Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
I doubt if there's much difference between the Parker's cabin height and the Grady's hardtop height. The beam would be a problem, though. Looks like permits would be required. There is a significant difference in the *towing profile* and weight of the respective boats. -- Skipper |
#2
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:20:57 -0600, Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: I doubt if there's much difference between the Parker's cabin height and the Grady's hardtop height. The beam would be a problem, though. Looks like permits would be required. There is a significant difference in the *towing profile* and weight of the respective boats. Conceded. But, I'd never buy a boat for its towing profile, What, on the water, would make you prefer the 228 Grady to the 2520xl Parker? -- John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#3
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
There is a significant difference in the *towing profile* and weight of the respective boats. Conceded. But, I'd never buy a boat for its towing profile, What, on the water, would make you prefer the 228 Grady to the 2520xl Parker? The overall experience with this usage. The Grady makes the Cortez a realistic adventure. The Parker precludes anything but the same ol' local same ol'. An on-the-water Cortez adventure *far* exceeds anything you'll ever find on the Chesapeake. -- Skipper |
#4
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:58:11 -0600, Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: There is a significant difference in the *towing profile* and weight of the respective boats. Conceded. But, I'd never buy a boat for its towing profile, What, on the water, would make you prefer the 228 Grady to the 2520xl Parker? The overall experience with this usage. The Grady makes the Cortez a realistic adventure. The Parker precludes anything but the same ol' local same ol'. An on-the-water Cortez adventure *far* exceeds anything you'll ever find on the Chesapeake. [Damn, this is harder than pulling hen's teeth!] Skipper, what *overall experience with this usage*? Why would the Grady make the adventure any more realistic than the Parker? We aren't discussing the Sea of Cortez versus the Chesapeake Bay. They're two entirely different things. We were talking, I thought, about the merits of two boats on the Sea of Cortez. -- John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#5
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
JohnH wrote:
The overall experience with this usage. The Grady makes the Cortez a realistic adventure. The Parker precludes anything but the same ol' local same ol'. An on-the-water Cortez adventure *far* exceeds anything you'll ever find on the Chesapeake. [Damn, this is harder than pulling hen's teeth!] Skipper, what *overall experience with this usage*? Why would the Grady make the adventure any more realistic than the Parker? Suppose if you made two trips, one with the Parker and another with the Grady you'd understand. Towability is an important factor in the overall experience. -- Skipper |
#6
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:57:51 -0600, Skipper wrote:
JohnH wrote: The overall experience with this usage. The Grady makes the Cortez a realistic adventure. The Parker precludes anything but the same ol' local same ol'. An on-the-water Cortez adventure *far* exceeds anything you'll ever find on the Chesapeake. [Damn, this is harder than pulling hen's teeth!] Skipper, what *overall experience with this usage*? Why would the Grady make the adventure any more realistic than the Parker? Suppose if you made two trips, one with the Parker and another with the Grady you'd understand. Towability is an important factor in the overall experience. Damnit! I've already conceded the towability issue. Now - we're there. We have two boats, a Grady 228 and a Parker 2520XL. Which would do better crossing the Sea of Corte's, and why so? -- John H ****************************************** ***** Have a Spectacular Day! ***** ****************************************** |
#7
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JohnH" wrote in message ... On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:57:51 -0600, Skipper wrote: JohnH wrote: The overall experience with this usage. The Grady makes the Cortez a realistic adventure. The Parker precludes anything but the same ol' local same ol'. An on-the-water Cortez adventure *far* exceeds anything you'll ever find on the Chesapeake. [Damn, this is harder than pulling hen's teeth!] Skipper, what *overall experience with this usage*? Why would the Grady make the adventure any more realistic than the Parker? Suppose if you made two trips, one with the Parker and another with the Grady you'd understand. Towability is an important factor in the overall experience. Damnit! I've already conceded the towability issue. Now - we're there. We have two boats, a Grady 228 and a Parker 2520XL. Which would do better crossing the Sea of Corte's, and why so? -- John H Skippy is playing you like a violin John. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: WaveSport Godzilla - Don't Wait 'till Spring! | General | |||
Things I Don't Like.... | ASA | |||
40 things | General | |||
Submerge the Trailer When We Launch a Boat? | General | |||
Neal--how are things in Florida? | ASA |