On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:29:22 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.

On 11/15/2015 7:20 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 11:29:22 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Sunday, November 15, 2015 at 12:38:42 PM UTC-6, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 12:28:29 -0500, John H.
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 09:33:26 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:27 AM, John H. wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 07:54:04 +0000, RGrew176
wrote:


;1048830 Wrote:
On Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:16:40 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:
-
At this point I think WW III is inevitable. Just a matter of time.
Russia and maybe even China may end up being allies.-

I am not sure China really cares about this because they don't seem to
have a muslim problem. They have sense enough not to have "made in
China" bomb fragments in the rubble.
The idea that we would partner up with the russians to kill several
million muslims is not totally off the wall tho. They have far worse
islamic terrorism problems than we do and it is right on their
borders, not across an ocean.
I doubt it would actually accomplish much tho.

That is because they have pretty much banned Islam in China.

http://tinyurl.com/patk2fk

Smart moves.
--


Good grief...you righties really truly have your heads up your asses
when it comes to knowledge of the world and the way it is. If there is
an antidote for Fox News and crazy rightwingedness, you ought to take it
three times a day.

The PRC has *not* banned Islam. There are millions of Muslims in China,
there are Muslim schools, festivals, cultural activities, architectural,
ways to practice Muslim dietary laws.

The site RGrew176 cited is a right-wing, bat**** crazy christian site
run by a convert.

Wow, apparently you didn't bother to read the article.

Harry admires the Chinese style commitment to the free exercise of
religion.
Essentially the policy is "It is OK as long as nobody ever sees it or
hears about it".
If it ever inconveniences the government in any way it is stamped out.

Personally I don't care either way. This is China and the chinese have
the right to run their country as they wish. It is really none of our
business as long as they don't bother us with it. We certainly do not
want them telling us how our government should work.
I am not even that upset that they are building islands in the South
China Sea.
These are largely uninhabited spits of volcanic rock that everyone
claimed but nobody actually wanted to do anything with. We should be
able to negotiate some kind of settlement here without shooting
anyone.

That's nice.

Can or will you dispute the article? Honestly, I don't think you can, but it was interesting reading your knee-jerk reaction to it.

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.

I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news source.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/0...070016245.html

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted

On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now? Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

On 11/16/2015 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


The only things he could prove are that he neglects to pay his taxes and
other financial obligations. Those are a matter of public record. He
can't even prove that he's married to the lovely Ms Grear, or that he
has any financial interest in her home. Harry is a leech, liar, and
layabout. Why do you bother to engage him?

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:11:25 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

I stand by my comment. They have the same attitude as you do. They
don't ban the religion they just do not want to ever see any public
display of it. It is a don't ask don't tell policy.

On 11/16/15 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:11:25 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

I stand by my comment. They have the same attitude as you do. They
don't ban the religion they just do not want to ever see any public
display of it. It is a don't ask don't tell policy.


I don't have a problem with displays of religion on private property. I
don't even have a problem with the "National Christmas Tree" in downtown DC.