![]() |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... If that ever happens, please give me advance notice. I'll bring the cinder blocks, chains, and ammo. You're getting more and more like basskisser all the time. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"DSK" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: I don't buy that. History has shown that some of the most brilliant people were very poor speakers. Name two. 1) James Madison 2) Harry Truman 3) William H. Taft 4) Thomas Jefferson IMHO you're assuming this as a corollary to a very obvious fact, that some of the best, most polished, and plausible speakers are not as smart as they sound. Sometimes that's true, and sometimes not. I think the only way to know is to spend time with a person talking one-on-one on a personal level. That's why Bush is so effective when he's meeting with the other World leaders in person. You mean, effective at making other world leaders mistrust & dislike him? He seems to have done a pretty good job schmoozing several World leaders recently...as evidenced by the unanimous UN resolution which Bush was seeking that was passed yesterday. BTW thanks for letting me make this point. Good work, comrade! You're welcome. If you were a poker player you'd be dropping your cards on the floor. Only intentionally...and only a few of them...so that you'd *think* you were getting a good look at my entire hand. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... I think the only way to know is to spend time with a person talking one-on-one on a personal level. That's why Bush is so effective when he's meeting with the other World leaders in person. How do you know he's effective under those circumstances? Been there with him? I can only go on what others who have met him say about him...and that includes many folks who *used* to criticize him. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... ...now referred to as "fluency" by speech pathologists... Are you f-ing kidding me? So a "stuttering oriental" is now a "fluent asian"? |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "DSK" wrote in message ... ... Go look at what some of the 9/11 panel members (including the partisan ben-Veniste) had to say about Bush's performance before their committee. Uh huh. And do you think that GWB went in front of that committee and spoke his mind, with no prep and no rehearsing? There was grumbling among committee members because Bush told them he'd give them just an hour of his time. I translated that to mean that an hour is as much of an attention span as he could muster. So to answer your question: no I don't think Bush is a moron for having misspoke. If it was just misusing a word now and then, I'd agree. But he rambles like a moron and misuses words constantly. He's actually funnier than the people who mimic him... or at least, he would be if it weren't so scary that he is actually the President. Last week, he spewed some nonsense about how if we'd drilled for oil in Alaska in the early to mid 1990s, we wouldn't be in the mess we're in today. That was the best he could come up with as a solution to our oil dependency. That's NPR for you. They conveniently left out where Bush's proposal calls for half of the money derived from oil lease sales in Alaska to be spent on research and development of alternative energy means. January 31, 2003 Bush ties alternative energy research to Arctic drilling money By SCOTT SONNER ASSOCIATED PRESS RENO, Nev. (AP) - President Bush's new budget anticipates $2.4 billion in oil lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge by 2005, with half the money to be spent to research solar, wind, geothermal and other alternative energy, an assistant secretary said Friday. Did the rest of your article mention that 70% of such oil leases have produced nothing over the past 20 years, and that the ones which *do* produce are only providing about 3% of our needs? My point is that your boy needs to come up with a REAL vision, one which doesn't involve wasting time looking for oil. He has no such vision. Did any of the last 4 or 5 Presidents? Clinton had 8 years and we're more reliant on oil today than when he took office. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... ...now referred to as "fluency" by speech pathologists... Are you f-ing kidding me? So a "stuttering oriental" is now a "fluent asian"? Stutterers are now referred to as people with fluency problems. But, you know that, being a doctor & everything, and being well-read on how sometimes dental and medical problems can be intermingled with speech difficulties. Yu reed a lott. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"NOYB" wrote in message link.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... ...now referred to as "fluency" by speech pathologists... Are you f-ing kidding me? So a "stuttering oriental" is now a "fluent asian"? More PC bull****. |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
NOYB wrote:
1) James Madison 2) Harry Truman 3) William H. Taft 4) Thomas Jefferson The only one on this list who was "brilliant" is Jefferson. And I've never read that he was a poor speaker, but rather the contrary. Truman was definitely NOT a poor speaker, else why would his "whistle stop" campaign tour produce such good results? Taft? You gotta be kidding. I have no doubt he was an intelligent man, but "one of the most brilliant"??? And what is the evidence that he was a notably poor speaker? Madison could be considered brilliant if he weren't standing in the same room with either Jefferson or Franklin (or for that matter, Hamilton, or for that matter, Burr). But again, whence comes any intimation that he was a poor speaker? Sorry, Nobby, no cigar. Not even close. DSK |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 20:03:38 +0000, NOYB wrote:
Did any of the last 4 or 5 Presidents? Clinton had 8 years and we're more reliant on oil today than when he took office. If we had followed Carter's initiatives we might now be energy independent. Instead, over the past 25 years we have burned up @25% of the worlds total oil reserves. http://www.faultline.org/news/2001/1...ependence.html |
OT-- Is GWB really a moron or does he just play one on TV?
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 20:03:38 +0000, NOYB wrote: Did any of the last 4 or 5 Presidents? Clinton had 8 years and we're more reliant on oil today than when he took office. If we had followed Carter's initiatives we might now be energy independent. Of course we would. Afterall, bankrupt countires don't need oil and gas. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com