Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:
John H wrote: The post to which you responded had absolutely nothing to do with rules of engagement. Other than being about 'rules of engagement' and alleged violations of same, yeah. Before you jump and call names, read the posts, if you please. I'm not calling names, just stating facts. And your posts have become just more predictable boring fact-free BushCo cheerleading. At this point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts. DSK Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts. I don't recall ever 'cheerleading'. I may have pointed out just how fallacious some of the anti-Bush tripe is, but that's not cheerleading. When someone says that American soldiers purposely target innocent women and children and villages for bombing in Iraq, I will present my feelings on the subject. If you call this cheerleading, then I assume that you consider any post which is not 'anti-Bush' a cheerleading post. John H On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The real Clinton versus Bush Iraq debacle | General | |||
OT--U.N. Unanimously Adopts Iraq Resolution | General |