Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
JohnH
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:17:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

K. Smith wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:

prodigal1 wrote:

K. Smith wrote:

baa ram ewe
baa ram ewe
only to Bush will we be true
baa ram ewe

you have nothing of interest or thoughtfulness to say
keep posting though
I'll keep an eye on you out of morbid curiosity




Morbid is the correct word to describe our Miss Karen Smith of
Australia. She used to work as a fluffer in a coin-op porn theater,
but her age, stench, and open sores got to be too much for the
management.


Uuuummmm errrr is this a denial of lying Krause or yet another
example of your racism, sexism???

K



Racism? I have no idea what your "race" is, Smith. I made no reference
to your race. What difference does your race make?

Perhaps you're confused by the word "fluffer." The word refers to an
occupation, not a race.

You really are Tuuuuu,,,,,k's mama, figuratively, anyway, eh?


Harry, you really don't know much about anyone in the group. Yet you
act as though you know it all. You must just be a liar.

John H

On the 'PocoLoco' out of Deale, MD,
on the beautiful Chesapeake Bay!

"Divide each difficulty into as many parts as is feasible and necessary to resolve it."
Rene Descartes
  #52   Report Post  
LaBomba182
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Subject: The thought police are coming forCRUISERS!
From: "MMC"


Jim,
The BS law that's the subject of this thread makes no more sense than when
the US was making threatening noises towards countries conducting business
and allowing travel to Cuba. It has absolutely nothing to do with security.
From following your posts, I can see that you really don't understand the
actual reason behind this law. It's the very loud Cuban-American voting
block and the fact that the rest of the country doesn't care enough to get
the 40 year old (failed) embargo lifted.
We're now "pals" with both Russia (which has sent us all their worst
criminals) and China (who has almost done away with US made goods); yet we
still have a hard on for Cuba? Give me a break.
There's a saying, "Unless you're the lead sheep, the view is always the
same".
MMC


Bingo!!!! We have a winner!!

At least someone gets it.

Capt. Bill
  #53   Report Post  
Larry Demers
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Because it subverts my rights under the law, to be assumed innocent until
found otherwise. You whiz bang lawyer, you.
Even then, what is possibly accomplished by keeping the ban on visiting Cuba?
We may need pointers on how to live on zero income some day soon if 'ol dubyah'
stays the course, and they might be a good resource!

Larry D.


JimH wrote:

"Marley" wrote in message
...
Proclamation Restricts Rights of Boats in US Waters

A Proclamation made by US President George W. Bush on February 26, 2004,
authorizes the Secretary of Homeland Security to take virtually total
control over any vessel, foreign or domestic, in the territorial waters of
the United States, if the authorities feel that vessel "may be used, or is
susceptible of being used, for voyage into Cuban territorial waters".


You have a problem with that? Why?


  #54   Report Post  
Larry Demers
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Who Knows? Nobody will investigate it.
Try yourself; Try to prove that anyone did it, and name them please.
Provide proof of your accusations too. They were Arabs you say? Really?
Prove it.

That is what is still missing here. 911 has NOT been solved. There is
plenty more to know before anyone can make accusations. Osama was the
named triggerman, but why aren't we even looking for him? We let him go in
Tora Bora, so that the war against "terror" (what terror?) could continue
to Iraq/Iran/Syria. Lies, lies, lies.

Disgusted



prodigal1 wrote:

Internationally Acclaimed Education theorist and current Prof. Irwin
Corey Chair at the University of Alice Springs, K. Smith wrote:

You really should grow up a bit, this genuinely is a winner takes
all war, the reason you don't fully understand is that your admin has
successfully protected you from further attacks since 911.


Do grace us with yet more of your wisdom Oh esteemed one. Who did
attack the bldgs in New York and Washington?


  #55   Report Post  
Short Wave Sportfishing
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:45 -0600, Larry Demers
wrote:

~~ snippage ~~

Osama was the named triggerman, but why aren't we even looking for him?


Really? That time I knew, he was running the Xtra Mart in Dudley, MA.

Or maybe that's a different Osama.

Later,

Tom



  #56   Report Post  
Jack Goff
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Harry Krause" wrote:
Short Wave Sportfishing wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:05:45 -0600, Larry Demers
wrote:
Osama was the named triggerman, but why aren't we even looking for him?



Really? That time I knew, he was running the Xtra Mart in Dudley, MA.

Or maybe that's a different Osama.


Different fella. "The" Osama is vacationing in Crawford, Texas, along
with his Saudi buddies, at the Bush Ersatz Ranch. Dubya thinks Osama is
the center on a Saudi basketball team.


You mean he's not? Damn liberal media... more lies!!



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Dickens Christmas Harry Krause General 0 December 25th 03 11:30 AM
GRETTIR'S SAGA (continued) Nik ASA 0 September 19th 03 10:12 PM
Just when you thought it was safe . . .. Michael ASA 6 June 27th 03 06:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017