|
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29
year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
|
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jps" wrote in message
... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
Doug Kanter wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
Doug Kanter wrote:
"jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jim--" wrote in message
... Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Does Bush sound educated enough, IN YOUR OPINION, to be a brain surgeon? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message ... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! 1999? How can Bush be blamed for something that happened while Clinton was President? ;-) |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message m... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Quantity never out-trumps quality. Clinton was the master of the trailer park tramp. Just reaching out to his base, I guess. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message . com... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. NOT similar, you ignorant ass. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
jim-- wrote:
"P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message t.com... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"NOYB" wrote in message
link.net... "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! 1999? How can Bush be blamed for something that happened while Clinton was President? ;-) What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary. MY 15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to know something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's wrong with you, NOYB? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message t.com... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message . com... In article .net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. NOT similar, you ignorant ass. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. Hey dummy, and Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message net.com... In article ink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school. Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual accomplishment. No original research is needed. Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it. It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's certainly in the top two. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jim--" wrote in message
... NOT similar, you ignorant ass. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. Hey dummy, and Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. I don't know why I'm bothering to ask, but if you knew nothing of the backgrounds of either man and you met them both at a party, which would you guess was the Rhodes scholar? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
|
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message net.com... In article ink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school. Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual accomplishment. No original research is needed. Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it. It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's certainly in the top two. You are a joke. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
jim-- wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message eanet.com... In article hlink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections, not because of smarts...remember, he was turned down by a third-rate texas law school. Frither, an MBA, even from Harvard, is not much of an intellectual accomplishment. No original research is needed. Bush is as dumb as a post. Every time he opens his mouth, he proves it. It must mean something to you to try to make him sound bright, but he isn't. If he isn't the dumbest POTUS in our nation's history, he's certainly in the top two. You are a joke. Perhaps, but the real joke is Bush. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
|
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary. MY 15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to know something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's wrong with you, NOYB? Using Republican doublespeak, Nobby's from the party of personal responsibility, remember? jps Right. I forgot. The foreign minister of Slovenia should've sent Bush some sort of study guide about the country before he arrived for his visit. "Europe for Dummies", or something like that. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net...
Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The poll says nothing of what percentage of those polled were either Republican, or Democrat. Are you too stupid to understand ANYTHING? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
Doug Kanter wrote:
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... What the difference? Bush was the one visited by the foreign dignitary. MY 15 YR OLD SON would realize that the correct thing to do would be to know something about the person's country, fer chrissake. What the hell's wrong with you, NOYB? Using Republican doublespeak, Nobby's from the party of personal responsibility, remember? jps Right. I forgot. The foreign minister of Slovenia should've sent Bush some sort of study guide about the country before he arrived for his visit. "Europe for Dummies", or something like that. He's just another of the Rationalizers for Bush. No matter how badly Bush screws up, no matter what his lies, the RepubliBORG Rationalizers have an excuse handy. They've convinced each other of his infallibility. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message net.com... In article ink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message eanet.com... In article hlink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. Clinton was selected as a Rhodes Scholar because of his smarts. Bush got into Harvard Business School because of, mainly, his grandfather, and then his father. That's what was being discussed here. Brainpower. Clinton has it; Bush does not. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
|
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... NOT similar, you ignorant ass. Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. Hey dummy, and Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. I don't know why I'm bothering to ask, but if you knew nothing of the backgrounds of either man and you met them both at a party, which would you guess was the Rhodes scholar? Probably not the one hitting on the fat chicks. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net... So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. So? He could've gone to almost any 4 year college and achieved the same thing. Why do you suppose he chose Oxford? Better food? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"jps" wrote in message ... In article , says... Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Yes, as a Rhodes Scholar. Rhodes Scholars did not qualify for deferment through 2-S status when Clinton attended Oxford. He should have been 1-A. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"basskisser" wrote in message om... "NOYB" wrote in message hlink.net... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The poll says nothing of what percentage of those polled were either Republican, or Democrat. That's a good point. If it were *all* Democrats, the number would have been much higher than 53%. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... http://www.slovensko.com/slovakia.faq/edre/2 So??? Your boy's not watching this newsgroup. |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. So? He could've gone to almost any 4 year college and achieved the same thing. Why do you suppose he chose Oxford? Better food? Because of the CIA's long history of recruiting its assets at Oxford? http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/8425/CLIN-CIA.HTM |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message .. . "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message net.com... In article ink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. And lying his ass off to get the scholarship....based on the criteria Mr. Rhodes' Will contains four criteria by which prospective Rhodes Scholars are to be selected: 1.. literary and scholastic attainments; 2.. energy to use one's talents to the full, as exemplified by fondness for and success in sports; 3.. truth, courage, devotion to duty, sympathy for and protection of the weak, kindliness, unselfishness and fellowship; 4.. moral force of character and instincts to lead, and to take an interest in one's fellow beings. The Rhodes is more about being P.C than actual scholarship |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
NOYB wrote:
Rhodes Scholars did not qualify for deferment through 2-S status when Clinton attended Oxford. He should have been 1-A. So should Dick Cheney. DSK |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
P.Fritz wrote:
"NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message . .. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:MPG.1b2e31f1ecabf3259898ea@news. seanet.com... In article thlink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. And lying his ass off to get the scholarship....based on the criteria Mr. Rhodes' Will contains four criteria by which prospective Rhodes Scholars are to be selected: 1.. literary and scholastic attainments; 2.. energy to use one's talents to the full, as exemplified by fondness for and success in sports; 3.. truth, courage, devotion to duty, sympathy for and protection of the weak, kindliness, unselfishness and fellowship; 4.. moral force of character and instincts to lead, and to take an interest in one's fellow beings. The Rhodes is more about being P.C than actual scholarship Seems as if yo uwould not qualify on any of those conditions enumerated, eh? |
OT--why the 18-29 year olds support Kerry
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... P.Fritz wrote: "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... jim-- wrote: "P.Fritz" wrote in message ... "jim--" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jim--" wrote in message . .. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: "jps" wrote in message news:MPG.1b2e31f1ecabf3259898ea@news. seanet.com... In article thlink.net, says... Awhile ago, Harry posted the results of a poll which showed that the 18-29 year old age group supports Kerry. I think we've found the answer "why": "A new Gallup poll says that 53 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 do not know who the USA fought in Europe during World War II." Democrats. The party for the uninformed. The leader of your party is less informed than many high school seniors and clearly demonstrates a lack of historical context when sending our kids across the globe to fight and die for his ideological whims. Republicans worship the uninformed because "he's a regular guy like me." So which is worse, an uninformed electorate or an uniformed President? Duh. They support Kerry because they don't know who we fought in WWII. OK. Got it. And, the tail light on my trailer went bad because I ran out of baking powder and forgot to put it on the shopping list. I'd think the uneducated would cleave unto a president who, while standing next to the prime minister of one country, said he was from a different one. Or a president who, if you spun a globe with the names of the various countries removed, and asked if he could point out the locations of, say, 20 countries...couldn't. Just your opinion....certainly not fact though. "The only thing I know about Slovakia is what I learned first-hand from your foreign minister, who came to Texas."-To a Slovak journalist as quoted by Knight Ridder News Service, June 22, 1999. Bush's meeting was with Janez Drnovsek, the prime minister of Slovenia. ROFL!!!!!!!! Do you suppose your moron could've mustered the brain power to prepare for a state visit and know something his guest's country, or at the very least, know that the person he spent time with was the head honcho? Until he was appointed POTUS, Bush was probably the least traveled president of the 20th or 21st Century. He hadn't been anywhere outside the US except Mexico, I think, and that was only to get drunk and laid. Similar to Clintons experience prior to becoming POTUS. Clinton probably has the edge on blowjobs and getting laid though. Remeber that clinton dodged the draft by going to England.(back when avoiding going to veitnam was admirable)....and managed a war protest trip to Moscow at the same time Lucky for him...finding England and Russia on a map would have been difficult for him otherwise. ;-) Once again, d.f., Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar. And Bush was a Yale grad with an MBA. So? Bush got into Harvard because of connections So? Clinton went to Oxford and received draft deferments because of connections to influential people including a judge, the head of his local draft board, and a US senator. And lying his ass off to get the scholarship....based on the criteria Mr. Rhodes' Will contains four criteria by which prospective Rhodes Scholars are to be selected: 1.. literary and scholastic attainments; 2.. energy to use one's talents to the full, as exemplified by fondness for and success in sports; 3.. truth, courage, devotion to duty, sympathy for and protection of the weak, kindliness, unselfishness and fellowship; 4.. moral force of character and instincts to lead, and to take an interest in one's fellow beings. The Rhodes is more about being P.C than actual scholarship Seems as if yo uwould not qualify on any of those conditions enumerated, eh? What a good argument Harry. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com