Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:55:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:47:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:



Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit.

Taste like chicken? Never had it myself, though I've had turtle
and squirrel once each. The squirrel wasn't cooked right and
was tough and tasteless. The turtle tasted...like chicken.

--Vic


http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/6378/

Thanks. The link didn't work. But that's good.
My doctor told me not to eat rodents.

--Vic

Oh deer!
 

wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:01:41 -0400, HK wrote:

It did to me. Tom said he carried a single action hammerless revolver.
I was curious how he cocked it. So there!


I thought it was a joke ... sort of like "write only storage"

PROM?

Oh deer!
 

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:55:56 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:47:00 -0500, John H.
wrote:



Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit.

Taste like chicken? Never had it myself, though I've had turtle
and squirrel once each. The squirrel wasn't cooked right and
was tough and tasteless. The turtle tasted...like chicken.

--Vic


http://www.recipeland.com/recipe/6378/

Thanks. The link didn't work.

Your browser is retarded.

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@4ax. com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote:

The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down
one per round, with a 2" revolver.

I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto
hand guns.

With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate.

One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the
range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea.

All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to
the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues,
the more the used them.

He took his time, minimum shots and did well.

It's the revolver training.

I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For
just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame.

Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's
but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!).

Nope - just the way I spake it.

Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch
of .357 mags going through it?

What part of this is so hard to understand?

The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame.

Ruger SP101

Hello? Anybody home?

You god damned people will agrue about anything.

I'm outa here for a while.

Morons.

No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for
information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was
built for .38's.

Now I'm 'god damned' and a 'moron'.

I'm sorry you're ****ed. But, if I said I had a .38 on a .22 frame,
wouldn't you wonder a little?

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:07:58 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:



Thanks. The link didn't work.

Your browser is retarded.

Sure it did. But if I let you know that the joke wouldn't work.
Assuming you got the joke. Assuming it *was* a joke.

--Vic

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 13:23:40 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 12:30:51 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote:


"Vic Smith" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:05:26 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:41:55 -0400, Reginald P. Smithers III penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

Gene Kearns wrote:

I agree the wildlife should be able to use any available habitat even
if
it is our lawn, our lake, our vegetable garden or our flowers.

Not with my azaleas, vegetables, and etc. they don't. I live in a
rural area and the critters that think they can ravage my little part
of the universe (I've let them have about 80% of my property for their
use) end up next to my mashed potatoes and green beans.

My wife has an extensive garden. She hates rabbits.

--Vic

Let the wildlife use any available habitat? Is he crazy? (no need to
answer that one)

Hey, who's crazy. The critter lovers or the guy who thinks he's
growing mashed potatoes?

--Vic

The person who thinks wildlife should be able to use any available habitat
including folks gardens, shrubs and other things they grew. I have no
problem watching hummingbirds and butterflies sipping the nectar from our
flowers. I do have a problem with bambi and company eating the flowers and
greenery we planted.

Totally agree. That's Smithers.
But I still find it odd that Gene grows mashed potatoes.
So it's still a tossup.

--Vic

Oh deer!
 

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
. ..
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
m...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465 @4ax.com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote:

The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot
down
one per round, with a 2" revolver.

I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round
semi-auto
hand guns.

With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate.

One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6
rounds
to the
range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea.

All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went
to
the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were
issues,
the more the used them.

He took his time, minimum shots and did well.

It's the revolver training.

I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods.
For
just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame.

Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman
shoots
.38's
but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!).

Nope - just the way I spake it.

Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a
bunch
of .357 mags going through it?

What part of this is so hard to understand?

The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame.

Ruger SP101

Hello? Anybody home?

You god damned people will agrue about anything.

I'm outa here for a while.

Morons.

No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for
information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the
frame
was
built for .38's.


Look at the top strap, Einstein.


Ah, another name-caller!

Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a
'top
strap'?

Is there one in this photo?

http://tinyurl.com/lw55

Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on?
That's actually called the top strap.


Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they
have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame?

No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to
read a lot.

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"John H." wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o465@4a x.com...
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote:

The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot
down
one per round, with a 2" revolver.

I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto
hand guns.

With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate.

One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds
to the
range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea.

All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to
the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues,
the more the used them.

He took his time, minimum shots and did well.

It's the revolver training.

I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For
just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame.

Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots
.38's
but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!).

Nope - just the way I spake it.

Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a
bunch
of .357 mags going through it?

What part of this is so hard to understand?

The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame.

Ruger SP101

Hello? Anybody home?

You god damned people will agrue about anything.

I'm outa here for a while.

Morons.

No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for
information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame
was
built for .38's.


Look at the top strap, Einstein.


Ah, another name-caller!

Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top
strap'?

Is there one in this photo?

http://tinyurl.com/lw55

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:24:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote:

"Vic Smith" wrote in message
.. .
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:05:26 -0400, Gene Kearns
wrote:

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 17:41:55 -0400, Reginald P. Smithers III penned
the following well considered thoughts to the readers of rec.boats:

Gene Kearns wrote:

I agree the wildlife should be able to use any available habitat even if
it is our lawn, our lake, our vegetable garden or our flowers.

Not with my azaleas, vegetables, and etc. they don't. I live in a
rural area and the critters that think they can ravage my little part
of the universe (I've let them have about 80% of my property for their
use) end up next to my mashed potatoes and green beans.

My wife has an extensive garden. She hates rabbits.

--Vic


Rabbits were put here to cook. They're delicious.


Ah, something on which we agree! I grew up on fried rabbit.

Oh deer!
 

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:30:24 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:47:33 -0500, Vic Smith
wrote:



I saw the Border Collies in action once, and they would swim after the
geese that lit in the water. The geese would take off after the dog
swam a short distance. I guess there's geese and geese, dogs and
dogs.

--Vic

It could also depend on the size of the pond/lake. The geese to which I'm
referring would take off and fly to the other side of the water. Poor dog
would wear himself out in no time.

Yeah, I was thinking along those lines, and forgot to mention the
lagoons weren't too wide, maybe 50 yards.
But what you said about smart geese might have something to it.
I wondered why the geese didn't fly down the lagoon a bit and land
again, but they didn't - they just flew off.
Might also be the dogs I saw somehow let the geese know something
you and me don't understand. I used to be a horseplayer, and have
read and believe that a better horse ("classier") can run up on a
cheaper horse and just by eyeballing him for a few strides make him
give up. Maybe there's a dog/goose version of that.

--Vic