Thread: OT on IRAQ
View Single Post
  #47   Report Post  
John H
 
Posts: n/a
Default OT on IRAQ

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:20:36 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:

Actually, refuting the *arguments* presented by some of the folks on
the NG has nothing to do with my politics. Much of the bull**** posted
is simply that.


And the fact that you don't "refute" anything, but simply argue tirelessly and
sieze on any excuse or outright lie is 1- why you are a cheerleader and 2- why I
say you are clueless. Your current discussion with Doug Kanter on environmental
policy is a case in point.

Or the Iraq situation... you started out saying you "had reservations" and ended
up thumping the tub for Bush, capping it all with saying our troops should not
follow any rules of engagement or the Geneva Conventions. Yeah, let's just kill
any random Iraqi, or better yet all of 'em... brilliant military policy....
which is why I called you a pin head.


Nevertheless, kill files are easy to use, the author is "John H". Go
for it.


I don't kill file anybody. I just don't read posts I'm not interested in.... by
subject or author.

Bye now. I'm going to try and increase my percentage of boating related posts
here.

Doug King


I said that our troops shouldn't follow rules of engagement? Show me!
I commented that showing Saddam on TV was not high on my list of
bothersome things (or words to that effect). I also said I didn't give
a rats ass, a phrase which had just been used by NOYB. The fact that
we had both used that phrase prompted my 'great minds' comment.

If you'll recall, I was arguing a statement alleging that American
soldiers had targetted and killed innocent civilians. I've probably
had more experience with rules of engagement than most folks here.

John H

On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!