On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead. You are still posting nothing but lies and
bull**** and still wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the
ass.

Nope, not for hospitalization or surgery.

Bull**** again. Not all medical care is covered by government
health care and you _can_ buy insurance for the rest. I live here
and I have such coverage. You haven't got a clue what you're
talking about, as usual.

Funny, a credible AP reporter says Canadians are prohibited from buying
outside insurance for hospitalization and surgery.

Yer credible AP reporter is wrong. Tough ****.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 21-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Take a pill, your blood pressure is spiking...

**** off, dickhead. You are still posting nothing but lies and
bull**** and still wouldn't know a fact if it bit you in the
ass.

How erudite. How scholarly. How persuasive. Not.


Nope, not for hospitalization or surgery.

Bull**** again. Not all medical care is covered by government
health care and you _can_ buy insurance for the rest. I live here
and I have such coverage. You haven't got a clue what you're
talking about, as usual.

Funny, a credible AP reporter says Canadians are prohibited from buying
outside insurance for hospitalization and surgery.

Yer credible AP reporter is wrong. Tough ****.

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 22-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

Because I actually have the insurance you claim is illegal
and impossible to get.

You claim to be a journalist and editor and you don't have
any concern for the truth. Perhaps the AP writer went
to the same school of dickhead journalism that you did.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:


On 22-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

And we should take YOUR word for it because....???

Because I actually have the insurance you claim is illegal
and impossible to get.

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.


You claim to be a journalist and editor and you don't have
any concern for the truth.

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity. It's not
"journalism." This is a debate where I'm free to assert anything I like.
It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

Perhaps the AP writer went
to the same school of dickhead journalism that you did.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times. However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't. You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

Mike

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

I'll stick with the published report, I find it credible. If you disagree,
feel free to refute it.


This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times.

Well, you'd like to think so, certainly...the truth, however, may be
somewhat less accommodating to you.

However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Nah. It's up to you to refute them. I've got the AP on my side, which will
do just fine till you come up with some credible refutation.


Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't.

Do you? I'm not so sure. Moreover, it's entirely likely you're lying.

You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

So, does it cover hospitalization and/or surgery in a Canadian hospital?

--
Regards,
Scott Weiser

"I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on
friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM

© 2005 Scott Weiser

in article , Scott Weiser at
wrote on 3/24/05 6:20 PM:

A Usenet persona calling itself Michael Daly wrote:

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

I'll stick with the published report, I find it credible. If you disagree,
feel free to refute it.

You are making a total fool of yourself with this. More than usual! LOL.

On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

I find it credible

Given your track record for believing in bull****, that means
nothing.

I've long since lost count of the number of times you are willing
to make a claim that you refuse to back up. Your credibility = 0.

Well, you'd like to think so, certainly...the truth, however, may be
somewhat less accommodating to you.

Prove it - I've challenged you on this stuff many times and you still
remain incapable or to scared to even attempt it.

Nah. It's up to you to refute them.

I've never heard of such a law. How do I prove something that
doesn't exist? Your claim - your burden of proof, coward.

Moreover, it's entirely likely you're lying.

Prove it.

So, does it cover hospitalization and/or surgery in a Canadian hospital?

Yes, dickhead, I've already said that it does.

Mike

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it would
appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times. However, it remains up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back it up.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know what your
policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't. You've never let your ignorance prevent you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking bull****, as usual.

Mike

Another lie by Scottie-poo debunked:
http://www.insurance-canada.ca/consp...pplemental.php

Mark

"bearsbuddy" wrote in message
. ..

"Michael Daly" wrote in message
...
On 24-Mar-2005, Scott Weiser wrote:

Does it insure you for hospitalization and surgery? If so, it
would appear
to be illegal under Canadian law.

Really? How about identifying the specific bill and section
of the bill
that states what the law is so that we can verify?

This is the Usenet, where truth is a particularly rare
commodity.

Well, from you sertainly.

It's up to you to prove me wrong if you can.

I've proved you wrong many, many times. However, it remains
up
to you to prove your assertions - you make a claim, you back
it up.

Or perhaps you're lying, or are merely too stupid to know
what your policy
actually covers.

I know - you don't. You've never let your ignorance prevent
you from
posting bull****. I know what the policy covers, since I've
had
to make claims against it in the past. You're talking
bull****, as usual.

Mike

Another lie by Scottie-poo debunked:
http://www.insurance-canada.ca/consp...pplemental.php

Mark
=======================
LOL I think you should read it before you post it. He never
said that there was 'no' supplimental insurance, just what it
coves. Guess you missed that part, eh?

Here's the first clue, irst line...
"..Many residents of any given province in Canada choose to
purchase health insurance for medical services which are not
provided by the provincial health plan..."

Having the insuance isn't going to get you the required hospital
treatment if it's covered, in due time, by the health Canada
system.