On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 01:29:30 GMT, Short Wave Sportfishing
wrote:

On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 20:16:09 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:


"Short Wave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 00:39:18 GMT, "CalifBill"
wrote:

Maybe it is all the short people that are humor challenged. And you are
shorter than me, shortie.

Probably - but I'm better looking, smarter and just a much more
worthwhile person. :)

I used to be taller than I am now. I also am losing my sense of humor and
am not anywhere near as worthwhile as I used to be. Just ask Mrs.E.

Funny you should mention that. I'm actually almost a inch and a half
shorter than I was at age 20.

I have never lost my sense of humor, but sadly, Mrs. Wave has less
tolerance for the shenanigans than she used to be - she keeps telling
me I'm not 25 anymore. :)

Women - can't live with them, can't live without them.

At that rate of height loss, it'll be several hundred years before you're
nothing.

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not that
he *didn't* have one.


I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!



Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.

How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not that
he *didn't* have one.

I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!


Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.

How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?


What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



That came nowhere close to answering my question.

"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not
that
he *didn't* have one.

I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!


Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping
here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.

How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?


What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



That came nowhere close to answering my question.

It wasn't his offer to to a "write-up" that bothered me . It was his
out-of-the blue admonishment that Harry "come clean" because it's "good for
the soul" in a lecture style. Who cares?

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 08:16:01 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:
On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause

wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:
JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat, not
that
he *didn't* have one.
I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!

Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping
here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.
How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?

What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.


That came nowhere close to answering my question.

It wasn't his offer to to a "write-up" that bothered me . It was his
out-of-the blue admonishment that Harry "come clean" because it's "good for
the soul" in a lecture style. Who cares?

Harry cares.

Harry has been cowed lately, the question is why. Typically at this time
of year Harry is spouting off about how bad the Republicans are going to
loose and what the Democrats are going to do once they get back in
control of Congress or the White House.

Why is Harry silent on the political front?

"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..


Why is Harry silent on the political front?

Because there's really no one to talk to?

Eisboch

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat,
not that
he *didn't* have one.


I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!



Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.


How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?



What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



Plus the "come clean" comment.
I'd hate to think John is 'facilitating' again.

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/5/2006 9:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

Why is Harry silent on the political front?

Because there's really no one to talk to?

Eisboch



I don't post that much here anymore. There's only a couple of people
left here, you among them, that I like and find interesting. The netcops
have turned this newsgroup into a pile of steaming dung, suitable mostly
for their overwrought and uncritical advertorials.

Meaning that you have been shown to be a biased lying fool whose sole
purpose is grinding an axe.

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 10:56:27 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/5/2006 9:50 AM, Eisboch wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

Why is Harry silent on the political front?

Because there's really no one to talk to?

Eisboch




I don't post that much here anymore. There's only a couple of people
left here, you among them, that I like and find interesting. The netcops
have turned this newsgroup into a pile of steaming dung, suitable mostly
for their overwrought and uncritical advertorials.

Gosh Harry, I never realized a couple well-meaning people could have such
an influence on you.

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:15:59 GMT, Don White wrote:

Harry Krause wrote:
On 11/5/2006 7:47 AM, JohnH wrote:

On Sat, 04 Nov 2006 17:25:41 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

On 11/4/2006 5:19 PM, Don White wrote:

JohnH wrote:

Don, I think Chuck was inferring that Harry *had* a lobster boat,
not that
he *didn't* have one.


I think I'd be willing to bet a 'toonie' on that one.
Me right...you wrong!



Chuck is ****ed at me because I am annoyed at his petty netcopping here.
The netcoppers remind me of grammar school recess monitors, the ones
everyone wanted to beat the crap out of and sometimes did. Only the
prissy sissies liked the monitors.


How does an offer to write up your boat result in, "Chuck is ****ed at
me..."?



What? Why would I want or need Mr. Advertorial to do a "write-up" for
me? If I wanted a "write-up," I'd write it myself. Without the purple
prose.



Plus the "come clean" comment.
I'd hate to think John is 'facilitating' again.

Harry needs no facilitating.