*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Ignoring all the BS, do you still doubt this is the "real" Skipper?

Eisboch


snip
.....I now believe that this obviously sick and troubled
individual is the original Dave Mann.

snip


Good. I will wait for a proper apology from you for your whopper of a lie
about me.


I jumped to a hasty conclusion based upon some rather convincing
evidence.
(Past behavior and the coincidental use of an identical and extremely
unusual posting format). Even Smithers noted that he would have
suspected your hand in the matter, but he drew some other conclusions
based upon something he noticed in the header. I should not have
expressed my conclusion, but I did.
I have already apologized for that. That's what I did wrong, so that's
the apology you get. Reaching the conclusion was an error, not a lie,
and in any case I should have kept it to myself, (as I do most of my
opinions about you and your behavior).

wrote:

I jumped to a hasty conclusion based upon some rather convincing
evidence.
(Past behavior and the coincidental use of an identical and extremely
unusual posting format). Even Smithers noted that he would have
suspected your hand in the matter, but he drew some other conclusions
based upon something he noticed in the header. I should not have
expressed my conclusion, but I did.
I have already apologized for that. That's what I did wrong, so that's
the apology you get. Reaching the conclusion was an error, not a lie,
and in any case I should have kept it to myself, (as I do most of my
opinions about you and your behavior).

As I've said before, that's all the apology you're going to get from
this swadifying spinmeister: http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

"Skipper" wrote in message
...
wrote:

I jumped to a hasty conclusion based upon some rather convincing
evidence.
(Past behavior and the coincidental use of an identical and extremely
unusual posting format). Even Smithers noted that he would have
suspected your hand in the matter, but he drew some other conclusions
based upon something he noticed in the header. I should not have
expressed my conclusion, but I did.
I have already apologized for that. That's what I did wrong, so that's
the apology you get. Reaching the conclusion was an error, not a lie,
and in any case I should have kept it to myself, (as I do most of my
opinions about you and your behavior).

As I've said before, that's all the apology you're going to get from
this swadifying spinmeister: http://tinyurl.com/8tt8k

--
Skipper

Indeed.

Chuckies explanation of a lie is that it was an assumption.

I gave him several chances to apologize. He refused.

End of discussion on my part.

wrote in message
ups.com...

*JimH* wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Eisboch wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Ignoring all the BS, do you still doubt this is the "real" Skipper?

Eisboch


snip
.....I now believe that this obviously sick and troubled
individual is the original Dave Mann.

snip


Good. I will wait for a proper apology from you for your whopper of a
lie
about me.


I jumped to a hasty conclusion based upon some rather convincing
evidence.
snip
I have already apologized for that.

No you haven't.

That's what I did wrong, so that's
the apology you get.
snip

Your "apology" to me was nothing more than an attempt to explain why you did
what you did and blame me in part for your lie.

As Skipper said, and as I suspected, you are not man enough to make a true
apology.

You remain a liar in my eyes, as well as one who cannot apologize for the
lie. You also are now less than a real man.

End of discussion on this Chuckie. Go back to whatever you do in your
pathetic life.

wrote:
*JimH* wrote:

wrote in message
groups.com...

Eisboch wrote:

wrote in message
legroups.com...

Ignoring all the BS, do you still doubt this is the "real" Skipper?

Eisboch

snip
.....I now believe that this obviously sick and troubled
individual is the original Dave Mann.

snip


Good. I will wait for a proper apology from you for your whopper of a lie
about me.



I jumped to a hasty conclusion based upon some rather convincing
evidence.
(Past behavior and the coincidental use of an identical and extremely
unusual posting format). Even Smithers noted that he would have
suspected your hand in the matter, but he drew some other conclusions
based upon something he noticed in the header. I should not have
expressed my conclusion, but I did.
I have already apologized for that. That's what I did wrong, so that's
the apology you get. Reaching the conclusion was an error, not a lie,
and in any case I should have kept it to myself, (as I do most of my
opinions about you and your behavior).


Oh boy....
ding ding...round 3!

"Don" White wrote:

Oh boy....ding ding...round 3!

There is a fairy tale told about the princess who kisses a Harry
FROG...a very ugly FROG. In fact, it was so ugly most people believe it
was really a TOAD. The fairy tale explains that once the Princess kisses
certain portions of the TOAD, she herself turns into a TOAD because her
kiss breaks the spell of an evil witch.

So, Don, do you currently resemble the princess or the toad?

Toady - A person who flatters or defers to others for self-serving
reasons; a sycophant.

Lickspittle - A fawning underling; a toady.

--
Skipper

Skipper wrote:
"Don" White wrote:


Oh boy....ding ding...round 3!


There is a fairy tale told about the princess who kisses a Harry
FROG...a very ugly FROG. In fact, it was so ugly most people believe it
was really a TOAD. The fairy tale explains that once the Princess kisses
certain portions of the TOAD, she herself turns into a TOAD because her
kiss breaks the spell of an evil witch.

So, Don, do you currently resemble the princess or the toad?

Toady - A person who flatters or defers to others for self-serving
reasons; a sycophant.

Lickspittle - A fawning underling; a toady.

--
Skipper

How do I contact your nurse Snippy? I'd ask her to remove your
dictionary. You're abusing it!

Why do you keep bringing up Harry?? I was commenting on Chuck's post.