|
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? |
Oh deer!
JimH wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. Well, he could go to that newsgroup he's always touting...what is it... ahh a.politics. But he'd only find himself to play with, and he'd surely turn himself down. |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:08:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s4o ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Actually, I used Google to find the specs I gave you above. I could find nothing on the site you provided saying anything about the SP101 being a ..38 frame. I did read that it was designed to be a small, strong .357 Magnum. Help! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote:
JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:39:32 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. I've argued about nothing. I'm simply trying to find something saying that a Ruger .357 Magnum pistol was built on a .38 frame. No, you're not trying to find anything. You're trying to get other people to do the work for you. You want a secretary? Hire one. Otherwise, keep reading. |
Oh deer!
"John H." wrote in message
... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. |
Oh deer!
JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:46:04 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:18:52 -0400, HK wrote: JoeSpareBedroom wrote: "John H." wrote in message Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Long one of my favorite shooting sites, but you can see the desperation in the right's politics...he's endorsed Tired Old Fred, with the same ideas that brought us...Iraq. Actually, Harry, we're not discussing politics at all. We're discussing the frame used for the Ruger SP101. There is no "we" that includes you until you spend a day or ten reading. Otherwise, you can't possibly know what you're talking about. Is your public library open on weekends? Does the "home" have a shuttle bus that'll bring you there? See previous answer to you. And, see answer to JimH. And, see answer to Harry. You guys have a lot of words to say, but none have shown anything that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. I can't believe that of you five people, *none* of you would come up with the proof, if it exists, simply to prove me wrong...although I've not asserted that it *wasn't* built on a .38 frame. So, if someone else has knowledge, they are required to dredge up sources for you, while you sit on your wet diaper and watch television. Not a chance. Why is Herring "answering" me? He and that other douchebag, Reggie Retardo, are not on my "read" or "respond" list. Hell, my email filter has Herring and his aliases *blacklisted." |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 7 Sep 2007 15:39:32 -0400, "JimH" ask wrote:
"John H." wrote in message ... Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Looks like SW Tom was right. Some folks just want to argue..........about anything.....here. John, maybe there is an rec.arguing NG you can spend your day at. I've argued about nothing. I'm simply trying to find something saying that a Ruger .357 Magnum pistol was built on a .38 frame. If I were arguing, I'd say that Tom's statement might have been a little in error. But, I'm not saying that at all. Let's see, five different people have called me names or made derogatory comments because I asked a question. Wow! |
Oh deer!
On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:42:27 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:08:19 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:38:43 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:51:59 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:2b33e3lt3kbdqa0rm1i7q2nlgqcckbs1r7@4ax .com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:20:21 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:oo13e3h766n56tof420chhq3vmd19jvnk3@4 ax.com... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:53:52 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 11:13:29 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:50:24 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:46:02 -0500, John H. wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:55 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing wrote: On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:25:54 GMT, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote: "Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message news:u382e3ts8i22s7a6hjrvd4abtcu8s ... On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:17 -0400, wrote: The winner was always an old sargent who took his time and shot down one per round, with a 2" revolver. I have said for years that the reason is due to 13 round semi-auto hand guns. With a revolver, you only have six - makes you concentrate. One of my favorite gun technique books suggests taking only 6 rounds to the range, no matter what kind of handgun you're shooting. Good idea. All my kids were trained that way. In fact, when my youngest went to the Academy in SC, he noticed that the more bullets they were issues, the more the used them. He took his time, minimum shots and did well. It's the revolver training. I have a 9mm Glock, but I never carry it unless I'm in the woods. For just carrying purposes, it's a .357 mag on a .38 frame. Don't you mean that the other way around? My Highway Patrolman shoots .38's but is a .357 magnum frame (and shoots them!). Nope - just the way I spake it. Wouldn't a gun with a frame built for .38's be somewhat unsafe with a bunch of .357 mags going through it? What part of this is so hard to understand? The gun is a .357 mag built on a .38 frame. Ruger SP101 Hello? Anybody home? You god damned people will agrue about anything. I'm outa here for a while. Morons. No argument exists. I was simply asking a question. I looked for information on the Ruger SP101, but could find nothing saying the frame was built for .38's. Look at the top strap, Einstein. Ah, another name-caller! Enlighten me, please. I am certainly no expert on pistols. What is a 'top strap'? Is there one in this photo? http://tinyurl.com/lw55 Yes, there is. See the black grip with the silver screw holding it on? That's actually called the top strap. Those are grip inserts. I've never heard them called 'top straps'. Do they have a stamp on them somewhere saying the frame is a .38 caliber frame? No. You just have to know these things. One high-tech way of knowing is to read a lot. Well, here's the site with all the specs and such. Perhaps you could point me to where it says the Ruger SP101 pistol is built on a .38 frame. Or, please point me to anything that says that. I'll admit to not reading a whole lot about pistols. Here's a site that gives enough information for people who know something about pistols. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_SP101.htm Call your local police station and ask whether it's legal to use google in your town. That should help you find the information you need. Actually, I used Google to find the specs I gave you above. I could find nothing on the site you provided saying anything about the SP101 being a .38 frame. I did read that it was designed to be a small, strong .357 Magnum. Help! You haven't read enough. You have no secretary here. Since you have nothing better to do, continue doing your homework, or shut your trap. In other words, you know of nothing that says the Ruger SP101, a .357 Magnum revolver, was built on a .38 frame. Well, why did you bother to enter the discussion at all? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:05 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com