....to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Sat, 02 Jan 2016 07:51:18 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Fri, 01 Jan 2016 14:32:37 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 1 Jan 2016 10:01:05 -0800, Califbill billnews wrote:

John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.
I guess he stalled around long enough that he will be out of office
before the courts sort this mess out. One thing he said, can be done
and should. Prosecute the ones who try to buy guns and are prohibited.
That will either put some bad guys in jail or fix the flawed lists.
Again we would be fixing a flawed government process in the courts.

Enforcing the existing laws is a no-brainer. Wonder why it took him so long to think
of it.

They would rather have the issue than to find a solution. It is
politics as usual.

On 1/1/2016 1:01 PM, Califbill wrote:
John H. wrote:
...to see which of them would have prevented the mass shootings.

http://tinyurl.com/h95cb2d

It will be even more interesting to see which of them will make our government
bigger!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Yes, rule by fiat. Forget about the other branches of government.

I hope congress is keeping track of all the O'Bama poop they are going
to have to flush when he's retired.