John H wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:41 -0500, DSK wrote:

John H wrote:
The post to which you responded had absolutely nothing to do with
rules of engagement.

Other than being about 'rules of engagement' and alleged violations of
same, yeah.



Before you jump and call names, read the posts, if you please.

I'm not calling names, just stating facts. And your posts have become
just more predictable boring fact-free BushCo cheerleading. At this
point I read very few of yours or Nobby's posts.

DSK

Please point to some (or one) of my cheerleading posts. I don't recall
ever 'cheerleading'. I may have pointed out just how fallacious some
of the anti-Bush tripe is, but that's not cheerleading.

When someone says that American soldiers purposely target innocent
women and children and villages for bombing in Iraq, I will present my
feelings on the subject. If you call this cheerleading, then I assume
that you consider any post which is not 'anti-Bush' a cheerleading
post.

John H


Do you ever have anything other than simple-minded thoughts, John?