Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 1st 16, 02:29 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,520
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

....to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

  #2   Report Post  
Old January 1st 16, 06:01 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2015
Posts: 920
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

  #3   Report Post  
Old January 1st 16, 07:32 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.
  #4   Report Post  
Old January 1st 16, 10:18 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On 1/1/2016 1:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I hope congress is keeping track of all the O'Bama poop they are going
to have to flush when he's retired.
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 16, 12:51 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,520
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.


Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 16, 04:34 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 07:51:18 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.


Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.


They would rather have the issue than to find a solution. It is
politics as usual.
  #7   Report Post  
Old January 2nd 16, 11:08 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 33,480
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...


Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.
  #10   Report Post  
Old January 3rd 16, 03:54 PM posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default New Gun Controls! I can't wait...

On 1/2/2016 9:25 PM, wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 18:58:15 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 1/2/16 6:08 PM,
wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jan 2016 15:16:57 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

+-

I suspect the only effect would be a whole lot more people having an
FFL, a bigger ATF and more revenue for the government. It still does
nothing to stop the illegal trade because it is already illegal.


It is not easy to get an FFL...

Certainly a lot easier than a CCW in Md.
You just need a clean record, a place of business and a check.



A friend of mine who runs a nice sporting, tackle, long rifle store and
has for 25 years, said it took nearly nine months for his handgun FFL to
be processed. I think it is a little more difficult than you think, but
maybe not in Florida. Dunno. Are there any real regs in Florida?


This is a FEDERAL license. (so "Florida" was just a troll)
Nobody said it was FAST, just not that HARD.

This is the application. It has not changed much if at all between now
and the one I filled out in 1989. The fees sound higher but I am not
sure.

https://www.atf.gov/file/61506/download

If Harry could get a Maryland carry permit anyone could get a FFL. Harry
says it was easy peasy to get a carry permit. I don't know if I believe
his story though.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
It's a tax. No, wait, it's a penalty... No wait, it's a tax... iBoaterer[_2_] General 1 July 7th 12 08:50 AM
Wilbur's (wait - Gregory's) (WAIT - Neal?'s) MSD court victory Flying Pig[_2_] Cruising 3 January 30th 12 03:23 PM
Please don't wait Ken Marino ASA 23 November 11th 08 08:09 PM
I just cant wait Joe ASA 11 December 25th 04 05:03 PM
OUtboard Controls.. I have a Johnson.. Ordered the controls and they say "MERC " on them? [email protected] General 1 May 12th 04 12:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017