Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill"
wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message . com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
W.T. Hatch wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message .com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Binary Bill, if you hadn't noticed, is oozing into senility. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:41:12 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:
W.T. Hatch wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message e.com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Binary Bill, if you hadn't noticed, is oozing into senility. Sir: Apart from your oft-observed habit of gratuitous insult, you have little way of knowing whether that individual is _compos mentis_ or not. For that matter, those who claim to "know" to a certainty about the credentials of your wife, or of the boats you own or do not own, behave in a fashion equally puerile to yours. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
W.T. Hatch wrote:
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:41:12 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: W.T. Hatch wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message le.com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Binary Bill, if you hadn't noticed, is oozing into senility. Sir: Apart from your oft-observed habit of gratuitous insult, you have little way of knowing whether that individual is _compos mentis_ or not. You haven't been reading Binary Bill's posts closely - not for their content - but for their inconsistent sputtering. For that matter, those who claim to "know" to a certainty about the credentials of your wife, or of the boats you own or do not own, behave in a fashion equally puerile to yours. Naw. I write better. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:54:02 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:
W.T. Hatch wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:41:12 -0400, Harry Krause wrote: W.T. Hatch wrote: On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message gle.com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Binary Bill, if you hadn't noticed, is oozing into senility. Sir: Apart from your oft-observed habit of gratuitous insult, you have little way of knowing whether that individual is _compos mentis_ or not. You haven't been reading Binary Bill's posts closely - not for their content - but for their inconsistent sputtering. For that matter, those who claim to "know" to a certainty about the credentials of your wife, or of the boats you own or do not own, behave in a fashion equally puerile to yours. Naw. I write better. So you have asserted, on more than one occasion. But I seem to recall someone observing here that those who _do_ possess (and use) superior writing skills do not make claims about those same skills, as you do. On the one hand, however, there is something oddly fascinating about the way a certain element here seems obsessed with details of your personal life and possessions--and your willingness to keep them engaged at the cost of the newsgroup. On the other hand, I suspect you are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish between writing that is grammatically and syntactically correct and that which conveys a worthwhile message. If your definition of "good" writing is the former, I think a reasonable person would be hard put to find much fault with yours. If the latter--well, that is another matter altogether. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
W.T. Hatch wrote:
For that matter, those who claim to "know" to a certainty about the credentials of your wife, or of the boats you own or do not own, behave in a fashion equally puerile to yours. Naw. I write better. So you have asserted, on more than one occasion. But I seem to recall someone observing here that those who _do_ possess (and use) superior writing skills do not make claims about those same skills, as you do. So? What's your point? That one of the pack of right-wing buttwipers here took a swipe at me? What else is new? On the one hand, however, there is something oddly fascinating about the way a certain element here seems obsessed with details of your personal life and possessions--and your willingness to keep them engaged at the cost of the newsgroup. It's amazing, isn't it? As for keeping them engaged, I really don't give a crap what they think, say, or do. Even if they think I do. On the other hand, I suspect you are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish between writing that is grammatically and syntactically correct and that which conveys a worthwhile message. Sorry, but I think spelling, grammar and syntax are important when one is trying to express an idea. In the world of words, and that is, after all, what usenet is, eh, the quality of your writing speaks to the quality of your thinking. Way back when, in the Dark Ages, when I was in college, my better professors also said, one way or another, "prove" what you know or what have learned by writing a paper on this, that, or the other. And spelling and grammar counted. If your definition of "good" writing is the former, I think a reasonable person would be hard put to find much fault with yours. If the latter--well, that is another matter altogether. Good writing is good writing. If you want to write like this.... my father moved through dooms of love through sames of am through haves of give, singing each morning out of each night my father moved through depths of height ....then you better be as talented as e.e. cummings. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:36:32 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:
W.T. Hatch wrote: For that matter, those who claim to "know" to a certainty about the credentials of your wife, or of the boats you own or do not own, behave in a fashion equally puerile to yours. Naw. I write better. So you have asserted, on more than one occasion. But I seem to recall someone observing here that those who _do_ possess (and use) superior writing skills do not make claims about those same skills, as you do. So? What's your point? That one of the pack of right-wing buttwipers here took a swipe at me? What else is new? Sir: I thought I was quite clear, but I'll rephrase. You have crowed more than once about possessing superior writing skills. Those who truly _do_ possess such skills do not typically find it necessary to make those claims, preferring instead to allow their work to speak for itself. On the one hand, however, there is something oddly fascinating about the way a certain element here seems obsessed with details of your personal life and possessions--and your willingness to keep them engaged at the cost of the newsgroup. It's amazing, isn't it? As for keeping them engaged, I really don't give a crap what they think, say, or do. Even if they think I do. Ah, but I think you do. There's no crime in that, mind you--but your prolific posting to rec.boats belies your claim. On the other hand, I suspect you are unable (or unwilling) to distinguish between writing that is grammatically and syntactically correct and that which conveys a worthwhile message. Sorry, but I think spelling, grammar and syntax are important when one is trying to express an idea. In the world of words, and that is, after all, what usenet is, eh, the quality of your writing speaks to the quality of your thinking. Way back when, in the Dark Ages, when I was in college, my better professors also said, one way or another, "prove" what you know or what have learned by writing a paper on this, that, or the other. And spelling and grammar counted. I have no quibble with the importance of spelling, grammar and syntax--and I am now somewhat curious as to your apparent lack of reading comprehension. Is this a feigned ingenuousness on your part, I wonder? If your definition of "good" writing is the former, I think a reasonable person would be hard put to find much fault with yours. If the latter--well, that is another matter altogether. Good writing is good writing. If you want to write like this.... Ah...but by your apparent criteria, cummings would not be a good writer. He routinely ignored conventions of grammar, syntax and style. For that matter, even spelling was quite arbitrary for many of the great writers of prose and poetry. In any case, I believe you are trying to conflate mere form with content. Banal sentiments expressed with perfect form are no less banal. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch my father moved through dooms of love through sames of am through haves of give, singing each morning out of each night my father moved through depths of height ...then you better be as talented as e.e. cummings. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Unlike the political whores, I went boating this weekend.
"W.T. Hatch" wrote in message ... On Thu, 08 Jul 2004 19:34:44 GMT, "Calif Bill" wrote: "basskisser" wrote in message . com... "Calif Bill" wrote in message news:GY5Hc.9221 snipped the drivel I take it that you put yourself in the same light as those you call "political whores"? You post and respond as much as anybody. Nope. Rarely, if ever, start a political thread. Sir: Do you believe that _continuing_ an acrimonious "political" thread is somehow different from _starting_ one? Over the past 30 days, here's your tally: out of 127 posts, 98 are participating in some sort of "political" squabble. Most sincerely, W.T. Hatch Yes. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fabulous Boating Weekend | General | |||
Why all the political talk on boating board | General | |||
Can someone help me find the boating website instead of this political site | General | |||
Political, but boating related | General | |||
Unlike the political posters, I went boating. | General |