![]() |
Oh deer!
On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:41:55 -0400, Reginald P. Smithers III penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats: Gene Kearns wrote: I agree the wildlife should be able to use any available habitat even if it is our lawn, our lake, our vegetable garden or our flowers. Not with my azaleas, vegetables, and etc. they don't. I live in a rural area and the critters that think they can ravage my little part of the universe (I've let them have about 80% of my property for their use) end up next to my mashed potatoes and green beans. -- Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Oak Island, NC. Homepage http://pamandgene.idleplay.net/ Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats ----------------- www.Newsgroup-Binaries.com - *Completion*Retention*Speed* Access your favorite newsgroups from home or on the road ----------------- |
Oh deer!
"HK" wrote in message
... JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "HK" wrote in message ... Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:45:42 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "HK" wrote in message . .. Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:11:53 -0400, HK wrote: Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. I wouldn't "carry" a semi without a real safety, either, though I do like shooting a Glock at the range. Is that a single or double action .357? single action hammerless. Wouldn't want it to get caught on the shirt. :) Geeez. I'm pretty sure I've never seen a SA hammerless .357 mag. But there's a lot of pistols I've not seen. If it is hammerless, how do you cock it? Oy. You don't cock it. http://www.ruger-firearms.com/Firear...ion&fam lst=9 Thank you. Intersting Harry has never seen one. They are pretty common. As I said, the only SA action revolvers I have handled were "traditional." The photo on the page you reference there seems to be a DA ruger. I think you're losing track of the discussion. You said this: "Geeez. I'm pretty sure I've never seen a SA hammerless .357 mag. But there's a lot of pistols I've not seen. If it is hammerless, how do you cock it?" OK now? That's what we were responding to. However, to be fair, I ignored "SA" because it wasn't relevant, compared to "hammerless". Obviously, the two ideas don't belong together, and "SA" has no relevance to this discussion. It did to me. Tom said he carried a single action hammerless revolver. I was curious how he cocked it. So there! OK. That's true. Maybe Tom was messing with your head, something that's never happened before in this NG. |
Oh deer!
"end.user" invalid.reply.2.newsgroup wrote in message
... "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message ... **snip** Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. I think you need to check again. A .357 will chamber a .38 special, a .38 special CANNOT chamber a .357. The .357 case is quite a bit longer than a .38. Yeah, but he said "frame". For certain calibers, including .357, there are various frame sizes, which is why Smith & Wesson designate as K-frame, J-frame, etc. There were, in fact, a few .357s build on a light frame. This doesn't mean a short cylinder. It means other parts of the gun are lighter-skinnier whatever. This, in turn, is why you'll see discussions where people say "That hand load's fine for this model .357, but no way you should load rounds that hot for THAT model .357". |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:55:36 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:52:12 -0500, John H. wrote: Dogs don't work. My brother had dogs on the golf course he managed. The geese would just fly into the water when the dog came. The dog couldn't swim fast enough to scare the geese. You got the wrong trainer. The dog isn't supposed to chase them into the water. I work with BCs here in and around golf courses and haven't ever had that problem. It's all in how the dogs are trained. The dogs don't 'chase' them into the water, the friggin' geese get smart quick and fly into the friggin' water as soon as they see the dog! There must be some stupid friggin' geese up there! |
Oh deer!
wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:11:53 -0400, HK wrote: wouldn't "carry" a semi without a real safety, either, though I do like shooting a Glock at the range. The Glock is supposed to mimic the action of a revolver shooting double action. They don't have a safety either. ... nor does my KP90, same theory. You are supposed to be carrying "de-cocked" Ruger KP90? You like? |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:05:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: Careful. You sound like some "folks" who think anyone who reads and learns is an elitist. Hmm. Typical educated cop response. --Vic |
Oh deer!
"Vic Smith" wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:05:14 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: Careful. You sound like some "folks" who think anyone who reads and learns is an elitist. Hmm. Typical educated cop response. --Vic Quota? Nah. I can write as many tickets as I want. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:55:52 -0400, HK wrote:
Real purty. I sometimes use them but prefer my M5 with ACP's for the heavy action. This is when playing SWAT 4, a terrific game. Did I tell you I live in Morton Grove, IL? They've outlawed bears, cougars and handguns. --Vic So, you keep your Israeli handgun concealed, eh? Went over my head. I don't know much about guns, although years ago I subscribed to Guns and was pretty advanced in my dreaming. But there was this place in Marietta Georgia I stopped once when I drove to Florida with a buddy. Called the Bulletstop. Think it was '85, when the Bears played the Dolphins in the superbowl. Shot clips from an Uzi, and a Thompson. It was fun, but expensive. I think if I ever felt the need to "protect my family" I'd have a Remington 12 autoloader to sleep with, and get a big pillow to keep it under. --Vic |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com