Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:
"BCITORGB" wrote in message oups.com... Scott demonstrates that he's never spent any time in a school classroom as an adult: ==================== And mainstreaming also places an undue and, at times, unfair burden on teachers and classmates. Only if you believe that providing a proper educational and social environment for someone who is already facing an enormous uphill battle just to survive is an "undue burden." Most people, and certainly most socialist egalitarianists, believe that helping the disabled is not an "undue burden" but is rather a mitzvah and a gift, and an opportunity to show charity and love and empathy and concern for those less fortunate, and a teachable moment particularly for children (as well as ignorant, bigoted adults) wherein the intrinsic value of every human being can be demonstrated and the rewards of altruistic service to others taught to impressionable youth. ==================== Scott, if you're trying to teach a lesson in arithmetic to a class of Grade 3 pupils and are repeatedly disrupted by random vocal and physical outbursts the, yes, that's an undue burden. A burden on the teachers and the majority of the pupils, who, I might add, also have a right to an education individualized so as to maximize THEIR learning. You pose an interesting dilemma. You veer away from the line taken by most right-wing critics of the educational system. Most such critics make the case that far too much time is taken up with mamby-pamby, soft stuff like socialization, and that not enough hard-core maths, science, reading et al are taught. So, we need to decide, during math class, should the primary focus be on the teaching of maths or should we repeatedly take time out for "socializing" whenever we get a random, irrelevant outburst? I'm sympathetic to the socialization argument. To a point. Once the socialzation becomes an undue burden to the teachers and other pupils (when their freedoms are being violated), then, I think, we've had enough. frtzw908 If I may, rather than focusing on the "burden on the teacher angle" let's look at who it is for...students. If you are teaching Grade 6 math so that students will be prepared for Grade 7 math, but you have 3 students with intellectual disabilities in the class for "mainstreaming" purposes who are still at a Grade 1 math level and trying to get to Grade 2, who is it that the teacher is going to appropriately serve all of those needs? Hire another teacher or put the disabled students in a Grade 1 math class. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General |