wit, judgment, and the other talents of the mind, however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which, therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good." Immanuel Kant As defined above I don't see Harry as a moral charlatan - if anything the exact opposite. Then again, I'm a moron - what do I know. :) |
#8
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:14:58 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:09:17 -0500, Charlie wrote: HK wrote: Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. krause, there are people who have morals. Sadly, you do not. The above statement demonstrates that. "Intelligence, wit, judgment, and the other talents of the mind, however they may be named, or courage, resolution, perseverance, as qualities of temperament, are undoubtedly good and desirable in many respects; but these gifts of nature may also become extremely bad and mischievous if the will which is to make use of them, and which, therefore, constitutes what is called character, is not good." Immanuel Kant As defined above I don't see Harry as a moral charlatan - if anything the exact opposite. Then again, I'm a moron - what do I know. :) "...these gifts...may ...become..bad...if the will...is not good." Show me the 'good will'. I've seen plenty of the bad. -- John H |
#9
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
HK wrote:
Canuck57 wrote: Should this be Bill, how does that work with presidential term limits? Bill just does not want to stay away from those interns does he? Why are you so hung up on Bill Clinton's sex life? Do you think his extramarital sex life is more important than the indisputable fact that the current occupant of the White House is in the running for worst president in the history of the United States, and possibly the most incompetent, too? Why do you defend a sex offender, proved liar and disbarred lawyer? Perhaps if *you* had a sex life, you wouldn't be so concerned about Clinton's. Why do you care a lick about Clinton's sex life? |
#10
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 14:32:40 GMT, "Canuck57"
wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message .. . Bill's not eligible. Have to be eligible to be POTUS. I read a discussion about a year or so ago about this very thing. The only qualification for Vice President is that the individual must be at least 35 years of age, a natural born citizen of the United States, and a resident of the U.S. for 14 years. The Rules of Succession do not delineate prior service as a disqualification for the office of Vice President as they do for the office of President. Which means that succession to the Presidency isn't in the rules - only being elected to the Presidency is in the rules. According to most constitutional lawyers surveyed in this article, including schools from Harvard's School of Government (or whatever it's called now) to Podunk University scholars, it's perfectly legal to elect a former President to the office of Vice President. Now if you read into that a little, you will find that potentially, the office of Vice President, which does not have term limits, to be a power base from which a smart politician can operate. And if you don't think the Clinton's have thought about it a lot, your nuts. :) OK. But lets say the president dies. Then the vice president becomes president no? Should this be Bill, how does that work with presidential term limits? Bill just does not want to stay away from those interns does he? From what I read, and it was by no means a complete dissertation, some heavy legal beagle constitutional types were consulted and according to them, there is nothing from preventing a former President, as Vice President, to succeed to the Presidency effectively giving any former President three terms (if it were to work out that way). All the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution says is ""No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once." It's elected - not succession - that was the key point in the discussion. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Anybody see the USA Today fuel price predictions? | General | |||
Best Oscar Predictions | ASA | |||
he can kill angrily if Andy's cup isn't dry | ASA | |||
Predictions | ASA | |||
( OT) Predictions off mark on Iraq war's impact | General |