Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lloyd Sumpter wrote in message .. .
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 23:36:32 -0800, Matt Lang wrote: Again "all" the oil in a 2 stroke (by your graph the same or more than a 4 stroke) still goes somewhere, either burnt or out the exhaust as raw oil, I accept what you say about oily rags etc but we're talking the entirety of the oil, not just sundry cleanup wipes. Yes correct. This point was not looked at in my comaprison and was not intended to be looked at. It is a very important and valid point though. Someone needs to create an eco balance to see whats worse in the end. If 4 stroke oil is recycled then thats best. If its done like some people I know do by not recycling or just recycling the oil but not the filter and rags then it maybe worse than the 2 stroke just burning it up. This is the Major Issue with me, and why I went 4-stoke. I can recycle the crankcase oil when I change it, not spew it out into my favourite pristine lake. Also, my "ultralight" Merc 9.9 uses just under 1 litre of oil in the crankcase. Lloyd Sumpter "The Tin Boat" Mirrocraft 12 Yes thats a point. However apparently 2 stroke oil buns up and shouldnt be as harmful as unburnt oil.... I would like to see real data about that. Matt |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What does MIT say about ionization and lightning?? | ASA | |||
2004 9.9 Mercury - 2 stroke or 4 stroke? | General | |||
Need a new 2-4 hp outboard - must be 2 stroke - what's available outside California | Cruising | |||
2 stroke vs. 4 stroke?? | General | |||
4 stroke produces more "thrust"???? | General |