When would you board someone else's boat??
 

Doug Kanter wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Don White wrote:

Henry Blackmoore wrote in message news:svUhc.5070


I also own an Australian Cattle dog.


Is her name Karen Smith?


ROFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!





Not ROFL, silly....

WOOF

When to shoot a falre into someone elses bilge WAS: When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...


Doug Kanter wrote:

If you were faced with the hypothetical muffler situation I described,
and
you could predict no end to it, you would put a stop to it in any way
you
could before you'd let the neighbor drive you mad from sleep
deprivation.

Not everyone approaches problems the way you describe yourself doing.
It's easy to say there is no way to solve a situation so that then you
can take justice into your own hands.

Justice? Here's the solution to the muffler problem, since you don't seem to
have the energy or the mental capacity to work it out: Call the cops and
explain that the noise ordinances are being violated. The cops, being
stupid, will show up when the act is not being committed. They will tell you
they heard nothing. Repeat the calls to the cops 10 more times. They will
repeat their assertion that they observed no violation. Now, call your local
town justice. Explain that the cops were too busy eating donuts. Explain
also that you told the cops the violation took place every weeknight between
3:15 and 3:30 AM, and that the cops couldn't manage to show up in that 15
minute timespan. The town justice will issue instruct the cops to arrest the
neighbor. If the cops do not arrest the neighbor, they will be in contempt
of court. The neighbor will be taken away in handcuffs and put in a cell for
between 2 and 48 hours, depending on how stupid he is. He will have time to
think about what an asshole he's been. You will never have a problem with
him again. End of story.

Do you need this explained any further?



Do I like his dog coming over here? No, but this solution is acceptable.
I'm happy, the neighbor is happy, and his dog is happy (I presume). I'm
not sitting here with smoke coming out of my ears dreaming up revenge so
I can feel smug about seeing some jerk get what's coming to them.

I have no time for such nonsense. If you're happy with that solution, good
for you. If it were me, I'd invite the neighbor over, shove his face in the
pile of poop, and explain to him that he should review his will at least
every few months to be sure it's up to date, if he intends to continue his
antisocial behavior.

I don't expect you to understand this. I grew up in Queens. Who the hell
knows where you grew up.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Don" wrote in message
...
"Charles" wrote
Doug Kanter wrote:
"basskisser" wrote
Why not lighten up a little, and listen to the music until the
people
got
back?

Because inconsiderate people make a habit of leaving behind piles of
****
for others to deal with. The behavior should be crushed instantly
and
in
the
most horrifying, shocking and insulting ways.

You're a ticking time bomb.

You say that as if it's a bad thing.



Place mug in CD-ROM drawer. Press CTRL-B for a cold beer, Don.

:-)

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Charles" wrote
In many threads you have advocated violent actions against people or
animals you believe to have violated your personal space or rights.

What would your solution be to those things?

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
What about YOUR "personal responsibility" to assist other boaters in an
emergency if you can?

How did you transmute *your* into *others*?
Do you even know what personal responsibility means?

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open yourself up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
ink.net...
In article , "Doug Kanter"
wrote:

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote in message
link.net...

Anybody that would advocate violent action against helpless and
innocent
animals is one sick puppy.

Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for
a
damaged tomato plant?

I repeat. You are one sick puppy.

Actually, Henry, a garden *does* fall under that definition. These laws
were
almost eliminated as farms began to vanish, but in many places, they were
kept intact because of the victory garden movement during World War II.
The
current legal argument is that flowers have no intrinsic value unless
they're raised by a commercial grower. But, food *does* have value to
anyone
who grows it. Therefore, any food garden is defined as a farm.

Sorry to burst your bubble.....

Doug,
You don't have to go defensive over erroneous claims.
Henry has no more say over your property than you do over his.
Just smear his nose in his own **** and move on.

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
Show me where the laws in a suburban area in this country have been
interpreted to allow a homeowner to hide under the guise of growing "food
crops" while killing his neighbors dog or cats? Garden be damned.

The *law* says that if you touch my stuff, I am required to shoot your
stupid ass in the face. Get it?

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

Don,
I am having a hard time following this conversation, but from what I can
tell you are saying that a dog taking a crap on your lawn is the same as
being a child molester. Did I miss something?


"Don" wrote in message
...
"Henry Blackmoore" wrote
"Doug Kanter" wrote:
Actually, it's legally permitted, performed and tested in the courts on
a
fairly regular basis. In many places, including what you'd consider
"normal
suburbs", animals which damage food crops may be killed as long as the
method does not endanger neighbors or violate weapons laws. You really
ought
to think before you hurl, boy.

Uh-huh. And you think that somebody's garden comes under the "food
crop"
definition and that you have the right to kill your neighbor's pets for
a
damaged tomato plant?

Can I come into your house and eat all your food, drink all your beer,
fondle your 13 yo daughters nubbins, issue you a matched pair of knuckle
sandwiches and take your DVD player on the way out the door?
If you choose to use MY personal property for YOUR use, YOU open yourself
up
to that same behavior.
Doesn't anyone know how to *think* anymore?

When would you board someone else's boat??
 

"Charles" wrote in message
...
"Charles" wrote

Keep back-pedalling though.

Keep back-pedalling. It might be helpful in backing away from that line.

Is that a macro?