Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 12:37:44 -0700, Curtis CCR wrote:


Agreed. I am still asking, "Indictments for what?"


Potentially the Espionage Act, perjury, obstruction of justice, and
conspiracy, that's just of the top of a non-lawyer's head. I'm sure a
prosecutor of Fitzgerald's caliber can think of a few more. This
investigation has been going on for close to two years, that doesn't
happen unless charges are expected. Oh, unless your name is Kenneth Starr.
  #32   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Well, I'll say he's guilty; he's another right-wing chickenhawk scumball
bushie that should have been brought up for his tactics long ago.


Capt. jeff


Thank YOU Jeff!

Now we return to our regularly schedualed programming.....

  #33   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

10. Sep 28, 3:48 pm show options

Newsgroups: rec.boats
From: - Find messages by this author
Date: 28 Sep 2005 13:48:12 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 28 2005 3:48 pm
Subject: Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Bert Robbins wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
News Flash...



Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!



Jim



I thought the US legal system was based upon the principle that you are
innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?



Isn't their the thought that any prosecutor worth their pay could get an
indictment of a ham sandwich?



This indictment will not stand the light of day.



That's odd. The right wingers here constantly find politicians
instantly guilty of crimes that haven't been given due process.



What was Ted Kennedy found guilty of in the death of Mary Jo?



Found guilty of having enough power and money to walk free.



Idiot.

Guzzi-boy.

  #34   Report Post  
*JimH*
 
Posts: n/a
Default


wrote in message
oups.com...
10. Sep 28, 3:48 pm show options

Newsgroups: rec.boats
From: - Find messages by this author
Date: 28 Sep 2005 13:48:12 -0700
Local: Wed, Sep 28 2005 3:48 pm
Subject: Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse




- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...


Bert Robbins wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
News Flash...



Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!



Jim



I thought the US legal system was based upon the principle that you
are
innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?



Isn't their the thought that any prosecutor worth their pay could get
an
indictment of a ham sandwich?



This indictment will not stand the light of day.



That's odd. The right wingers here constantly find politicians
instantly guilty of crimes that haven't been given due process.



What was Ted Kennedy found guilty of in the death of Mary Jo?



Found guilty of having enough power and money to walk free.



Idiot.

Guzzi-boy.


Kevin?


  #35   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
News Flash...

Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!

Jim


I thought the US legal system was based upon the principle that you
are
innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?

Isn't their the thought that any prosecutor worth their pay could get
an
indictment of a ham sandwich?

This indictment will not stand the light of day.


That's odd. The right wingers here constantly find politicians
instantly guilty of crimes that haven't been given due process.

What was Ted Kennedy found guilty of in the death of Mary Jo?


Found guilty of having enough power and money to walk free.



Idiot.


No, you are the idiot. He walked because of money and power.


Idiot.



  #36   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
News Flash...

Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!

Jim


I thought the US legal system was based upon the principle that you
are
innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?

Isn't their the thought that any prosecutor worth their pay could get
an
indictment of a ham sandwich?

This indictment will not stand the light of day.


That's odd. The right wingers here constantly find politicians
instantly guilty of crimes that haven't been given due process.

What was Ted Kennedy found guilty of in the death of Mary Jo?


Found guilty of having enough power and money to walk free.



Idiot.


No, you are the idiot. He walked because of money and power.


You dumb ****, he was CONVICTED of leaving the scene of an accident. If
he "walked because of money and power", I take it by that you think he
should have been convicted of murder, correct? IF the court system in
the U.S. is that corrupt, do you not think that it would be even easier
to do away with the leaving the scene of an accident charge???

  #37   Report Post  
ed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You might want to rethink that statement, which is a lesser charge walking
away or murder? Money DOES Talk.
wrote in message
ups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Bill McKee wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

Bert Robbins wrote:
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...
News Flash...

Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!

Jim


I thought the US legal system was based upon the principle that you
are
innocent until proven guilty in a court of law?

Isn't their the thought that any prosecutor worth their pay could
get
an
indictment of a ham sandwich?

This indictment will not stand the light of day.


That's odd. The right wingers here constantly find politicians
instantly guilty of crimes that haven't been given due process.

What was Ted Kennedy found guilty of in the death of Mary Jo?


Found guilty of having enough power and money to walk free.


Idiot.


No, you are the idiot. He walked because of money and power.


You dumb ****, he was CONVICTED of leaving the scene of an accident. If
he "walked because of money and power", I take it by that you think he
should have been convicted of murder, correct? IF the court system in
the U.S. is that corrupt, do you not think that it would be even easier
to do away with the leaving the scene of an accident charge???



  #38   Report Post  
Jeff Rigby
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim Carter wrote:
News Flash...

Delay has been charged with criminal conspiracy!!!!!!

Jim





What a delight.

Of course, the right-wing trash said he'd never be delighted. Now I am
sure they will say he will never be convicted.


Does that make me "right wing trash" if I also believe that he won't be
convicted. There was a loophole in the Texas law that Delay and co. took
advantage. IF it's a loophole it's not illegal just irregular to unethical.
That's politics, just as this charge is politics because Earl knows that he
can't get a conviction. Is that also unethical????


  #39   Report Post  
Jeff Rigby
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tamaroak" wrote in message
...
Well, I'll say he's guilty; he's another right-wing chickenhawk scumball
bushie that should have been brought up for his tactics long ago.

Capt. jeff


So what methods would you employ if you were in a state that was totally
owned by one party (democrat). Everything was stacked against you and even
people of the opposite party that thought like you were being persecuted by
the "machine". I've said this over and over, our government can not work if
one party holds the reigns of power too tightly.

Personally I think that the system is NOW working. While I won't enjoy
Delay being on the carpet I think that opposition is working as there is now
a two party system, at least at the state level.


  #40   Report Post  
thunder
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 08:47:50 -0400, Jeff Rigby wrote:


Does that make me "right wing trash" if I also believe that he won't be
convicted. There was a loophole in the Texas law that Delay and co. took
advantage. IF it's a loophole it's not illegal just irregular to
unethical. That's politics, just as this charge is politics because Earl
knows that he can't get a conviction. Is that also unethical????


Consider it may only be Round 1. DeLay is also likely to be investigated
in regards to the Abramoff probe. That's Federal.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Delay the king of crooks NOYB General 1 April 20th 05 03:40 AM
DeLay Pulled Plug on His Own Father... Jim, General 1 March 28th 05 08:19 PM
( OT ) DeLay establishes charity to court political donors Jim General 0 March 12th 04 08:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017