Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:29:03 GMT, Red Cloudİ
wrote: On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:21:05 -0400, HarryKrause wrote: *JimH* wrote: "John H" wrote in message news ![]() On Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:10:43 -0400, HarryKrause wrote: *JimH* wrote: And how absolutely hilarious. Using radar to track birds to find fish. Yeah....right Krause. Do you also use it to track those logs you spoke of? LOL. I wonder how he will explain how his *radar* shows water depths. It may be "hilarious{" to you, but it is s.o.p. for many sportfishermen. I never said my radar showed water depth, or even implied that. *You," in your drooling idiocy, leaped to that conclusion, I pointed out you were wrong, as did SWS, and you just press on regardless. The world is safer because you are boatless. " Radar showed the birds really were active, in and over about 40 feet of water, ..." Seeing birds on radar. Seeing water depths on radar. Hilarious. Let's try to break this down for you into a few (but not all) possibilities: You have a radar set. You have a chartplotter. Your radar images can be superimposed over your chartplotter images. Your charterplotter's "map" shows depths or marked contour curves or both. Got the picture? You have a radar set. You have a chartplotter. They are separate instruments. You are familiar enough with the capabilities of your radar set to guesstimate how far away the birds are...and when you look at your chartplotter, you see the depths or marked contour curves or both. Got the picture? You have a radar set. You are really familiar with your area, so when the set says "birds," you know by looking at the monitor where the area is, and you know the water depth there is 10-12 feet at low tide, or whatever. Got the picture? There are more possibilities, but I don't want you to fry your brain. Since you are NOT a boater, and never were a serious fishermen, you ought not to make comments that so clearly show you don't know your butt from a hole in the ground, eh? A boat is "a hole in the water", not "a hole in the ground". A hole in the water would be a vortex. Boats float on water. At best you could say that a boat creates a temporary dimple on the surface of the water like, say a gravity well does in space. But hey, one old saw is as good as another. :) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WooooHoooo! | ASA | |||
A Dickens Christmas | General | |||
Good weekend, except for one little cover problem. | General | |||
Bumpers | General |