On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:50:10 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 11/16/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.


Are you sure you are a writer, Krause?

I wonder why Donnie doesn't jump in to help you out? You sure could use
some assistance with your writing.

Donnie! Help!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:56:13 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 11/16/2015 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


The only things he could prove are that he neglects to pay his taxes and
other financial obligations. Those are a matter of public record. He
can't even prove that he's married to the lovely Ms Grear, or that he
has any financial interest in her home. Harry is a leech, liar, and
layabout. Why do you bother to engage him?

Well, uncovering lies is kinda fun, you know.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:07:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.


In his mind there's nothing to blame. The actions of today's extremist Muslims are,
using Krauselogic, totally justified by the actions of Christians a thousand years
ago.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!

On 11/16/15 9:07 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.



He's got enough blame on his plate.

On 11/16/15 10:28 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:07:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.


In his mind there's nothing to blame. The actions of today's extremist Muslims are,
using Krauselogic, totally justified by the actions of Christians a thousand years
ago.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



In your mind, well, there's nothing there.

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:11:25 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

I stand by my comment. They have the same attitude as you do. They
don't ban the religion they just do not want to ever see any public
display of it. It is a don't ask don't tell policy.

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

We could easily extend that complaint to a lot of left wing practices
like global warming hysteria.

On 11/16/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote:
Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.
........

Do I remember?

Harry I wasn't born then...


Never heard or read about them, eh?
Figures.

On 11/16/15 8:03 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:50:38 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 7:45 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:28:08 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now?

No

Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?

No


Oh, so you are ignorant of those "Christian practices," too. Well, there
are plenty of examples.

So thousand-year-old Christian atrocities justify today's Muslim atrocities? You're a
joke, Krause.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


I didn't say or imply that, moron.

On 11/16/15 11:07 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:11:25 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

I stand by my comment. They have the same attitude as you do. They
don't ban the religion they just do not want to ever see any public
display of it. It is a don't ask don't tell policy.


I don't have a problem with displays of religion on private property. I
don't even have a problem with the "National Christmas Tree" in downtown DC.