"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"thunder" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 07:58:31 -0400, Harry Krause wrote:


I've never been able to understand why you righties are so much in
love
with Bush. He's an intellectual mouse, a man of no ideas, a terrible
speaker, he lies constantly; he's a lousy father, a drunk, a cokehead,
he's little more than a figurehead, and he's gotten this country into
more
trouble around the world and put it at more risk than any other
president
in the last 100 years. Yet none of you righties will even acknowledge
he
has serious shortcomings.

Amen. I may not adhere to a conservative social agenda, but a
conservative fiscal policy makes sense to me, but Bush has brought big
government back. Not including security/defense items, spending has
ground an average of over 10% per year, much of it deficit spending.
The
reasons for Iraq keep mutating. Bin Laden is still bin Missin', and the
scandals make Slick Willie's administration look clean. Let's see,
there
is the WMD investigation and the Niger uranium forgeries, Cheney's
Energy
Task Force, the Plame Game, the Medicare Drug Scam ($400 billion becomes
$540 billion and bribes for votes), Halliburton overcharges, the GAO
investigating the White Houses' video news releases, the Chalabi Iran
"spy ring", . . .

Not one of those so-called "scandals" has amounted to a hill of
beans...and
none will.

And the 10% is mostly a result of baseline increases in budgets due to the
dem's 1974 Budget Act.


Where was your outrage when guys like Ron Brown, James McDougal, and and
Vince Foster were dying strange deaths...many times right before they were
scheduled to testify in one of the many Clinton scandal investigations?

What were people saying about moral equivalency a short time ago? On a
scale of moral equivalency, murdering people set to testify against you is
a
lot worse than (how does Gould say it?) "being misinformed" about intel
being passed to you second and third hand.