![]() |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
Chuck Gould wrote:
On Nov 5, 2:51?am, HK wrote: I'm sure Chuck will tell us of the virtues of balsa as a core material. I wouldn't even consider buying a boat with a balsa core. I also don't buy into the boat broker b.s. that osmosis blistering is no big deal. Those guys will do anything to move used boats. I don't want a boat whose bottom is as pustuled and pockmarked as a $3.00 whore. In specific locations, balsa is a fine coring material. I don't like to see it below the waterline. It has been used very successfully for decks, cabin tops, etc. Balsa is rapidly being replaced by better materials that won't absorb water, and some of the most respected brand names core the entire hull. Cabin soles are commonly cored with Nidacor these days, but that was an application where balsa was commonly used and seldom a problem in the past. You get water entry anywhere near balsa and the balsa starts to rot. Simple as that. Got balsa under your fiberglass deck? Got a joint anywhere that lets in water? Loose machine screw not properly sealed? You got balsa rot under your fiberglass deck. They overriding principle is that a boat should be well made, with structural integrity that exceeds the most stringent demands ever likely to be placed upon it. Yeah, well, stuff happens out in the real world. As for blisters, here are some comments from a marine surveyor who hates brokers and the marine industry in general almost as much as you do. :-) As I said, if you want to buy a used boat with as many pustules and pockmocks on her bottom as a $3 whore...go for it. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... With crude oil well over $90/bbl and forecast to hit $100 by the end of the year, we could easily see $4- $4-50 a gallon at gas stations and maybe $6 at fuel docks during next spring's annual gas gouge. If boating is to survive as a pastime and if the manufacturers hope to sell enough boats to survive, the industry has to get some weight out of the boats without sacrificing strength. The solid, hand rolled laminate hull is being supplanted with better alternatives, made possible in part by vacuum infused molding. Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
Eisboch wrote:
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message oups.com... With crude oil well over $90/bbl and forecast to hit $100 by the end of the year, we could easily see $4- $4-50 a gallon at gas stations and maybe $6 at fuel docks during next spring's annual gas gouge. If boating is to survive as a pastime and if the manufacturers hope to sell enough boats to survive, the industry has to get some weight out of the boats without sacrificing strength. The solid, hand rolled laminate hull is being supplanted with better alternatives, made possible in part by vacuum infused molding. Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch I love this line, since it is right out of the PR Department's bullship-ometer: "The solid, hand rolled laminate hull is being supplanted with better alternatives..." Right, of course. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Nov 5, 1:41 pm, HK wrote:
wrote: On Nov 4, 7:30 am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Nov 3, 4:29?pm, HK wrote: Just read that Albemarle was bought out by Brunswick. Another famous line goes in the crapper. Cabo was sold last year. Sad to see the independents disappearing, since they build the best boats. Where have you been, Harry? Brunswick has owned Albermarle for quite while now. Basically, they are built by the same group that makes Hatteras. Many of the upper tier trademarks built by Brunswick are pretty darn good boats. I'm sure they were better boats when the companies that built them were independent. The newest model Albemarle, for example, is wider and with less deadrise than the model it will be replacing. That's corporate conglomerate think for you...take a line of fishing boats and turn them into something less. People often think that just because something is made by small independents that it automatically means better craftmanship and quality, but that just isn't always true. Larger companies have money to use for R&D and testing, plus the tools to ensure quality control. It's entirely dependent on the builder. Yep, there are plenty of crappy small family owned manufacturers out there. The "larger companies" in the boat business seem to blow their R&D and testing budgets on ways to make their boats cheaper. That's just not true or pure speculation. I prefer fiberglass boats built in the old, traditional ways. I like fiberglass just fine, but am also not afraid of other systems of hull manufacter. Proper mold prep, hand layup of the proper cloths by experienced workers, correct amounts of chemicals properly applied, enough time in the molds, Bingo, and that's where a good computerized system can help a great deal. quality inspection by old guys who know what to look for, I'd rather the inspection process involve being able to tell, for instance, whether or not there are any voids in the hull material, than rely on some old guy's poor vision. heavy hardware, heavy construction, et cetera. Heavy doesn't always mean better, or stronger. Hell, a Parker family member personally took and forwarded to me photos of my boats every couple of days while they were under construction.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - And just what did that do for the quality of the boat? |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Nov 5, 11:30?am, "Eisboch" wrote:
Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch No problem for the trawler class- but as we know there is a point at which slowing down a planing hull becomes less economical than staying up on step. If the boat is slightly lighter it may be able to plane more quickly and stay on plane more efficiently. Offshore there is no replacement for displacement- but if the family bow rider destined to zoom around Lake Whatchamacallit on warm summer afternoons and in fair weather can be lightened up a few hundred pounds without sacrificing structural integrty- that's probably a good thing. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
HK wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: HK wrote: Reginald P. Smithers III wrote: wrote: On Nov 4, 7:30 am, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Nov 3, 4:29?pm, HK wrote: Just read that Albemarle was bought out by Brunswick. Another famous line goes in the crapper. Cabo was sold last year. Sad to see the independents disappearing, since they build the best boats. Where have you been, Harry? Brunswick has owned Albermarle for quite while now. Basically, they are built by the same group that makes Hatteras. Many of the upper tier trademarks built by Brunswick are pretty darn good boats. I'm sure they were better boats when the companies that built them were independent. The newest model Albemarle, for example, is wider and with less deadrise than the model it will be replacing. That's corporate conglomerate think for you...take a line of fishing boats and turn them into something less. People often think that just because something is made by small independents that it automatically means better craftmanship and quality, but that just isn't always true. Larger companies have money to use for R&D and testing, plus the tools to ensure quality control. Of course you are correct. I personally would hate to pay for a one off car. After watching American Hotrod, I would seriously question the quality of some of these smaller builders. I would assume it is very similar in with small boat builders. I wouldn't buy a motorcycle from any of the televised "chopper" show shops, because it is obvious that the builders are not overly concerned with the vagaries of metallurgy. Small boat building among the quality builders is an entirely different proposition; the "flashboat" builders may change everything every year, but the quality builders do not. Parker has been building hulls for a long, long time. Most of the hulls are very similar in design, no matter their length, and so are the materials, though "thickness" varies. Same with hardware. Same with assembly. Next year, Parker will introduce a 34-footer with twin 350-hp Yamahas. I suspect the boat will be very competent. I don't think I have seen a Parker on my little body of water, but Grady Whites are very common. While I would not consider them a small boat builder, they are not part of a conglomerate. On the lake, they have clubs who will haul their boats to the ocean for group fishing tournaments. By the same token, there are many conglomerate car mfg'ers including BMW and Lexus who have managed to build a car to the masses and keep quality at a very high level. Gradys are great boats, very similar in construction if not in looks to Parkers. I'd buy one, but they are just "too fancy" for my style of feeeeshing. I have no idea why Gradys would be big sellers on Lake Lanier or any other small inland lake. i don't think many people who boat exclusively on Lake Lanier would buy a Grady, but there are many people who boat on Lake Lanier who will regularly trailer their boats 4 hours to the Georgia or SC coast. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
"Chuck Gould" wrote in message ups.com... On Nov 5, 11:30?am, "Eisboch" wrote: Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch No problem for the trawler class- but as we know there is a point at which slowing down a planing hull becomes less economical than staying up on step. If the boat is slightly lighter it may be able to plane more quickly and stay on plane more efficiently. Offshore there is no replacement for displacement- but if the family bow rider destined to zoom around Lake Whatchamacallit on warm summer afternoons and in fair weather can be lightened up a few hundred pounds without sacrificing structural integrty- that's probably a good thing. Agreed. I thought we were talking about high end sportsfishing boats. To me, that means an offshore boat, but I hear you. I learned a lesson about the newer, lighter sportsfishing boats with the Egg Harbor I had. Beautiful boat ... well built ... but would loosen your fillings on a rough outing unless you slowed way down. I guess that's why I still like the Navigator. Not fast, but fast enough for fuel efficient cruising (which is my interest) and a soft, comfortable ride in some fairly heavy seas. Eisboch |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
"Reginald P. Smithers III" wrote in message . .. i don't think many people who boat exclusively on Lake Lanier would buy a Grady, but there are many people who boat on Lake Lanier who will regularly trailer their boats 4 hours to the Georgia or SC coast. Just watched a news report. Not too many people boating on Lake Lanier .... period. Back to Gradys. They are very popular up here in the northeast. I think there are more of them around than any other manufacturer including Boston Whaler. There's a large Grady dealer here in my hometown who stocks and sells a lot of them. Eisboch |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 10:28:39 -0500, Gene Kearns
wrote: Albemarle and Hatteras were originally designed as sport fishers for the North Carolina coast. Hatteras hasn't been Hatteras since the High Point, NC factory closed and the "Hatteras Collection" has "evolved" to the point that it has as much in common with sportfishing as a metrosexual does with a salt water tackle box. ROTFL!!! You do make a good point though - the Hatteras line is definetly not what it used to be in terms of style and function. I don't know about NC, but there is a thriving business up in this area with older sport fishers and the refurbishment of same. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:49 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com