![]() |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:10:00 -0600, Vic Smith wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:01:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:35:20 -0500, HK wrote: I have no objection to modern materials in the hull, but I'd not buy any boat with foam in between the hull skins. Why? I've read that pounding eventually destroys the foam's structure/strength, leading to excessive hull flex. Yep. That's what I remember reading. I've heard that before, but I'm not at all sure that it is true with closed cell foam. I saw a 12 year old Ranger 318 VS when it was being cut up and the foam flotation looked brand new. Fresh water bass boats don't take much of a pounding. Besides, they have low sides. Further, we're not talking about flotation. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
Vic Smith wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:01:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:35:20 -0500, HK wrote: I have no objection to modern materials in the hull, but I'd not buy any boat with foam in between the hull skins. Why? I've read that pounding eventually destroys the foam's structure/strength, leading to excessive hull flex. Yep. That's what I remember reading. --Vic There's that, there's the thinner skins on each side, there's the water that can get between the foam and the skins when the skins work... |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
Wayne.B wrote:
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:44:47 -0500, HK wrote: My first sailboat on the Bay was from the wonderful folks who brought us Tiara. S2 9.2. Just under 30', and a wide-bodied slowpoke. But it was easy to sail. It's hard to imagine you in an old slow boat like that. Our old slow GB will run circles around a 30 ft sailboat, and do it with a great deal more comfort. It was only a year old when I bought it and as I posted, it was easy to sail, and fun, too. Sitting in an oversized old tub of a GB is not my kind of boating. It wasn't then, and it isn't now. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 17:07:41 -0500, HK wrote:
Absolutely, although 700 hp is about the norm for an offshore sportfish boat of that size. The engines will be about $18,000 each through Parker, I would guess. That would be the fully rigged price. $36,000 for the pair. I wonder what a pair of new 350 hp diesels, fully rigged, with transmissions, goes for these days? Let's say...$80,000+, or a $44,000 difference. It's going to take a hell of a lot of diesel efficiency to make that up! Well, lets run the numbers just for the fun of it. Your price estimate is in the ball park so let's figure out what the payback is over 5 years or so. Assuming the diesels will return 50% of their extra cost on resale, the number to meet is $22,000. With the pair of big OBs the boat will burn about 50 gph, 25 gph with diesels. Gas at the marina is about $4, diesel about $3, cost per hour $200 gas, $75 diesel, $125 delta. $22,000 divided by $125 is 176 hours. That is the break even point. If you use the boat more than 176 hours you are money ahead on operating costs alone. Factor in the reliability and longevity of diesels and you are way ahead if you use the boat regularly. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Nov 5, 2:14?pm, HK wrote:
Chuck Gould wrote: On Nov 5, 1:33?pm, HK wrote: Chuck Gould wrote: On Nov 5, 11:35?am, HK wrote: Eisboch wrote: "Chuck Gould" wrote in message glegroups.com... With crude oil well over $90/bbl and forecast to hit $100 by the end of the year, we could easily see $4- $4-50 a gallon at gas stations and maybe $6 at fuel docks during next spring's annual gas gouge. If boating is to survive as a pastime and if the manufacturers hope to sell enough boats to survive, the industry has to get some weight out of the boats without sacrificing strength. The solid, hand rolled laminate hull is being supplanted with better alternatives, made possible in part by vacuum infused molding. Making boats lighter has more implications than saving a few bucks worth of fuel. Leave them heavy and drive slower, I say. Eisboch I love this line, since it is right out of the PR Department's bullship-ometer: "The solid, hand rolled laminate hull is being supplanted with better alternatives..." Right, of course.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I'm sure you consider Hinckley a piece of crap. None of their lobster or picnic style boats would ever compare to yours, I'm certain of that. If you might be interested in a general description of how a well respected E Coast boat is built, follow this link: http://hinckleyyachts.com/home.html Select "Under the Skin", and then select item 5 on the illustration. Omigawd. Kevlar and carbon fiber composites! (Watch the video- see the bagged hull). Better run over there quick, Harry, and let them know they don't have the first clue about how to build a boat. Obviously a solid, hand rolled, FRP hull would be vastly superior to anything Hinckley is putting out.....right? I thought we were discussing sal****er fishing boats.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I thought I was responding to your comment that my remark (about modern composite construction offering some opportunities to improve upon traditional hand rolled rove and resin) "pegged the Bullship-o- meter" and was straight off the PR desk. My response consists of an observation that Hinckley, normally considered among today's finest boat builders, uses a "composite", rather than hand rolled hull. No bullship. Chuck...I have no problems with "modern" composite hulls, so long as the composite does not include foamboard or balsa.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Then why does a statement that modern composite construction is supplanting traditional hand rolled rove and resin "peg the bullship-o- meter"? |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:55:46 -0500, HK wrote:
There haven't been any real "Bertrams" for years, just boats made by successive companies that bought the Bertram name before, during and after manufacturing started and stopped...Whittaker, Bertram Trojan, Feretti and others have owned the name. There are lots of used ones from the 80s still going strong. They are such great boats that it pays to do a refurb on them and bring them back to like new. You can buy a used 46 for 200K or so, put 2 or 300 into a complete refit and still be way ahead of a new boat of comparable quality. |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:37:32 -0500, HK wrote:
It's hard to imagine you in an old slow boat like that. Our old slow GB will run circles around a 30 ft sailboat, and do it with a great deal more comfort. It was only a year old when I bought it and as I posted, it was easy to sail, and fun, too. Sitting in an oversized old tub of a GB is not my kind of boating. It wasn't then, and it isn't now. Sez the guy who's never tried it. :-) |
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
|
Another quality boat manufacturer sells out.
On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:02:30 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote: On Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:55:46 -0500, HK wrote: There haven't been any real "Bertrams" for years, just boats made by successive companies that bought the Bertram name before, during and after manufacturing started and stopped...Whittaker, Bertram Trojan, Feretti and others have owned the name. There are lots of used ones from the 80s still going strong. They are such great boats that it pays to do a refurb on them and bring them back to like new. You can buy a used 46 for 200K or so, put 2 or 300 into a complete refit and still be way ahead of a new boat of comparable quality. That's the way I've been thinking lately after seeing a '47 Post that was refurbished. I've seen a couple of insurance boats that would make good candidates for this approach. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com